• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

经导管主动脉瓣置换术术前评估联合非对比磁共振协议的技术可行性。

Technical Feasibility of a Combined Noncontrast Magnetic Resonance Protocol for Preoperative Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement Evaluation.

机构信息

Department of Radiology and Radiological Science, Division of Cardiovascular Imaging.

Unit of Radiology, IRCCS Policlinico San Donato, San Donato Milanese.

出版信息

J Thorac Imaging. 2018 Jan;33(1):60-67. doi: 10.1097/RTI.0000000000000278.

DOI:10.1097/RTI.0000000000000278
PMID:28549023
Abstract

PURPOSE

The aim of this study was to prospectively evaluate the technical feasibility of a noncontrast magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) protocol using investigational prototype self-navigated 3D (SN3D) radial whole-heart and quiescent-interval single-shot (QISS) pulse sequences regarding their potential in planning transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Five patients (76±7 y) with severe aortic valve stenosis and prior computed tomographic angiography (CTA) for TAVR planning and 10 healthy volunteers (28±6 y) underwent noncontrast MRA on a 1.5 T system. A SN3D whole-heart acquisition was used to assess the aortic root anatomy. Evaluation of the aortoiliac access route was performed with both SN3D and QISS. Measurements were compared among SN3D, QISS, and CTA using a paired t test or 1-way analysis of variance. Image quality ratings and contrast-to-noise ratios (CNR) were analyzed using Mann-Whitney U tests. Interobserver agreement was evaluated using Cohen's κ.

RESULTS

The combined SN3D and QISS protocol provided a 10.1±1.6-minute acquisition time. TAVR-relevant evaluation was technically feasible in healthy volunteers. All measurements showed good agreement with CTA in patients (all P>0.098). SN3D and QISS produced similar image quality both in volunteers and in patients (all P>0.122). There was no difference in qualitative ratings between MRA and CTA (all P>0.119). Interobserver agreement was good for MRA (κ=0.71 to 0.76) and excellent for CTA (κ=0.82 to 0.84). Thoracic SN3D provided a similar CNR compared with CTA (P=0.117). CTA yielded higher CNR in the abdominopelvic region compared with QISS (P=0.006).

CONCLUSIONS

A noncontrast MRA protocol combining SN3D and QISS acquisitions for the assessment of cardiac and vascular access route anatomy has technical feasibility for TAVR planning.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在前瞻性评估使用探索性原型自主导航 3D(SN3D)径向全心和静息间隔单次激发(QISS)脉冲序列的非对比磁共振血管造影(MRA)方案在经导管主动脉瓣置换术(TAVR)计划中的技术可行性。

材料与方法

5 例(76±7 岁)严重主动脉瓣狭窄患者,均有 TAVR 计划的计算机断层血管造影(CTA)检查,以及 10 例健康志愿者(28±6 岁),均在 1.5T 系统上进行非对比 MRA。采用 SN3D 全心采集评估主动脉根部解剖结构。使用 SN3D 和 QISS 评估主髂动脉入路。使用配对 t 检验或单因素方差分析比较 SN3D、QISS 和 CTA 之间的测量值。使用 Mann-Whitney U 检验分析图像质量评分和对比噪声比(CNR)。采用 Cohen's κ评估观察者间一致性。

结果

联合 SN3D 和 QISS 方案的采集时间为 10.1±1.6 分钟。健康志愿者的 TAVR 相关评估具有技术可行性。所有患者的测量值与 CTA 均具有良好的一致性(均 P>0.098)。SN3D 和 QISS 在志愿者和患者中均产生相似的图像质量(均 P>0.122)。MRA 和 CTA 的定性评分无差异(均 P>0.119)。观察者间对 MRA 的一致性良好(κ=0.71 至 0.76),对 CTA 的一致性极好(κ=0.82 至 0.84)。与 CTA 相比,SN3D 提供了类似的胸部 CNR(P=0.117)。与 QISS 相比,CTA 在腹盆区提供了更高的 CNR(P=0.006)。

