Zhu Xiang-Lan, Gao Li-Min, Li Fen, Liu Wei-Ping, Zhang Wen-Yan, Li Gan-Di, Zhang Xiu-Hui, Chen Min, Liu Xiao-Yu, Zhao Sha
Department of Pathology, West China Hospital of Sichuan University, Chengdu 610041, China.
Department of Pathology, ChengDu Second People's Hospital of China, Chengdu 610041, China.
Pathol Res Pract. 2017 Jun;213(6):598-605. doi: 10.1016/j.prp.2017.05.003. Epub 2017 May 13.
It is a great challenge for pathologists to initially diagnose metastatic malignant mesothelioma (MM) by the lymph node biopsy without any history of primary MM. Because the onset of MM is hidden and the metastatic MM in lymph node is relatively uncommon. Besides, morphologic and immuohistochemistry features of MM are similar to other tumors.
In order to improve the initial diagnostic accuracy of metastatic MM from LN biopsy and to reduce or avoid the possibility of missed diagnosis or misdiagnosis, we had collected the clinical and pathological data of the metastatic MM cases in our department, and summarized the characteristics of morphological, immunohistochemical and fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) results.
Seven patients (4 males and 3 females) with 21-73 year-old had been included in our study. Six cases showed serous cavity effusion, serosal thickening and systemic multiple lymph node enlargement. The "moderate, nice" tumor cells were arranged in variable patterns. Mitosis was hardly to be found and necrosis was absent. Four immunohistochemical staining panels and FISH detection had been used for diagnosis and differential diagnosis of MM. All cases expressed broad-spectrum epithelial markers and at least 2 mesothelial-cell-origin markers. None were positive for specific-tissue-origin markers, and all cases were diagnosed of malignancy according to immunohistochemical markers and detection of pl6 gene deletion.
It is necessary for us to keep our awareness of metastatic MM in lymph node. Correct diagnosis of MM metastasis by lymph node biopsy were based on detailed understanding of the clinical manifestation and the image data, careful observation of morphologic characteristics, and properly using immunohistochemical markers or FISH detection if necessary for diagnosis and differential diagnosis.
