• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

制定一项核心结局集,用于法国一项前瞻性研究,该研究旨在探讨会阴侧切术对经阴道分娩时产科肛门括约肌损伤的影响(INSTRUMODA)。

A core outcome set development for a French national prospective study about the effect of mediolateral episiotomy on obstetric anal sphincter injury during operative vaginal delivery (INSTRUMODA).

机构信息

Poitiers University Hospital, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Poitiers, France.

INSERM CIC-P 1402, Poitiers University Hospital, Poitiers, France.

出版信息

BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2021 Mar 25;21(1):251. doi: 10.1186/s12884-021-03603-0.

DOI:10.1186/s12884-021-03603-0
PMID:33765964
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7993449/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

We aimed at developing a core outcome and variables of interest set to investigate the effects of mediolateral episiotomy on Obstetric Anal Sphincter Injury (OASI) during and after operative delivery in nulliparous women in a large-scale one-year observational French study including 15,000 women (INSTRUMODA).

METHODS

A list of outcomes and variables of interest was suggested to obstetricians participating in the INSTRUMODA study using online questionnaires divided into 7 categories: the woman's history and course of pregnancy, course of labor, modalities of operative delivery, episiotomy characteristics, immediate maternal morbidity, one-year maternal morbidity, immediate neonatal morbidity. We used a three-round DELPHI method to reach a consensus. In the first round, outcomes and variables considered as essential by 70% or more of obstetricians were included in the corpus whereas they were excluded when 70% rated them as "not important". In the second round, non-consensual outcomes and variables were reassessed and excluded or definitively included if considered as "not important" or essential by 50% or more of the obstetricians. During the first round, obstetricians were invited to suggest new outcomes and/or variables that were then assessed in the second and third round. We used the same method to develop a core outcome and variables of interest set in a population of women in the community recruited via an association of patients. At the end of the procedure the core outcome and variables of interest sets were merged to provide the final core outcome set for the INSTRUMODA study.

RESULTS

Fifty-three obstetricians and 16 women filled out questionnaires. After the 3 rounds of Delphi procedure in each population, 74 outcomes and variables were consensually reported by obstetricians and 92 by women in the community. By mixing these two consensual corpora we reported a final consensual list of 114 variables of interest and outcomes for both obstetricians and women.

CONCLUSION

We established a core outcome and variables of interest set among obstetricians and women in the community to investigate the association between mediolateral episiotomy and OASI during operative delivery.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

The INSTRUMODA study was registered on https://clinicaltrials.gov on June 25, 2020 ( NCT04446780 ).

摘要

背景

我们旨在制定一套核心结局和关注变量,以在一项大型为期一年的法国观察性研究中,针对初产妇行会阴侧切术对产科肛门括约肌损伤(OASI)的影响进行研究,该研究纳入了 15000 名女性(INSTRUMODA)。

方法

通过在线问卷,向参与 INSTRUMODA 研究的产科医生提出了一套结局和关注变量的清单,问卷分为 7 个类别:女性的妊娠史和病程、分娩过程、剖宫产方式、会阴侧切特征、产妇即时发病率、产妇一年期发病率、新生儿即时发病率。我们使用三轮 DELPHI 方法达成共识。在第一轮中,被 70%或更多的产科医生认为是必不可少的结局和变量被纳入核心内容,而被 70%的医生认为是“不重要”的结局和变量则被排除在外。在第二轮中,对未达成共识的结局和变量进行重新评估,如果被 50%或更多的产科医生认为是“不重要”或“必不可少”,则将其纳入或最终纳入核心内容。在第一轮中,还邀请了产科医生提出新的结局和/或变量,然后在第二轮和第三轮中对这些变量进行评估。我们使用相同的方法,为通过患者协会招募的社区妇女群体制定了一套核心结局和关注变量。在程序结束时,将社区妇女群体的核心结局和关注变量集与 INSTRUMODA 研究的核心结局集合并,为 INSTRUMODA 研究提供最终的核心结局集。

结果

53 名产科医生和 16 名妇女填写了问卷。在每个群体的三轮 Delphi 程序之后,产科医生一致报告了 74 个结局和变量,社区妇女一致报告了 92 个结局和变量。通过混合这两个一致的内容,我们报告了一个最终的共识列表,其中包含 114 个产科医生和社区妇女关注的结局和变量。

