Suppr超能文献

[法国关于出生时会阴保护的哪些措施是达成共识的?德尔菲调查结果]

[What measures of perineal protection at birth are consensual in France? Results of a Delphi survey].

作者信息

de Tayrac R, Carligny L, Zimmerman R, Huberlant S, Letouzey V

机构信息

Service de gynécologie-obstétrique, CHU Carémeau, place du Pr-R-Debré, 30029 Nîmes cedex 9, France.

École de Maïeutique, faculté de médecine Montpellier-Nîmes, 186, chemin du Carreau-de-Lanes, 30900 Nîmes, France.

出版信息

Prog Urol. 2017 Jun;27(7):413-423. doi: 10.1016/j.purol.2017.04.003. Epub 2017 May 24.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate expert's opinion in order to obtain a consensus on the different measures of perineal protection at the time of vaginal delivery.

METHODS

A survey using the Delphi method was carried out with a panel of French obstetricians, urogynecologists and midwives. The questionnaire included 22 questions grouped into four groups: expulsive efforts, indications of episiotomy, episiotomy repair and other forms of perineal protection. The experts had to answer on a 9-point scale, both on the validity and the clarity of each proposal. After analysis of the replies of the first round, a second round was sent to the same experts for certain proposals. Each turn was the subject of two raises. To be validated, each proposal had to obtain a median equal to or greater than 7/9 and an agreement between the experts greater than 65% in the first round, and more than 75% in the second round.

RESULTS

The study was conducted between March and October 2016. Of the 300 experts initially selected, 93 (31%) responded to the first round, including 63 obstetricians (67.7%), 12 urogynecologists (12.9%) and 18 midwives (19.4%). In the second round, 72 experts replied, representing 77.4% of the experts who also answered the first round. At the end of the two rounds, 11 proposals were validated, and 11 rejected. The following recommendations have been validated. Uterine expression should be proscribed. The two modes of pushing (blocked in Valsalva and by blowing) can be indifferently proposed, in case of fetal progression and in the absence of fetal distress. The midline episiotomy should be proscribed. The medio-lateral (or lateral) episiotomy should be left to the discretion of the accoucheur. The maintenance of the fetal head with one hand must be systematic to the expulsion to protect the perineum. Repair of the episiotomy should be made (except in some cases) with a rapid absorbable suture. The prescription of NSAIDs and/or painkillers of level 2 should be preferred to reduce the pain of post-natal perineal scars.

CONCLUSION

Several measures of perineal protection at the time of vaginal delivery are consensual in France. Other measures should be studied further.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

摘要

目的

评估专家意见,以便就阴道分娩时会阴保护的不同措施达成共识。

方法

采用德尔菲法对一组法国产科医生、泌尿妇科医生和助产士进行了一项调查。问卷包括22个问题,分为四组:用力分娩、会阴切开术指征、会阴切开术修复和其他形式的会阴保护。专家们必须在9分制上回答每个提议的有效性和清晰度。在分析第一轮的回复后,将第二轮问卷发送给同一批专家,针对某些提议进行询问。每一轮都进行了两次提问。为了得到验证,每个提议在第一轮中必须获得中位数等于或大于7/9,且专家之间的一致性大于65%,在第二轮中大于75%。

结果

该研究于2016年3月至10月进行。最初选定的300名专家中,93名(31%)回复了第一轮,其中包括63名产科医生(67.7%)、12名泌尿妇科医生(12.9%)和18名助产士(19.4%)。在第二轮中,72名专家回复,占第一轮回复专家的77.4%。两轮结束时,11项提议得到验证,11项被否决。以下建议得到了验证。应禁止子宫按压。在胎儿进展且无胎儿窘迫的情况下,可以无差别地采用两种用力方式(瓦尔萨尔瓦屏气法和吹气法)。应禁止正中会阴切开术。中侧(或侧切)会阴切开术应由接生人员自行决定。在娩出胎儿时,必须始终用一只手托住胎头以保护会阴。(某些情况除外)会阴切开术应采用快速可吸收缝线进行缝合。应优先开具非甾体抗炎药和/或2级止痛药以减轻产后会阴瘢痕的疼痛。

结论

法国在阴道分娩时的几种会阴保护措施已达成共识。其他措施应进一步研究。

证据级别

4级。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验