Strøm M, Lönn L, Bech B, Schroeder T V, Konge L
Copenhagen Academy for Medical Education and Simulation, The Capital Region of Denmark, Rigshospitalet, Blegdamsvej 9, 2100 Copenhagen, Denmark; Department of Vascular Surgery, Rigshospitalet, Blegdamsvej 9, 2100 Copenhagen, Denmark; University of Copenhagen, Blegdamsvej 3B, 2200 Copenhagen, Denmark.
University of Copenhagen, Blegdamsvej 3B, 2200 Copenhagen, Denmark; Department of Radiology, Rigshospitalet, Blegdamsvej 9, 2100 Copenhagen, Denmark.
Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2017 Jun;53(6):844-852. doi: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2017.03.007. Epub 2017 Apr 22.
The aims of this study were to develop a test of competence in endovascular aortic repair (EVAR) stent graft sizing and selection; to examine the test for evidence of validity; and to explore the experience required for the task.
The test was developed based on a literature review resulting in 22 anatomical assessment points and a graft selection. Validity evidence was explored in an international cross sectional study. Twenty-two consultants with varying levels of experience in the field (novices, intermediates, and experts) were presented with computed tomography angiography of the aortic vessels from three patients. Test scores were based on summed z-scores using the anatomical measurements and graft choices of the experts as a reference. A proficiency score was established using the contrasting groups standard setting method.
The assessment was shown to be reliable with an intraclass correlation coefficient of 0.83 (p<.001) and high internal consistency with a Cronbach's α of .91 (p<.001). Mann-Whitney U test showed that experts performed significantly better than novices and intermediates (p<.002 and p<.005, respectively). Regarding anatomical measurements, Mann-Whitney U test could discriminate between experts and novices (p=.002), between experts and intermediates (p=.010), and between novices and intermediates (p=.036). In stent selection the experts performed significantly better than both the novices and the intermediates (p=.002 and p=.007, respectively), while there was no significant difference between the two non-expert groups (p=1). A credible passing standard with appropriate consequences was established using the contrasting groups methods.
This study presents a standardised and objective assessment tool of competence in vessel analysis and stent graft selection for endovascular aortic repair. This was supported by strong validity evidence with good internal consistency and discriminatory ability. The tool may be used to facilitate training and certification of future endovascular specialists.
本研究旨在开发一项关于血管内主动脉修复术(EVAR)中支架移植物尺寸测量与选择能力的测试;检验该测试的有效性证据;并探索完成该任务所需的经验。
该测试基于文献综述开发,得出22个解剖学评估点及移植物选择。在一项国际横断面研究中探索有效性证据。向22位在该领域经验水平各异(新手、中级和专家)的顾问展示来自三名患者的主动脉血管计算机断层血管造影图像。测试分数基于使用专家的解剖学测量和移植物选择作为参考的z分数总和。使用对比组标准设定方法确定了一个熟练程度分数。
评估显示具有可靠性,组内相关系数为0.83(p<0.001),内部一致性高,Cronbach's α为0.91(p<0.001)。曼-惠特尼U检验表明专家的表现明显优于新手和中级人员(分别为p<0.002和p<0.005)。关于解剖学测量,曼-惠特尼U检验能够区分专家与新手(p = 0.002)、专家与中级人员(p = 0.010)以及新手与中级人员(p = 0.036)。在支架选择方面,专家的表现明显优于新手和中级人员(分别为p = 0.002和p = 0.007),而两个非专家组之间没有显著差异(p = 1)。使用对比组方法建立了具有适当后果的可信及格标准。
本研究提出了一种用于血管内主动脉修复术中血管分析和支架移植物选择能力的标准化、客观评估工具。这得到了强有力的有效性证据支持,具有良好的内部一致性和区分能力。该工具可用于促进未来血管内专家的培训和认证。