Riley Kristen E, Ulrich Michael R, Hamann Heidi A, Ostroff Jamie S
Postdoctoral research fellow at Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center in New York City.
Assistant professor in the Center for Health Law, Ethics & Human Rights and the Department of Health, Law, and Policy Management at Boston University School of Public Health.
AMA J Ethics. 2017 May 1;19(5):475-485. doi: 10.1001/journalofethics.2017.19.5.msoc1-1705.
Public health researchers, mental health clinicians, philosophers, and medical ethicists have questioned whether the public health benefits of large-scale anti-tobacco campaigns are justified in light of the potential for exacerbating stigma toward patients diagnosed with lung cancer. Although there is strong evidence for the public health benefits of anti-tobacco campaigns, there is a growing appreciation for the need to better attend to the unintended consequence of lung cancer stigma. We argue that there is an ethical burden for creators of public health campaigns to consider lung cancer stigma in the development and dissemination of hard-hitting anti-tobacco campaigns. We also contend that health care professionals have an ethical responsibility to try to mitigate stigmatizing messages of public health campaigns with empathic patient-clinician communication during clinical encounters.
公共卫生研究人员、心理健康临床医生、哲学家和医学伦理学家质疑,鉴于大规模反烟草运动可能会加剧对肺癌患者的污名化,其带来的公共卫生益处是否合理。尽管有充分证据表明反烟草运动对公共卫生有益,但人们越来越认识到有必要更好地关注肺癌污名化这一意外后果。我们认为,公共卫生运动的发起者在开展和传播强有力的反烟草运动时,有道德责任考虑肺癌污名化问题。我们还认为,医疗保健专业人员有道德责任在临床诊疗过程中,通过富有同理心的医患沟通,努力减轻公共卫生运动中带有污名化的信息。