Clementz Mark T, Koch Paul L
Department of Earth Sciences, University of California, Santa Cruz, CA, 95064, USA.
Oecologia. 2001 Nov;129(3):461-472. doi: 10.1007/s004420100745. Epub 2001 Nov 1.
We analyzed the carbon and oxygen isotope composition of tooth enamel from mammals inhabiting marine and terrestrial ecosystems to determine whether these stable isotopes were robust indicators of foraging and habitat preferences. Consumers were separated into six habitats (offshore, nearshore, kelp beds, estuarine, freshwater, terrestrial). Consumer δC values were correlated with the δC values of primary producers within each habitat, suggesting that δC values of tooth enamel are a viable proxy for foraging zones. Offshore and terrestrial consumer δC values were not significantly different, however, indicating that carbon isotope analysis alone is not sufficient to distinguish foraging within these two ecosystems. We propose that oxygen isotopes can be used along with δC values to further clarify habitat use. Oxygen isotopes were assessed as an indicator of habitat use. Consumers were grouped into four categories: aquatic-marine, aquatic-estuarine, aquatic-freshwater, and terrestrial. Populations of aquatic taxa had significantly lower standard deviations for δO values than those of terrestrial taxa. Mean δO values of aquatic taxa were significantly different among groups, but surprisingly, the mean values for freshwater taxa were higher than those for marine taxa. We conclude that variation in δO values of mammalian populations is a valid indicator of aquatic habits, but that mean δO values should be utilized with caution when trying to discriminate between marine and freshwater habitat use. Together, δC and δO values serve as valuable tools for identifying foraging and habitat preferences in modern marine and terrestrial ecosystems, and may provide similar information on ancient ecosystems.
我们分析了栖息于海洋和陆地生态系统的哺乳动物牙釉质的碳氧同位素组成,以确定这些稳定同位素是否是觅食和栖息地偏好的可靠指标。消费者被分为六个栖息地(近海、近岸、海带床、河口、淡水、陆地)。消费者的δC值与每个栖息地内初级生产者的δC值相关,这表明牙釉质的δC值是觅食区域的一个可行替代指标。然而,近海和陆地消费者的δC值没有显著差异,这表明仅靠碳同位素分析不足以区分这两个生态系统中的觅食情况。我们建议氧同位素可以与δC值一起使用,以进一步阐明栖息地的利用情况。氧同位素被评估为栖息地利用的一个指标。消费者被分为四类:海洋水生、河口水生、淡水水生和陆地。水生类群种群的δO值标准差明显低于陆地类群。水生类群的平均δO值在不同组之间有显著差异,但令人惊讶的是,淡水类群的平均值高于海洋类群。我们得出结论,哺乳动物种群δO值的变化是水生习性的一个有效指标,但在试图区分海洋和淡水栖息地利用时,应谨慎使用平均δO值。δC和δO值共同作为识别现代海洋和陆地生态系统中觅食和栖息地偏好的有价值工具,并且可能为古代生态系统提供类似信息。