Strøm M, Lönn L, Bech B, Schroeder T V, Konge L
Copenhagen Academy for Medical Education and Simulation, The Capital Region of Denmark, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark; Department of Vascular Surgery, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark; University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark; Department of Radiology, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2017 Jul;54(1):34-41. doi: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2017.04.001. Epub 2017 May 23.
OBJECTIVE/BACKGROUND: To develop a procedure specific global rating scale for assessment of operator competence in endovascular aortic repair (EVAR).
A Delphi approach was used to achieve expert consensus. A panel of 32 international experts (median 300 EVAR procedures, range 200-3000) from vascular surgery (n = 21) and radiology (n = 11) was established. The first Delphi round was based on a review of endovascular skills assessment papers, stent graft instructions for use, and structured interviews. It led to a primary pool of 83 items that were formulated as global rating scale items with tentative anchors. Iterative Delphi rounds were executed. The panellists rated the importance of each item on a 5 point Likert scale. Consensus was defined as 80% of the panel rating an item 4 or 5 in the primary round and 90% in subsequent rounds. Consensus on the final assessment tool was defined as Cronbach's alpha > .8 after a minimum of three rounds.
Thirty-two of 35 invited experts participated. Three rounds of surveys were completed with a completion rate of 100% in the first two rounds and 91% in round three. The 83 primary assessment items were supplemented with five items suggested by the panel and reduced to seven pivotal assessment items that reached consensus, Cronbach's alpha = 0.82. The seven item rating scale covers key elements of competence in EVAR stent placement and deployment. Each item has well defined grades with explicit anchors at unacceptable, acceptable, and superior performance on a 5 point Likert scale.
The Delphi methodology allowed for international consensus on a new procedure specific global rating scale for assessment of competence in EVAR. The resulting scale, EndoVascular Aortic Repair Assessment of Technical Expertise (EVARATE), represents key elements in the procedure. EVARATE constitutes an assessment tool for providing structured feedback to endovascular operators in training.
目的/背景:制定一种用于评估血管腔内主动脉修复术(EVAR)术者能力的特定程序整体评分量表。
采用德尔菲法达成专家共识。组建了一个由32名国际专家组成的小组(血管外科21名,放射科11名,每位专家平均完成300例EVAR手术,范围为200 - 3000例)。第一轮德尔菲法基于对血管腔内技术评估论文、覆膜支架使用说明及结构化访谈的回顾。由此形成了一个包含83项内容的初始池,这些内容被制定为带有暂定锚点的整体评分量表项目。进行了多轮迭代德尔菲法。专家小组成员以5点李克特量表对每个项目的重要性进行评分。共识定义为第一轮中80%的专家将一个项目评为4或5分,后续轮次为90%。最终评估工具的共识定义为至少三轮后克朗巴哈系数>0.8。
35名受邀专家中有32名参与。完成了三轮调查,前两轮完成率为100%,第三轮为91%。83项初始评估项目经专家小组补充5项后,缩减为7项达成共识的关键评估项目,克朗巴哈系数 = 0.82。这个7项评分量表涵盖了EVAR支架置入和展开能力的关键要素。每个项目在5点李克特量表上都有明确界定的等级,在不可接受、可接受和卓越表现方面有明确的锚点。
德尔菲法使国际上就一种用于评估EVAR能力的新的特定程序整体评分量表达成了共识。由此产生的量表,即血管腔内主动脉修复技术专长评估量表(EVARATE),代表了该手术的关键要素。EVARATE构成了一种评估工具,可为接受培训的血管腔内手术操作者提供结构化反馈。