Spinks Andrew C, Bennett Nigel C, Jarvis Jennifer U M
Department of Zoology, University of Cape Town, Private Bag, Rondebosch 7700, South Africa, South Africa.
Mammal Research Institute, Department of Zoology and Entomology, University of Pretoria, Pretoria 0002, South Africa, South Africa.
Oecologia. 2000 Nov;125(3):341-349. doi: 10.1007/s004420000460. Epub 2000 Nov 1.
The aridity food distribution hypothesis (AFDH) maintains that ecological constraints in arid habitats curtail dispersal and promote the evolution of cooperative foraging social groups within the African mole-rats. To evaluate the validity of the AFDH, we investigated inter-habitat differences in food resource characteristics, foraging behaviour, colony size and individual body mass in two common mole-rat populations, one from a mesic and one from an arid habitat. Although food was clumped at both localities, the geophyte density was lower at the arid site. However, geophytes from the arid site were larger than those from the mesic region, and this is suggested to compensate for the reduced geophyte density, enabling colonies to meet their energy requirements. Differences in food resource characteristics in turn influenced the pattern of foraging, the burrow systems at the arid site being longer and more linear than those from the mesic site. Mean colony size did not differ between the two sites, but animals from the arid site exhibited a reduced individual mass relative to those from the mesic area, probably an adaptation to reduce total colony energy expenditure given the elevated foraging costs in arid environments. The common mole-rat from the arid localities should occur in larger colonies than their mesic counterparts. The results from this investigation do not support this contention.
干旱食物分布假说(AFDH)认为,干旱栖息地的生态限制会减少扩散,并促进非洲鼹形鼠群体内合作觅食社会群体的进化。为了评估AFDH的有效性,我们调查了两个常见鼹形鼠种群在栖息地间食物资源特征、觅食行为、群体大小和个体体重的差异,一个种群来自湿润栖息地,另一个来自干旱栖息地。尽管两个地点的食物都呈聚集分布,但干旱地点的地下块茎植物密度较低。然而,干旱地点的地下块茎植物比湿润地区的更大,这被认为是对地下块茎植物密度降低的一种补偿,使群体能够满足其能量需求。食物资源特征的差异进而影响了觅食模式,干旱地点的洞穴系统比湿润地点的更长且更呈线性。两个地点的平均群体大小没有差异,但干旱地点的动物相对于湿润地区的动物个体体重有所降低,这可能是一种适应,以降低群体总能量消耗,因为干旱环境中的觅食成本较高。干旱地区的普通鼹形鼠应该比湿润地区的鼹形鼠形成更大的群体。本次调查结果并不支持这一观点。