Miller Darlene
Research Associate Professor, Department of Ophthalmology, Department of Microbiology and Immunology, Bascom Palmer Eye Institute, University of Miami, Miami, FL, USA.
Middle East Afr J Ophthalmol. 2017 Jan-Mar;24(1):30-42. doi: 10.4103/meajo.MEAJO_276_16.
The purpose of this review is to provide an update on the epidemiology and current antibiotic-resistant threats in ophthalmology.
Trends in frequency and antibiotic-nonsusceptible profiles during an 11 year-period (2005-2015) were evaluated and compared with the 5-year Antibiotic Resistance Monitoring in Ocular Microorganism (ARMOR) study.
Trends in the current review confirmed the continued high rates of fluoroquinolone nonsusceptbility circulating among ocular methicillin-susceptible , methicillin-susceptible , methicillin-resistant , and methicillin-resistant isolates as well as the detection of uncommon, but emerging resistance (<5%) for , group, , and . We documented significant differences in empirical fluoroquinolone and aminoglycoside coverage for the top three ocular pathogens (coagulase-negative staphylococci, , and ) in general and for corneal isolates between the Miami and the ARMOR studies. Collectively, the coverage for Miami was 74% versus 65.9% for ARMOR ( < 0.0001, 5.3674-10.8042) for ciprofloxacin and 95.9% versus 84.2% for aminoglycosides (gentamicin/tobramycin) ( < 0.0001, 9.9925-13.3974). Monotherapy coverage for ciprofloxacin and levofloxacin for the most recent 5 years (2011-2015) was 76.6% and 77.1%, respectively. Combination therapy with a fluoroquinolone and vancomycin and/or vancomycin and an aminoglycoside provided coverage for 99% and 98% of the isolates, respectively.
The etiology of ocular pathogens is patient, source, and geography specific. The true incidence and/or prevalence are unknown. Fluoroquinolone monotherapy as standard therapy for common ocular infections needs to be reassessed. Ophthalmologists must become proactive and join the crusade to develop practical and prudent strategies for the administration of topical antibiotics.
本综述旨在提供眼科领域流行病学及当前抗生素耐药威胁的最新情况。
评估了11年期间(2005 - 2015年)的频率趋势及抗生素不敏感谱,并与为期5年的眼部微生物抗生素耐药监测(ARMOR)研究进行比较。
本综述中的趋势证实,在眼部甲氧西林敏感、甲氧西林敏感、甲氧西林耐药和甲氧西林耐药分离株中,氟喹诺酮不敏感性持续处于较高水平,同时还检测到了罕见但正在出现的对[具体药物或菌群]的耐药性(<5%)。我们记录了迈阿密研究与ARMOR研究在针对前三种眼部病原体(凝固酶阴性葡萄球菌、[其他病原体]和[其他病原体])的经验性氟喹诺酮和氨基糖苷覆盖范围方面存在显著差异,总体而言以及角膜分离株方面均如此。总体而言,迈阿密研究中ciprofloxacin的覆盖范围为74%,而ARMOR研究为65.9%(P < 0.0001,5.3674 - 10.8042),氨基糖苷(庆大霉素/妥布霉素)的覆盖范围分别为95.9%和84.2%(P < 0.0001,9.9925 - 13.3974)。最近5年(2011 - 2015年)ciprofloxacin和左氧氟沙星的单药治疗覆盖范围分别为76.6%和77.1%。氟喹诺酮与万古霉素和/或万古霉素与氨基糖苷的联合治疗分别为99%和98%的分离株提供了覆盖。
眼部病原体的病因因患者、来源和地理位置而异。真实发病率和/或患病率尚不清楚。作为常见眼部感染标准治疗的氟喹诺酮单药治疗需要重新评估。眼科医生必须积极主动,加入这场为局部抗生素给药制定切实可行且谨慎策略的运动。