结论

我们在产科医生和社区妇女中建立了一套核心结局和关注变量,以研究会阴侧切术与剖宫产术中产科肛门括约肌损伤(OASI)的关联。

试验注册

INSTRUMODA 研究于 2020 年 6 月 25 日在 https://clinicaltrials.gov 上注册(NCT04446780)。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0a06/7993449/c555b2f3d1b8/12884_2021_3603_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0a06/7993449/b6b091ecadcc/12884_2021_3603_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0a06/7993449/c555b2f3d1b8/12884_2021_3603_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0a06/7993449/b6b091ecadcc/12884_2021_3603_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0a06/7993449/c555b2f3d1b8/12884_2021_3603_Fig2_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
A core outcome set development for a French national prospective study about the effect of mediolateral episiotomy on obstetric anal sphincter injury during operative vaginal delivery (INSTRUMODA).制定一项核心结局集,用于法国一项前瞻性研究,该研究旨在探讨会阴侧切术对经阴道分娩时产科肛门括约肌损伤的影响(INSTRUMODA)。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2021 Mar 25;21(1):251. doi: 10.1186/s12884-021-03603-0.
2
The association of obstetric anal sphincter injury and mediolateral episiotomy with increasing birth weight and duration of second stage of labour in spontaneous vaginal delivery.产科肛门括约肌损伤和会阴正中切开术与自发性阴道分娩中出生体重增加和第二产程延长的关系。
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2024 Nov;302:294-300. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2024.09.021. Epub 2024 Sep 20.
3
Does the implementation of a restrictive episiotomy policy for operative deliveries increase the risk of obstetric anal sphincter injury?实行限制会阴切开术的分娩政策是否会增加产科肛门括约肌损伤的风险?
Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2019 Jul;300(1):87-94. doi: 10.1007/s00404-019-05174-0. Epub 2019 May 5.
4
Mediolateral episiotomy and risk of obstetric anal sphincter injuries and adverse neonatal outcomes during operative vaginal delivery in nulliparous women: a propensity-score analysis.会阴正中切开术与经阴道分娩时初产妇产科肛门括约肌损伤及不良新生儿结局的关系:倾向评分分析。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2022 Jan 19;22(1):48. doi: 10.1186/s12884-022-04396-6.
5
Could the correct side of mediolateral episiotomy be determined according to anal sphincter EMG?能否根据肛门括约肌肌电图确定会阴侧切术的正确侧切部位?
Int Urogynecol J. 2018 Oct;29(10):1501-1507. doi: 10.1007/s00192-018-3560-3. Epub 2018 Feb 26.
6
Mediolateral/lateral episiotomy with operative vaginal delivery and the risk reduction of obstetric anal sphincter injury (OASI): A systematic review and meta-analysis.会阴正中切开术/外侧切开术联合产道助产分娩与产科肛门括约肌损伤(OASI)风险降低的关系:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Int Urogynecol J. 2022 Jun;33(6):1393-1405. doi: 10.1007/s00192-022-05145-1. Epub 2022 Apr 15.
7
Predictive factors for obstetric anal sphincter injury in primiparous women: systematic review and meta-analysis.初产妇产科肛门括约肌损伤的预测因素:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2023 Oct;62(4):486-496. doi: 10.1002/uog.26292.
8
Could a mediolateral episiotomy prevent obstetric anal sphincter injury?会阴正中切开术能否预防产科肛门括约肌损伤?
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2010 Jun;150(2):142-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2010.03.002. Epub 2010 Mar 31.
9
Risk factors for obstetric anal sphincter injury: a prospective study.产科肛门括约肌损伤的危险因素:一项前瞻性研究。
Birth. 2006 Jun;33(2):117-22. doi: 10.1111/j.0730-7659.2006.00088.x.
10
Is episiotomy worthwile to prevent obstetric anal sphincter injury during operative vaginal delivery in nulliparous women?对于未生育过的女性,在阴道助产术中行会阴切开术以预防产科肛门括约肌损伤是否值得?
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2019 Jan;232:60-64. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2018.11.014. Epub 2018 Nov 14.

