Kitchen C E W, Lewis S, Tiffin P A, Welsh P R, Howey L, Ekers D
School of Medicine, Pharmacy and Health, Durham University, Durham, UK.
Department of Geography, Durham University, Durham, UK.
Trials. 2017 May 25;18(1):237. doi: 10.1186/s13063-017-1982-8.
Prior to commencing a randomised controlled trial, we conducted a focused ethnography to ensure that the trial was well suited to the proposed setting.
A six-month observation of a Child and Adolescent Mental Health Service site in the North-East of England was undertaken to observe the site procedures, staff culture and patient care pathways. During this period, documentary data were collected and interviews were conducted with key informants to provide insight into staff perceptions of the proposed trial. The data were coded using thematic analysis and the resulting themes were verified by a second coder.
Seventeen documents were collected, 158 h of observation and six formal staff interviews were undertaken. Four themes emerged from the data; non-clinically orientated variation in practice, diagnosis, capacity and staff economy. Non-clinically orientated variation in practice occurred when staff decisions were based upon resource availability rather than on clinical judgement. Diagnosis demonstrated differing staff confidence in making diagnoses and in the treatment of patients who had received a diagnosis. Capacity consisted of the time to attend training and the psychological capacity to consider or incorporate learning into practice. Staff economy was characterised by staff changes and shortages. There was significant interaction between the themes, with staff economy emerging as a central barrier to research. The results directly informed adaptations to the trial protocol.
An ethnographic approach has provided important insights into the individual, practical and organisational boundaries into which a trial would need to be implemented.
在开展一项随机对照试验之前,我们进行了一次针对性的人种志研究,以确保该试验适合拟议的环境。
对英格兰东北部一个儿童和青少年心理健康服务站点进行了为期六个月的观察,以观察站点程序、员工文化和患者护理路径。在此期间,收集了文献数据,并与关键信息提供者进行了访谈,以深入了解员工对拟议试验的看法。使用主题分析对数据进行编码,结果主题由另一位编码员进行验证。
收集了17份文件,进行了158小时的观察,并对6名正式员工进行了访谈。数据中出现了四个主题:实践中的非临床导向性差异、诊断、能力和员工经济性。当员工的决策基于资源可用性而非临床判断时,就会出现实践中的非临床导向性差异。诊断显示员工在做出诊断以及治疗已确诊患者方面的信心存在差异。能力包括参加培训的时间以及考虑或将学习纳入实践的心理能力。员工经济性的特点是员工变动和短缺。这些主题之间存在显著的相互作用,员工经济性成为研究的核心障碍。研究结果直接为试验方案的调整提供了依据。
人种志方法为试验实施所需的个人、实践和组织边界提供了重要见解。