Suppr超能文献

基于碎屑的食物网中的自上而下控制:鱼类、碎食者与树叶分解

Top-down control in a detritus-based food web: fish, shredders, and leaf breakdown.

作者信息

Ruetz Carl R, Newman Raymond M, Vondracek Bruce

机构信息

Minnesota Cooperative Fish and Wildlife Research Unit, Department of Fisheries, Wildlife, and Conservation Biology, University of Minnesota, 200 Hodson Hall, 1980 Folwell Ave., St. Paul, MN, 55108, USA.

Department of Fisheries, Wildlife, and Conservation Biology, University of Minnesota, 200 Hodson Hall, 1980 Folwell Ave., St. Paul, MN, 55108, USA.

出版信息

Oecologia. 2002 Jul;132(2):307-315. doi: 10.1007/s00442-002-0953-1. Epub 2002 Jul 1.

Abstract

We tested the hypothesis that fish decrease shredder abundance in leaf packs, thereby reducing leaf breakdown rates. Our goal was to test for the occurrence of a trophic cascade in a detritus-based food web. Willow leaves (Salix spp.) were fastened into leaf packs and placed into cages (13×13×13 cm) in Valley Creek, Minnesota, USA. Fish were excluded from leaf packs that were placed in cages with mesh on all sides, whereas open control cages allowed fish access to leaf packs. We collected leaf packs from two replicate cages 0, 14, 31, 55, and 112 days after placement in each of three riffles (n=6 per collection). Total abundance of invertebrates and shredders inhabiting leaf packs was significantly higher in exclosures than controls (P<0.01) and increased with exposure time in the stream (P<0.01). Three of the four common shredder taxa had significantly higher biomass in exclosures than controls (P<0.015). Biomass of Hesperophylax (Trichoptera) larvae was significantly higher in controls during the final collections (P<0.03), probably because these large, case-building larvae were less vulnerable to fish predation. Leaf breakdown rates differed significantly between exclosures and controls (P=0.003), but the direction of effects varied among riffles. When shredder density was analyzed separately for each riffle, we found that shredder density may explain differences in leaf breakdown rates between exclosures and controls. The differential responses of shredder taxa to predators may explain variability in fish effects on leaf breakdown. In conclusion, leaf packs did not provide invertebrates refuge from fish predation and fish reduced the densities of most shredders. Fish can indirectly affect leaf breakdown rates, but different responses to predation among taxa within the shredder guild can cause interactions that contradict trophic cascade predictions.

摘要

我们检验了这样一个假设

鱼类会减少叶堆中碎食者的数量,从而降低树叶的分解速率。我们的目标是检验基于碎屑的食物网中营养级联的发生情况。将柳叶(柳属物种)固定成叶堆,放置在美国明尼苏达州山谷溪中边长为13×13×13厘米的笼子里。用四周都有网的笼子放置叶堆,使鱼类无法接触到叶堆,而开放的对照笼子则允许鱼类接触叶堆。在三个浅滩中每个浅滩放置叶堆后,我们在第0、14、31、55和112天从两个重复的笼子中收集叶堆(每次收集n = 6)。栖息在叶堆中的无脊椎动物和碎食者的总数量在围栏中显著高于对照组(P < 0.01),并且随着在溪流中的暴露时间增加(P < 0.01)。四种常见碎食者分类群中的三种,其在围栏中的生物量显著高于对照组(P < 0.015)。在最后一次收集时,赫氏毛翅蝇(毛翅目)幼虫的生物量在对照组中显著更高(P < 0.03),可能是因为这些体型较大、建造虫茧的幼虫较不易受到鱼类捕食。围栏和对照组之间的树叶分解速率存在显著差异(P = 0.003),但影响的方向在不同浅滩间有所不同。当分别对每个浅滩的碎食者密度进行分析时,我们发现碎食者密度可能解释了围栏和对照组之间树叶分解速率的差异。碎食者分类群对捕食者的不同反应可能解释了鱼类对树叶分解影响的变异性。总之,叶堆并没有为无脊椎动物提供躲避鱼类捕食的庇护所,鱼类降低了大多数碎食者的密度。鱼类可以间接影响树叶分解速率,但碎食者类群中不同分类群对捕食的不同反应可能导致与营养级联预测相矛盾的相互作用。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验