Webster Michael S
Department of Zoology, Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR, 97333-2419, USA.
Oecologia. 2002 Mar;131(1):52-60. doi: 10.1007/s00442-001-0860-x. Epub 2002 Mar 1.
Populations with dispersive larvae are often demographically open such that local reproduction and subsequent larval settlement are not linked. Thus, understanding whether and how settlement patterns are established and subsequently modified is central to understanding local demography. Settlement is typically not measured directly, but rather it is estimated by recruitment, which is the observation of new individuals sometime after settlement. At Lizard Island on the Great Barrier Reef, I examined how patterns of recruitment of coral-reef fishes were modified across a range of natural recruit densities in the presence and absence of resident predators. Resident predators decreased recruitment and increased mortality for all species, but these effects varied considerably among species. The effects of predators on recruitment were at least partly due to mortality within 2 days after settlement. At their most extreme, predators caused recruitment failure of several species of butterflyfish. For one species of damselfish (Pomacentrus amboinensis), predators both induced weakly density-dependent mortality and obscured any relationship between recruitment and subsequent abundance, while for another damselfish (Neopomacentrus cyanomos), mortality was density-independent and subsequent abundance was a function of recruitment. These contrasting results may reflect differences in prey behavior. P. amboinensis tended to feed near or within the branches of coral inhabited by resident predators, while N. cyanomos tended to feed higher in the water column above the reefs, and thus farther away from resident predators. These results highlight the speed and extent to which patterns of settlement are modified, indicating that caution should be exercised when attributing patterns of recruitment to patterns of settlement. Tremendous between-species variation in how patterns of recruitment, and presumably settlement, were modified by predation indicates that generalizations or between-species extrapolations about the magnitude of these effects may be unwarranted.
具有扩散性幼体的种群在人口统计学上往往是开放的,以至于局部繁殖和随后的幼体定居并无关联。因此,了解定居模式是否以及如何形成并随后发生改变,对于理解局部人口统计学至关重要。定居通常不是直接测量的,而是通过补充量来估计,补充量是指在定居后的某个时间对新个体的观察。在大堡礁的蜥蜴岛,我研究了在有和没有常驻捕食者的情况下,一系列自然补充量密度范围内珊瑚礁鱼类的补充量模式是如何改变的。常驻捕食者降低了所有物种的补充量并增加了死亡率,但这些影响在不同物种间差异很大。捕食者对补充量的影响至少部分归因于定居后两天内的死亡率。在最极端的情况下,捕食者导致几种蝴蝶鱼的补充失败。对于一种雀鲷(安汶雀鲷),捕食者既诱导了弱密度依赖性死亡率,又掩盖了补充量与随后丰度之间的任何关系,而对于另一种雀鲷(蓝雀鲷),死亡率与密度无关,随后的丰度是补充量的函数。这些截然不同的结果可能反映了猎物行为的差异。安汶雀鲷倾向于在常驻捕食者栖息的珊瑚分支附近或内部觅食,而蓝雀鲷倾向于在珊瑚礁上方的水柱中更高处觅食,因此离常驻捕食者更远。这些结果凸显了定居模式被改变的速度和程度,表明在将补充量模式归因于定居模式时应谨慎。捕食对补充量模式(大概还有定居模式)的改变在物种间存在巨大差异,这表明对这些影响的大小进行概括或物种间外推可能是不合理的。