结论

用于评估心脏和血管入路解剖结构的结合 SN3D 和 QISS 采集的非对比 MRA 方案具有 TAVR 计划的技术可行性。

相似文献

1
Technical Feasibility of a Combined Noncontrast Magnetic Resonance Protocol for Preoperative Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement Evaluation.经导管主动脉瓣置换术术前评估联合非对比磁共振协议的技术可行性。
J Thorac Imaging. 2018 Jan;33(1):60-67. doi: 10.1097/RTI.0000000000000278.
2
Non-contrast MRI protocol for TAVI guidance: quiescent-interval single-shot angiography in comparison with contrast-enhanced CT.用于 TAVI 引导的非对比 MRI 方案:静息期单次激发血管成像与对比增强 CT 的比较。
Eur Radiol. 2020 Sep;30(9):4847-4856. doi: 10.1007/s00330-020-06832-7. Epub 2020 Apr 22.
3
A non-contrast self-navigated 3-dimensional MR technique for aortic root and vascular access route assessment in the context of transcatheter aortic valve replacement: proof of concept.一种用于经导管主动脉瓣置换术中主动脉根部和血管入路评估的非对比自导航三维磁共振技术:概念验证
Eur Radiol. 2016 Apr;26(4):951-8. doi: 10.1007/s00330-015-3906-x. Epub 2015 Jul 20.
4
Accuracy of Noncontrast Quiescent-Interval Single-Shot Lower Extremity MR Angiography Versus CT Angiography for Diagnosis of Peripheral Artery Disease: Comparison With Digital Subtraction Angiography.非对比性静息期单次激发下肢磁共振血管成像与 CT 血管成像诊断外周动脉疾病的准确性:与数字减影血管造影的比较。
JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2017 Oct;10(10 Pt A):1116-1124. doi: 10.1016/j.jcmg.2016.09.030. Epub 2017 Jan 18.
5
Pre-procedural assessment of aortic annulus dimensions for transcatheter aortic valve replacement: comparison of a non-contrast 3D MRA protocol with contrast-enhanced cardiac dual-source CT angiography.经导管主动脉瓣置换术前主动脉瓣环尺寸的评估:非增强3D磁共振血管造影协议与对比增强心脏双源CT血管造影的比较
Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2016 Apr;17(4):458-66. doi: 10.1093/ehjci/jev188. Epub 2015 Jul 27.
6
Self-navigated versus navigator-gated 3D MRI sequence for non-enhanced aortic root measurement in transcatheter aortic valve implantation.经导管主动脉瓣植入术中非增强主动脉根部测量的自导航与导航门控 3D MRI 序列比较。
Eur J Radiol. 2021 Apr;137:109573. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2021.109573. Epub 2021 Jan 31.
7
Ferumoxytol MRA for transcatheter aortic valve replacement planning with renal insufficiency.利用铁羧麦芽糖磁共振血管造影术进行经导管主动脉瓣置换术规划以治疗肾功能不全。
Int J Cardiol. 2017 Mar 15;231:255-257. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2016.12.147. Epub 2016 Dec 30.
8
Clinical Value of Noncontrast-Enhanced Radial Quiescent-Interval Slice-Selective (QISS) Magnetic Resonance Angiography for the Diagnosis of Acute Pulmonary Embolism Compared to Contrast-Enhanced Computed Tomography and Cartesian Balanced Steady-State Free Precession.与对比增强计算机断层扫描和笛卡尔平衡稳态自由进动相比,非对比增强径向静止间期切片选择性(QISS)磁共振血管造影在急性肺栓塞诊断中的临床价值
J Magn Reson Imaging. 2020 Nov;52(5):1510-1524. doi: 10.1002/jmri.27240. Epub 2020 Jun 14.
9
Aortic annular dimensions by non-contrast MRI using k-t accelerated 3D cine b-SSFP in pre-procedural assessment for transcatheter aortic valve implantation: a technical feasibility study.经非对比 MRI 采用 k-t 加速 3D 电影 b-SSFP 技术在经导管主动脉瓣植入术前评估中的主动脉瓣环尺寸:一项技术可行性研究。
Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2021 Feb;37(2):651-661. doi: 10.1007/s10554-020-02038-6. Epub 2020 Sep 23.
10
Low contrast medium-volume third-generation dual-source computed tomography angiography for transcatheter aortic valve replacement planning.低对比剂用量的第三代双源计算机断层扫描血管造影术用于经导管主动脉瓣置换术的术前规划
Eur Radiol. 2017 May;27(5):1944-1953. doi: 10.1007/s00330-016-4537-6. Epub 2016 Aug 23.

引用本文的文献

1
Pre-Procedural Assessment of the Femoral Access Route for Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation: Comparison of a Non-Contrast Time-of-Flight Magnetic Resonance Angiography Protocol with Contrast-Enhanced Dual-Source Computed Tomography Angiography.经导管主动脉瓣植入术股动脉入路的术前评估:非对比时间飞跃磁共振血管造影协议与对比增强双源计算机断层血管造影的比较
J Clin Med. 2023 Oct 29;12(21):6824. doi: 10.3390/jcm12216824.
2
Multi-parametric approach to predict prosthetic valve size using CMR and clinical data: insights from SAVR.多参数方法结合 CMR 和临床数据预测人工瓣膜大小:来自 SAVR 的见解。
Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2021 Jul;37(7):2269-2276. doi: 10.1007/s10554-021-02203-5. Epub 2021 Mar 10.
3
Measurement accuracy of prototype non-contrast, compressed sensing-based, respiratory motion-resolved whole heart cardiovascular magnetic resonance angiography for the assessment of thoracic aortic dilatation: comparison with computed tomography angiography.
原型非对比、基于压缩感知、呼吸运动分辨率全心脏心血管磁共振血管造影术评估胸主动脉扩张的测量准确性:与计算机断层血管造影术的比较。
J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2021 Feb 8;23(1):7. doi: 10.1186/s12968-020-00697-x.
4
Accuracy of cardiac magnetic resonance generated 3D models of the aortic annulus compared to cardiovascular computed tomography generated 3D models.心脏磁共振生成的主动脉瓣环 3D 模型与心血管计算机断层扫描生成的 3D 模型的准确性比较。
Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2020 Oct;36(10):2007-2015. doi: 10.1007/s10554-020-01902-9. Epub 2020 May 30.
5
Non-contrast MRI protocol for TAVI guidance: quiescent-interval single-shot angiography in comparison with contrast-enhanced CT.用于 TAVI 引导的非对比 MRI 方案:静息期单次激发血管成像与对比增强 CT 的比较。
Eur Radiol. 2020 Sep;30(9):4847-4856. doi: 10.1007/s00330-020-06832-7. Epub 2020 Apr 22.