Casaletto K B, Marx G, Dutt S, Neuhaus J, Saloner R, Kritikos L, Miller B, Kramer J H
University of California, San Francisco, Department of Neurology, 675 Rising Nelson Lane, San Francisco, CA 94158 USA.
University of California, San Francisco, Department of Neurology, 675 Rising Nelson Lane, San Francisco, CA 94158 USA.
Neuropsychologia. 2017 Jul 28;102:19-28. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2017.05.021. Epub 2017 May 23.
Although commonly interpreted as a marker of episodic memory during neuropsychological exams, relatively little is known regarding the neurobehavior of "total learning" immediate recall scores. Medial temporal lobes are clearly associated with delayed recall performances, yet immediate recall may necessitate networks beyond traditional episodic memory. We aimed to operationalize cognitive and neuroanatomic correlates of total immediate recall in several aging syndromes. Demographically-matched neurologically normal adults (n=91), individuals with Alzheimer's disease (n=566), logopenic variant primary progressive aphasia (PPA) (n=34), behavioral variant frontotemporal dementia (n=97), semantic variant PPA (n=71), or nonfluent/agrammatic variant PPA (n=39) completed a neurocognitive battery, including the CVLT-Short Form trials 1-4 Total Immediate Recall; a majority subset also completed a brain MRI. Regressions covaried for age and sex, and MMSE in cognitive and total intracranial volume in neuroanatomic models. Neurologically normal adults demonstrated a heterogeneous pattern of cognitive associations with total immediate recall (executive, speed, delayed recall), such that no singular cognitive or neuroanatomic correlate uniquely predicted performance. Within the clinical cohorts, there were syndrome-specific cognitive and neural associations with total immediate recall; e.g., semantic processing was the strongest cognitive correlate in svPPA (partial r=0.41), while frontal volumes was the only meaningful neural correlate in bvFTD (partial r=0.20). Medial temporal lobes were not independently associated with total immediate recall in any group (ps>0.05). Multiple neurobehavioral systems are associated with "total learning" immediate recall scores that importantly differ across distinct clinical syndromes. Conventional memory networks may not be sufficient or even importantly contribute to total immediate recall in many syndromes. Interpreting learning scores as equivalent to episodic memory may be erroneous.
尽管在神经心理学检查中,“总学习”即时回忆分数常被视为情景记忆的一个指标,但对于其神经行为的了解相对较少。内侧颞叶显然与延迟回忆表现相关,但即时回忆可能需要超越传统情景记忆的神经网络。我们旨在明确几种衰老综合征中总即时回忆的认知和神经解剖学相关因素。选取了人口统计学特征匹配的神经功能正常的成年人(n = 91)、阿尔茨海默病患者(n = 566)、音韵变异型原发性进行性失语(PPA)患者(n = 34)、行为变异型额颞叶痴呆患者(n = 97)、语义变异型PPA患者(n = 71)或非流畅/语法缺失变异型PPA患者(n = 39),让他们完成一套神经认知测试,包括连续视觉语言学习测验简版(CVLT-Short Form)的第1 - 4次试验的总即时回忆;大部分受试者还进行了脑部MRI检查。回归分析对年龄、性别以及认知模型中的简易精神状态检查表(MMSE)和神经解剖学模型中的总颅内体积进行了协变量调整。神经功能正常的成年人在总即时回忆方面表现出与认知相关的异质性模式(执行功能、速度、延迟回忆),以至于没有单一的认知或神经解剖学相关因素能唯一预测其表现。在临床队列中,总即时回忆存在特定综合征的认知和神经关联;例如,语义加工是语义变异型PPA中最强的认知相关因素(偏相关系数r = 0.41),而额叶体积是行为变异型额颞叶痴呆中唯一有意义的神经相关因素(偏相关系数r = 0.20)。在任何组中,内侧颞叶均与总即时回忆无独立关联(p值>0.05)。多个神经行为系统与“总学习”即时回忆分数相关,且在不同临床综合征中存在重要差异。在许多综合征中,传统记忆网络可能并不充分,甚至对总即时回忆没有重要贡献。将学习分数等同于情景记忆可能是错误的。