将术前放化疗治疗反应纳入局部进展期直肠癌的阳性环周切缘定义:多中心验证研究。

Redefining the Positive Circumferential Resection Margin by Incorporating Preoperative Chemoradiotherapy Treatment Response in Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer: A Multicenter Validation Study.

机构信息

Department of Radiation Oncology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.

Department of Surgery, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.

出版信息

Cancer Res Treat. 2018 Apr;50(2):506-517. doi: 10.4143/crt.2016.607. Epub 2017 May 24.

Abstract

PURPOSE

This study was conducted to validate the prognostic influence of treatment response among patients with positive circumferential resection margin for locally advanced rectal cancer.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Clinical data of 197 patientswith positive circumferentialresection margin defined as ≤ 2 mm after preoperative chemoradiotherapy followed by total mesorectal excision between 2004 and 2009were collected forthis multicenter validation study. All patients underwent median 50.4Gy radiationwith concurrentfluoropyrimidine based chemotherapy. Treatmentresponse was dichotomized to good response, including treatmentresponse of grade 2 or 3, and poor response, including grade 0 or 1.

RESULTS

After 52 months median follow-up, 5-year overall survival (OS) for good responders and poor responders was 79.1% and 48.4%, respectively (p < 0.001). In multivariate analysis, circumferential resection margin involvement and treatment response were a prognosticator for OS and locoregional recurrence-free survival. In subgroup analysis, good responders with close margin showed significantly better survival outcomes for survival. Good responders with involved margin and poor responders with close margin shared similar results, whereas poorresponderswith involved margin hadworst survival (5-year OS, 81.2%, 57.0%, 50.0%, and 32.4%, respectively; p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Among patients with positive circumferential resection margin after preoperative chemoradiotherapy, survival of the good responders was significantly better than poor responders. Subgroup analysis revealed that definition of positive circumferential resection margin may be individualized as involvement for good responders, whereas ≤ 2 mm for poor responders.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在验证局部晚期直肠癌环周切缘阳性患者的治疗反应对预后的影响。

材料和方法

本多中心验证性研究收集了 2004 年至 2009 年间接受术前放化疗后全直肠系膜切除术且环周切缘阳性(定义为≤2mm)的 197 例患者的临床资料。所有患者均接受中位剂量为 50.4Gy 的放疗,并同步氟嘧啶类化疗。将治疗反应分为良好反应(包括 2 级或 3 级的治疗反应)和不良反应(包括 0 级或 1 级的治疗反应)。

结果

中位随访 52 个月后,良好反应组和不良反应组的 5 年总生存率(OS)分别为 79.1%和 48.4%(p<0.001)。多因素分析显示,环周切缘累及和治疗反应是 OS 和局部无复发生存的预后因素。亚组分析显示,切缘阳性且治疗反应良好的患者,局部复发风险较低,生存获益明显。切缘阳性且治疗反应不良的患者和切缘阳性且治疗反应良好的患者的生存结果相似,而切缘阳性且治疗反应不良的患者的生存结果最差(5 年 OS 分别为 81.2%、57.0%、50.0%和 32.4%;p<0.001)。

结论

在术前放化疗后环周切缘阳性的患者中,治疗反应良好的患者的生存明显优于治疗反应不良的患者。亚组分析显示,环周切缘阳性的定义可能需要个体化,对于治疗反应良好的患者,定义为累及;对于治疗反应不良的患者,定义为≤2mm。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/51a6/5912136/563cb9fdc52c/crt-2016-607f1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索