Gifford Katherine A, Liu Dandan, Damon Stephen M, Chapman William G, Romano Iii Raymond R, Samuels Lauren R, Lu Zengqi, Jefferson Angela L
Vanderbilt Memory & Alzheimer's Center, Department of Neurology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA.
Vanderbilt Memory & Alzheimer's Center, Department of Neurology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA Department of Biostatistics, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA.
J Alzheimers Dis. 2015;44(1):309-18. doi: 10.3233/JAD-140636.
A cognitive concern from the patient, informant, or clinician is required for the diagnosis of mild cognitive impairment (MCI); however, the cognitive and neuroanatomical correlates of complaint are poorly understood.
We assessed how self-complaint relates to cognitive and neuroimaging measures in older adults with MCI.
MCI participants were drawn from the Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative and dichotomized into two groups based on the presence of self-reported memory complaint (no complaint n = 191, 77 ± 7 years; complaint n = 206, 73 ± 8 years). Cognitive outcomes included episodic memory, executive functioning, information processing speed, and language. Imaging outcomes included regional lobar volumes (frontal, parietal, temporal, cingulate) and specific medial temporal lobe structures (hippocampal volume, entorhinal cortex thickness, parahippocampal gyrus thickness).
Linear regressions, adjusting for age, gender, race, education, Mini-Mental State Examination score, mood, and apolipoprotein E4 status, found that cognitive complaint related to immediate (β = -1.07, p < 0.001) and delayed episodic memory performances assessed on a serial list learning task (β = -1.06, p = 0.001) but no other cognitive measures or neuroimaging markers.
Self-reported memory concern was unrelated to structural neuroimaging markers of atrophy and measures of information processing speed, executive functioning, or language. In contrast, subjective memory complaint related to objective verbal episodic learning performance. Future research is warranted to better understand the relation between cognitive complaint and surrogate markers of abnormal brain aging, including Alzheimer's disease, across the cognitive aging spectrum.
轻度认知障碍(MCI)的诊断需要患者、 informant 或临床医生存在认知方面的担忧;然而,对于担忧的认知和神经解剖学相关性知之甚少。
我们评估了 MCI 老年人的自我担忧与认知及神经影像学测量之间的关系。
MCI 参与者来自阿尔茨海默病神经影像学计划,并根据自我报告的记忆担忧情况分为两组(无担忧组 n = 191,年龄 77 ± 7 岁;有担忧组 n = 206,年龄 73 ± 8 岁)。认知结果包括情景记忆、执行功能、信息处理速度和语言能力。影像学结果包括脑叶区域体积(额叶、顶叶、颞叶、扣带回)和特定的内侧颞叶结构(海马体积、内嗅皮质厚度、海马旁回厚度)。
在对年龄、性别、种族、教育程度、简易精神状态检查表得分、情绪和载脂蛋白 E4 状态进行调整的线性回归分析中,发现认知担忧与在系列列表学习任务中评估的即时(β = -1.07,p < 0.001)和延迟情景记忆表现相关(β = -1.06,p = 0.001),但与其他认知测量或神经影像学标志物无关。
自我报告的记忆担忧与萎缩的结构性神经影像学标志物以及信息处理速度、执行功能或语言能力的测量无关。相比之下,主观记忆担忧与客观言语情景学习表现相关。有必要进行未来研究,以更好地理解在整个认知老化范围内,认知担忧与异常脑老化的替代标志物(包括阿尔茨海默病)之间的关系。