引用本文的文献

1
Caesarean section and anal incontinence in women after obstetric anal sphincter injury: A systematic review and meta-analysis.产科肛门括约肌损伤后女性的剖宫产与肛门失禁:一项系统评价和荟萃分析
BJOG. 2025 Jul;132(8):1032-1044. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.17899. Epub 2024 Jul 4.
2
A balanced perspective on intervention at full dilation.关于完全扩张时干预的平衡观点。
CMAJ. 2022 Sep 6;194(34):E1173. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.146831-l.
3
French guidelines for restrictive episiotomy during instrumental delivery were not followed by an increase in obstetric anal sphincter injury.

本文引用的文献

1
Assessing the impact of a research funder's recommendation to consider core outcome sets.评估研究资助者建议考虑核心结局集的影响。
PLoS One. 2019 Sep 13;14(9):e0222418. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0222418. eCollection 2019.
2
The role of mediolateral episiotomy during operative vaginal delivery.会阴正中切开术在经阴道分娩中的作用。
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2019 Sep;240:192-196. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2019.07.005. Epub 2019 Jul 9.
3
Does the implementation of a restrictive episiotomy policy for operative deliveries increase the risk of obstetric anal sphincter injury?
器械助产时遵循法国限制性会阴切开术指南,并未导致产科肛门括约肌损伤增加。
Sci Rep. 2022 Apr 15;12(1):6330. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-10379-6.
4
Prospective observational study investigating the effectiveness, safety, women's experiences and quality of life at 3 months regarding cervical ripening methods for induction of labor at term-The MATUCOL study protocol.一项关于足月引产时宫颈成熟方法的有效性、安全性、女性体验和 3 个月时生活质量的前瞻性观察研究——MATUCOL 研究方案。
PLoS One. 2022 Jan 21;17(1):e0262292. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0262292. eCollection 2022.
5
Core Outcome Sets (COS) related to pregnancy and childbirth: a systematic review.与妊娠和分娩相关的核心结局集(COS):系统评价。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2021 Oct 9;21(1):691. doi: 10.1186/s12884-021-04164-y.
实行限制会阴切开术的分娩政策是否会增加产科肛门括约肌损伤的风险?
Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2019 Jul;300(1):87-94. doi: 10.1007/s00404-019-05174-0. Epub 2019 May 5.
4
Perineal prevention and protection in obstetrics: CNGOF clinical practice guidelines.产科会阴预防与保护:CNGOF临床实践指南
J Gynecol Obstet Hum Reprod. 2019 Sep;48(7):455-460. doi: 10.1016/j.jogoh.2018.12.002. Epub 2018 Dec 12.
5
Are we performing episiotomies correctly? A study to evaluate French technique in a high-risk maternity unit.我们的会阴切开术操作是否正确?一项在高危产科病房评估法国技术的研究。
J Gynecol Obstet Hum Reprod. 2018 Sep;47(7):331-338. doi: 10.1016/j.jogoh.2018.04.010. Epub 2018 Apr 20.
6
[Anal incontinence and obstetrical anal sphincter injuries, epidemiology and prevention].[肛门失禁与产科肛门括约肌损伤:流行病学与预防]
Gynecol Obstet Fertil Senol. 2018 Apr;46(4):419-426. doi: 10.1016/j.gofs.2018.01.004. Epub 2018 Feb 28.
7
The effectiveness of mediolateral episiotomy in preventing obstetric anal sphincter injuries during operative vaginal delivery: a ten-year analysis of a national registry.会阴侧切术在预防阴道助产分娩时产科肛门括约肌损伤中的有效性:一项基于国家登记处的十年分析
Int Urogynecol J. 2018 Mar;29(3):407-413. doi: 10.1007/s00192-017-3422-4. Epub 2017 Jul 18.
8
The COMET Handbook: version 1.0.《COMET手册:第1.0版》
Trials. 2017 Jun 20;18(Suppl 3):280. doi: 10.1186/s13063-017-1978-4.
9
Selective versus routine use of episiotomy for vaginal birth.经阴道分娩时会阴切开术的选择性使用与常规使用
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Feb 8;2(2):CD000081. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD000081.pub3.
10
Core Outcome Set-STAndards for Reporting: The COS-STAR Statement.核心结局集报告标准:COS-STAR声明
PLoS Med. 2016 Oct 18;13(10):e1002148. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1002148. eCollection 2016 Oct.