a Department of Medicine, Albert Einstein College of Medicine , Bronx , NY , USA.
b Department of Epidemiology and Population Health, Albert Einstein College of Medicine , Bronx , NY , USA.
Med Teach. 2017 Sep;39(9):931-935. doi: 10.1080/0142159X.2017.1332361. Epub 2017 May 27.
This study assesses the effectiveness of a GOSCE in teaching medical students clinical communication, as well as group collaboration and peer feedback.
The GOSCE was administered during the Internal Medicine clerkship. Groups consisted of 4-6 students and one faculty member. Students completed pre- and post-GOSCE surveys to assess confidence in clinical communication and a GOSCE evaluation to rate the overall experience. Pre- and post-GOSCE program survey scores were compared, and the mean score and standard deviation of the GOSCE evaluation was calculated.
Students perceived improvement in their general (Mean 4.49-4.57, p < .0001), case-specific (3.61-3.84, p < .0001) and group clinical communication (3.75-4.09, p < .0001) skills. Students agreed or strongly agreed that the GOSCE taught them something new (91.20%), made them more comfortable in giving (64.31%) and receiving (66.57%) feedback and working with a group (64.22%). Students found the GOSCE to be as effective as an OSCE (70.97%).
A GOSCE is a valuable resource for use in formative assessment of clinical communication, and it offers the benefit of group collaboration and peer feedback. These findings support the broader use of GOSCEs in undergraduate medical education.
本研究评估了综合临床技能考核(GOSCE)在教授医学生临床沟通、团队合作和同伴反馈方面的效果。
GOSCE 在内科实习期间进行。每组由 4-6 名学生和 1 名教师组成。学生在 GOSCE 前后完成调查,以评估他们在临床沟通方面的信心,并对整体体验进行 GOSCE 评估。比较 GOSCE 前后的方案调查评分,并计算 GOSCE 评估的平均分和标准差。
学生认为他们的一般(平均 4.49-4.57,p<0.0001)、具体病例(3.61-3.84,p<0.0001)和团队临床沟通(3.75-4.09,p<0.0001)技能有所提高。学生们同意或强烈同意 GOSCE 教会了他们一些新的东西(91.20%),使他们在提供(64.31%)和接受(66.57%)反馈以及团队合作(64.22%)方面更加舒适。学生们认为 GOSCE 和客观结构化临床考试(OSCE)一样有效(70.97%)。
GOSCE 是一种评估临床沟通的形成性评价的有价值的资源,它提供了团队合作和同伴反馈的好处。这些发现支持在本科医学教育中更广泛地使用 GOSCE。