Suppr超能文献

对不同颜色饱和度测量方法的评估。

An evaluation of different measures of color saturation.

作者信息

Schiller Florian, Valsecchi Matteo, Gegenfurtner Karl R

机构信息

Department of Psychology, Justus Liebig University Giessen, Giessen, Germany.

Department of Psychology, Justus Liebig University Giessen, Giessen, Germany.

出版信息

Vision Res. 2018 Oct;151:117-134. doi: 10.1016/j.visres.2017.04.012. Epub 2017 Jun 9.

Abstract

We investigated how well seven saturation measures defined in CIECAM02, HSV, DKL, LAB, LUV, and CIE 1931 xyY color spaces correspond to human perception of saturation. We used a paradigm that allowed us to measure the perceived saturation of several standard color stimuli in many different directions of color space. We implemented this paradigm at different levels of luminance and varied background luminance relative to the luminance of our color stimuli in order to ensure the generality of our approach. We found that varying background luminance changed the relative saturation of the standard colors. Raising the overall luminance level did not have such an effect. We compared the results of our measurements to the predictions of the seven saturation measures. All of the measures could predict our observers' judgments of saturation reasonably well. The measures that are based on measurements of discrimination thresholds (LUV, LAB, CIECAM02) performed best on average. However, some of the perceptual effects induced by changing background luminance could not be predicted by any measure.

摘要

我们研究了在CIECAM02、HSV、DKL、LAB、LUV和CIE 1931 xyY颜色空间中定义的七种饱和度度量与人类对饱和度的感知之间的对应程度。我们采用了一种范式,使我们能够在颜色空间的许多不同方向上测量几种标准颜色刺激的感知饱和度。我们在不同的亮度水平下实施了这种范式,并相对于颜色刺激的亮度改变背景亮度,以确保我们方法的通用性。我们发现,改变背景亮度会改变标准颜色的相对饱和度。提高整体亮度水平则没有这种效果。我们将测量结果与七种饱和度度量的预测进行了比较。所有这些度量都能较好地预测我们观察者对饱和度的判断。基于辨别阈值测量的度量(LUV、LAB、CIECAM02)平均表现最佳。然而,任何度量都无法预测由改变背景亮度引起的一些感知效应。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验