Suppr超能文献

高密度脊髓刺激在试验、植入和转换患者中的疗效:一项回顾性病例系列研究。

The Efficacy of High-Density Spinal Cord Stimulation Among Trial, Implant, and Conversion Patients: A Retrospective Case Series.

作者信息

Provenzano David A, Rebman Jared, Kuhel Cody, Trenz Hilary, Kilgore Jason

机构信息

Pain Diagnostics and Interventional Care, Sewickley, PA, USA.

Washington & Jefferson College, Washington, PA, USA.

出版信息

Neuromodulation. 2017 Oct;20(7):654-660. doi: 10.1111/ner.12612. Epub 2017 May 25.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

Methods of energy delivery for traditional spinal cord stimulation (SCS) systems consist of adjusting programming parameters to affect the total charge delivered per unit time. One high electrical charge delivery method being considered is subthreshold high density (HD) programming. To date, there is limited clinical evidence for the efficacy and safety of paresthesia-free HD programming. The aim of this study was to examine the efficacy and safety of HD programming.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A retrospective review was performed on HD-programmed SCS patients with a minimum of one year follow-up. Three HD categories were examined: trial, implant, and conversion (i.e., patients with conventional SCS who were converted to HD settings). High density amplitude settings were below paresthesia threshold. Patients were classified as responders to HD if they preferred the paresthesia-free HD setting to the conventional setting and demonstrated ≥50% pain reduction compared to baseline pain score on delivery and no-stimulation related neurological deficit. Adverse effects were documented.

RESULTS

Seventeen patients were identified, including 11 conversion patients and six patients who had positive response to HD programming during the trial and then were implanted. For trial/implant and conversion patients, both HD and conventional programming significantly reduced the numerical pain rating scale (NRPS) compared to baseline (p ≤ 0.026). Pain scores were not significantly different between the HD and traditional programs for the trial (p = 0.060), implant (p = 0.632), and conversion categories (p = 0.658). Through at least 12 months of follow-up, eight (47%) patients continued to be HD responders.

CONCLUSIONS

In subpopulations, HD programming may be a viable option to deliver subthreshold pain reduction. Randomized, controlled trials with extended follow-up are needed to further evaluate HD programming.

摘要

目的

传统脊髓刺激(SCS)系统的能量传递方法包括调整编程参数以影响单位时间内传递的总电荷。一种正在考虑的高电荷传递方法是阈下高密度(HD)编程。迄今为止,关于无感觉异常的HD编程的疗效和安全性的临床证据有限。本研究的目的是检验HD编程的疗效和安全性。

材料与方法

对接受HD编程的SCS患者进行回顾性研究,随访时间至少为一年。研究了三种HD类别:试验、植入和转换(即从传统SCS转换为HD设置的患者)。高密度振幅设置低于感觉异常阈值。如果患者更喜欢无感觉异常的HD设置而非传统设置,并且与基线疼痛评分相比,在刺激开启和无刺激时疼痛减轻≥50%且无刺激相关神经功能缺损,则将其分类为HD应答者。记录不良反应。

结果

共纳入17例患者,包括11例转换患者和6例在试验期间对HD编程有阳性反应然后接受植入的患者。对于试验/植入患者和转换患者,与基线相比,HD编程和传统编程均显著降低了数字疼痛评分量表(NRPS)(p≤0.026)。在试验(p = 0.060)、植入(p = 0.632)和转换类别(p = 0.658)中,HD编程和传统编程之间的疼痛评分无显著差异。经过至少12个月的随访,8例(47%)患者仍然是HD应答者。

结论

在亚组中,HD编程可能是一种可行的阈下减轻疼痛的选择。需要进行长期随访的随机对照试验来进一步评估HD编程。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验