Suppr超能文献

对药学职业道德决策和 APhA 伦理准则的评论。

A commentary on ethical decision-making in the pharmacy profession and the APhA Code of Ethics.

出版信息

J Am Pharm Assoc (2003). 2021 Mar-Apr;61(2):e68-e70. doi: 10.1016/j.japh.2020.10.021. Epub 2020 Nov 20.

Abstract

The American Pharmacists Association Code of Ethics ("Code") was established in 1852 and has undergone 5 modifications, most recently in 1994. As point of care shifts from product to cognitive clinical service, pharmacists are expected to encounter an increasing quantity and complexity of ethical and moral dilemmas. In view of this professional transformation and current worldwide challenges, this seems an appropriate time for dialogue on a modification of the Code. The 3 important questions before the profession are as follows: (1) Is the scope of available ethical guidance adequate? (2) Are pharmacists competent in ethical decision-making? (3) Is current pharmacy education and training adequately preparing students for ethical decision-making? The first question is included as part of the Pharmacy Law, Ethics, and Risk course at the University of Utah College of Pharmacy. The following commentary is based on a student's persuasive paper that the Code should remain unmodified owing to the following factors: greater detail does not ensure improved guidance, and modification may lead to confusion in professional role and responsibilities and may not consider patients' values and preferences in decision-making. To improve ethical decision-making in the pharmacy profession, this commentary further suggests that questions 2 and 3 are key to facilitating improved readiness and competency in pharmacists' ethical decision-making. Pharmacy students should be given a more thorough education in ethics, and practicing pharmacists should continually expand their knowledge and continued professional development in ethics.

摘要

美国药剂师协会道德规范(“规范”)于 1852 年制定,已经历 5 次修订,最近一次是在 1994 年。随着护理点从产品向认知临床服务转移,药剂师预计将遇到越来越多且越来越复杂的道德和伦理困境。鉴于这种专业转型和当前全球挑战,现在似乎是就规范的修订进行对话的合适时机。该专业面临的三个重要问题如下:(1)现有的道德指导是否充分?(2)药剂师是否有能力进行道德决策?(3)当前的药学教育和培训是否充分为学生进行道德决策做好准备?第一个问题包含在犹他大学药学院的《药房法、道德和风险》课程中。本评论基于学生的一篇有说服力的论文,即由于以下因素,规范应保持不变:更详细的信息并不保证更好的指导,修改可能导致专业角色和责任混淆,并且在决策时可能不考虑患者的价值观和偏好。为了提高药学专业的道德决策能力,本评论进一步建议,问题 2 和 3 是促进药师道德决策能力提高和准备的关键。应向药学学生提供更深入的伦理学教育,执业药剂师应不断扩大其在伦理学方面的知识和持续专业发展。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验