Suppr超能文献

猕猴、黑猩猩、人类和南方古猿恒牙萌出顺序:其进化意义。

Sequence of emergence of the permanent teeth in Macaca, Pan, Homo, and Australopithecus: Its evolutionary significance.

作者信息

Smith B Holly

机构信息

Museum of Anthropology, The University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109.

出版信息

Am J Hum Biol. 1994;6(1):61-76. doi: 10.1002/ajhb.1310060110.

Abstract

There are two main questions about the sequence of emergence of the permanent teeth in humans: 1) Why is there so much variation in sequence within human populations? (2) What is the adaptive or evolutionary significance of emergence sequence? Here, the human condition is considered by comparing us to other living primates and to our evolutionary past and considered in the light of Schultz's hypothesis that sequence of tooth emergence is adapted to rate of postnatal growth (Schultz AH. In JM Tanner (ed.) Human Growth, pp 1-20, 1960). Frequencies of individual pairwise sequences (e.g., M I vs. I M ) in the emergence of the permanent dentition are described for N = 110 Macaca nemestrina, and compared to N = 157 Pan troglodytes and ≥6,000 Homo sapiens. In addition, sequences of gingival emergence are reconstructed for Australopithecus and early Homo. Trends observed across these catarrhine primates suggest that sequence and variability in sequence can be understood by a simple model of adaptation of tooth emergence to growth rate. As rate of postnatal growth slows, molars drift to later positions in sequence, either by always emerging late in sequence, or by varying in the direction of late emergence. "Augmented sequences" (sequences written with notations about variability) are important in recognizing evolutionary trends; further, they often alter perception of similarities and differences among taxa. Although samples are small, Australopithecus africanus resembles the rapidly developing genera Macaca and Pan more than it resembles Homo sapiens. © 1994 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

摘要

关于人类恒牙萌出顺序主要有两个问题

1)为什么人类群体内部的萌出顺序存在如此大的差异?(2)萌出顺序的适应性或进化意义是什么?在这里,通过将人类与其他现存灵长类动物以及我们的进化史进行比较来考虑人类的情况,并根据舒尔茨的假设进行考量,即牙齿萌出顺序适应出生后的生长速度(舒尔茨AH。载于JM·坦纳编著的《人类生长》,第1 - 20页,1960年)。描述了110只豚尾猕猴恒牙萌出时个体成对顺序(例如,M I与I M)的频率,并与157只黑猩猩和≥6000个人类进行比较。此外,还重建了南方古猿和早期人类的牙龈萌出顺序。在这些狭鼻类灵长类动物中观察到的趋势表明,牙齿萌出顺序及其变异性可以通过一个牙齿萌出适应生长速度的简单模型来理解。随着出生后生长速度减慢,磨牙在顺序上会向后移动,要么总是在顺序上较晚萌出,要么在萌出方向上有所变化。“扩充顺序”(用关于变异性的符号书写的顺序)在识别进化趋势方面很重要;此外,它们常常会改变对不同分类单元之间异同的认知。尽管样本数量较少,但南方古猿比起现代人类,更类似于快速发育的猕猴属和黑猩猩属。© 1994威利 - 利斯公司。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验