Palacios M M, Malerba M E, McCormick M I
Department of Marine Biology and Aquaculture, ARC Centre of Excellence for Coral Reef Studies, James Cook University, Townsville, QLD, 4811, Australia.
School of Biological Sciences, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, 3800, Australia.
Oecologia. 2018 Oct;188(2):417-427. doi: 10.1007/s00442-018-4182-7. Epub 2018 Jun 11.
Predicting multiple predator effects (MPEs) on shared prey remains one of the biggest challenges in ecology. Empirical evidence indicates that interactions among predators can alter predation rates and modify any expected linear effects on prey survival. Knowledge on predator density, identity and life-history traits is expected to help predict the behavioral mechanisms that lead to non-linear changes in predation. Yet, few studies have rigorously examined the effects of predator-predator interactions on prey survival, particularly with marine vertebrate predators. Using an additive-substitutive design, we experimentally paired reef piscivores with different hunting mode [active predator, Pseudochromis fuscus (F); ambush predators, Cephalopholis boenak (B), Epinephelus maculatus (M)] to determine how behavioral interactions modified their combined impacts on damselfish prey. Results showed that behavioral patterns among predators matched those predicted from their hunting mode. However, it was the identity of the predators what determined the strength of any positive or negative interactions, and thus the nature and magnitude of MPEs on prey survival (i.e., risk-enhancing effects: treatments BB, MM and FM; risk-reducing: BM; and linear effects: FF, FB). Given the specificity of predator-predator interactions, none of the predators were fully functionally redundant. Even when two species seemed substitutable (i.e., predators F and M), they led to vastly diverse effects when paired with additional predator species (i.e., B). We concluded that knowledge of the identity of the predator species and the behavioral interactions among them is crucial to successfully predict MPEs in natural systems.
预测多种捕食者对共享猎物的影响(MPEs)仍然是生态学中最大的挑战之一。实证证据表明,捕食者之间的相互作用可以改变捕食率,并改变对猎物生存的任何预期线性影响。关于捕食者密度、身份和生活史特征的知识有望帮助预测导致捕食非线性变化的行为机制。然而,很少有研究严格考察捕食者 - 捕食者相互作用对猎物生存的影响,特别是对于海洋脊椎动物捕食者。我们采用加法 - 替代设计,将具有不同捕食模式的珊瑚礁食鱼动物(主动捕食者,黑背拟雀鲷(F);伏击捕食者,勃氏九棘鲈(B)、黄斑石斑鱼(M))进行实验配对,以确定行为相互作用如何改变它们对雀鲷猎物的综合影响。结果表明,捕食者之间的行为模式与根据其捕食模式预测的模式相符。然而,决定任何正或负相互作用强度的是捕食者的身份,从而决定了对猎物生存的MPEs的性质和程度(即风险增强效应:处理组BB、MM和FM;风险降低:BM;以及线性效应:FF、FB)。鉴于捕食者 - 捕食者相互作用的特异性,没有一种捕食者在功能上是完全冗余的。即使两个物种看起来是可替代的(即捕食者F和M),当它们与其他捕食者物种(即B)配对时,也会产生截然不同的影响。我们得出结论:了解捕食者物种身份及其之间的行为相互作用对于成功预测自然系统中的MPEs至关重要。