Abedi Iraj, Tavakkoli Mohammad B, Jabbari Keyvan, Amouheidari Alireza, Yadegarfard Ghasem
Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran.
Isfahan Milad Hospital, Isfahan, Iran.
J Med Signals Sens. 2017 Apr-Jun;7(2):114-121.
Radiotherapy is one of the treatment options for locally advanced prostate cancer; however, with standard radiation doses, it is not always very effective. One of the strategies to improve the efficiency of radiotherapy is increasing the dose. In this study, to increase tumor local control rates, a new radiotherapy method, known as dose painting (DP), was investigated. To compare 3-dimensional conformal radiotherapy (3D-CRT) and intensity modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) plans with DP for prostate cancer. Twenty-four consecutive patients with locally advanced prostate cancer who underwent an multiparametric-magnetic resonance imaging (MP-MRI) (Tw, diffusion weighted image, dynamic contrast enhancement, and MRS) scan before a diagnostic biopsy from September 2015 to April 2016 were invited to take part in this study. The tumor local control probability (TCP) values for 3D-CRT, IMRT, and DP techniques were 45, 56, and 77%, respectively. The DP technique had a 37.5 and 71% higher TCP than IMRT and 3D-CRT, and these differences were statistically significant ( = 0.001). The mean normal tissue complication probability (NTCP) values of the organ at risks for 3D-CRT, IMRT, and DP showed that there were statistically significant differences among them in three plans ( = 0.01). DP by contours using MP-MRI is technically feasible. This study evaluated biological modeling based on both MP-MRI defined subvolumes and pathologically defined subvolumes. The MP-MRI-guided DP results in better TCP/NTCP than 3D-CRT and IMRT.
放射治疗是局部晚期前列腺癌的治疗选择之一;然而,采用标准放射剂量时,其效果并不总是十分理想。提高放射治疗效率的策略之一是增加剂量。在本研究中,为提高肿瘤局部控制率,对一种名为剂量勾画(DP)的新型放射治疗方法进行了研究。比较前列腺癌三维适形放疗(3D-CRT)和调强放疗(IMRT)计划与剂量勾画的效果。邀请了2015年9月至2016年4月期间在诊断性活检前接受多参数磁共振成像(MP-MRI)(T2加权成像、扩散加权成像、动态对比增强和磁共振波谱)扫描的24例连续的局部晚期前列腺癌患者参与本研究。3D-CRT、IMRT和DP技术的肿瘤局部控制概率(TCP)值分别为45%、56%和77%。DP技术的TCP分别比IMRT和3D-CRT高37.5%和71%,且这些差异具有统计学意义(P = 0.001)。3D-CRT、IMRT和DP的危及器官的平均正常组织并发症概率(NTCP)值显示,三种计划之间存在统计学显著差异(P = 0.01)。使用MP-MRI通过勾画轮廓进行剂量勾画在技术上是可行的。本研究评估了基于MP-MRI定义的子体积和病理定义的子体积的生物学模型。MP-MRI引导的剂量勾画比3D-CRT和IMRT产生更好的TCP/NTCP。