Faculty of Pharmacy and Biochemistry, University of Zagreb, A. Kovačića 1, HR-1000 Zagreb, Croatia.
Faculty of Pharmacy and Biochemistry, University of Zagreb, A. Kovačića 1, HR-1000 Zagreb, Croatia.
Res Social Adm Pharm. 2018 May;14(5):441-450. doi: 10.1016/j.sapharm.2017.05.010. Epub 2017 May 22.
Formal training in pharmacy ethics is relatively new in Croatia, and the professional code of ethics is more than 20 years old. Very little is known about how practicing pharmacists implement ethical considerations and relevant professional guidelines in their work.
This study aimed to provide the first description of the perceptions and attitudes of Croatian community pharmacists toward ethics in pharmacy practice, how often they face certain ethical dilemmas and how they resolve them.
A cross-sectional survey of 252 community pharmacists, including community pharmacists and pre-licensing trainees, was conducted in Zagreb, Croatia. This group accounts for 18% of licensed pharmacists in Croatia. The survey questions included four sections: general sociodemographic information, multiple-choice questions, pre-defined ethical scenarios, and ethical scenarios filled in by respondents.
More than half of pharmacists (62.7%) face ethical dilemmas in everyday work. Nearly all (94.4%) are familiar with the current professional code of ethics in Croatia, but only 47.6% think that the code reflects the changes that the pharmacy profession faces today. Most pharmacists (83.3%) solve ethical dilemmas on their own, while nearly the same proportion (75.4%) think that they are not adequately trained to deal with ethical dilemmas. The pre-defined ethical scenarios experienced by the largest proportion of pharmacists are being asked to dispense a drug to someone other than the patient (93.3%), an unnecessary over-the-counter medicine (84.3%), a generic medicine clinically equivalent to the prescribed one (79.4%), or hormonal contraception over the counter (70.4%).
The results demonstrate a need to improve formal pharmacy ethics education and training in how to assess ethical issues and make appropriate decisions, which implies the need for stronger collaboration between pharmacists and their professional association. Our results also highlight an urgent need to revise and update the Croatian code of ethics for pharmacists.
在克罗地亚,药学伦理学的正规培训相对较新,职业道德准则已有 20 多年的历史。关于执业药师如何在工作中实施伦理考虑和相关专业准则,人们知之甚少。
本研究旨在首次描述克罗地亚社区药师对药学实践中伦理问题的看法和态度,他们在日常工作中遇到某些伦理困境的频率以及他们如何解决这些困境。
在克罗地亚萨格勒布对 252 名社区药师(包括社区药师和许可前培训生)进行了横断面调查。这一群体占克罗地亚持照药师的 18%。调查问题包括四个部分:一般社会人口学信息、多项选择题、预先定义的伦理情景和受访者填写的伦理情景。
超过一半的药师(62.7%)在日常工作中面临伦理困境。几乎所有(94.4%)的药师都熟悉克罗地亚现行的职业道德准则,但只有 47.6%的药师认为该准则反映了当今药学专业面临的变化。大多数药师(83.3%)自行解决伦理困境,而几乎相同比例(75.4%)的药师认为他们没有接受充分的培训来处理伦理困境。药师经历最多的预设伦理情景是被要求向患者以外的人配药(93.3%)、开不必要的非处方药(84.3%)、开与处方药物临床等效的仿制药(79.4%)或开非处方激素避孕药(70.4%)。
结果表明需要改进正规药学伦理学教育和培训,以评估伦理问题并做出适当决策,这意味着需要药师及其专业协会之间加强合作。我们的结果还突出表明迫切需要修订和更新克罗地亚药师职业道德准则。