Suppr超能文献

左主干/近端左前降支与其他 PCI 之间 DAPT 停药的模式和关联:来自支架患者双联抗血小板治疗不依从模式(PARIS)登记处的结果。

Patterns and associations between DAPT cessation and 2-year clinical outcomes in left main/proximal LAD versus other PCI: Results from the Patterns of Non-Adherence to Dual Antiplatelet Therapy in Stented Patients (PARIS) registry.

机构信息

Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA.

Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA.

出版信息

Int J Cardiol. 2017 Sep 15;243:132-139. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2017.05.049. Epub 2017 May 12.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) of the left main (LM) or proximal left anterior descending artery (pLAD) is considered high-risk as these segments subtend substantial left ventricular myocardial area. We assessed the patterns and associations between dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) cessation and 2-year outcomes in LM/pLAD vs. other PCI from the all-comer PARIS registry.

METHODS

Two-year major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) were a composite of cardiac death, myocardial infarction, definite/probable stent thrombosis or target lesion revascularization. DAPT cessation was predefined as physician-guided permanent discontinuation, temporary interruption, or non-recommended disruption due to non-compliance or bleeding.

RESULTS

Of the study population (n=5018), 25.0% (n=1252) underwent LM/pLAD PCI and 75.0% (n=3766) PCI to other segments. Compared to others, LM/pLAD patients presented with fewer comorbidities, less frequent acute coronary syndromes but more multivessel and bifurcation disease treated with greater stent lengths. Two-year adjusted risk of MACE (11.4% vs. 11.6%; HR 1.10, 95% CI 0.90-1.34, p=0.36) was similar between LM/pLAD vs. other patients. DAPT discontinuation was significantly higher (43.3% vs. 39.4%, p=0.01) in LM/pLAD patients with borderline significance for lower disruption (10.0% vs. 14.7%, p=0.059) compared to other patients. DAPT discontinuation was not associated with higher risk of MACE in LM/pLAD (HR 0.65, 95% CI 0.34-1.25) or other PCI groups (HR 0.67, 95% CI 0.47-0.95).

CONCLUSIONS

LM/pLAD PCI was not an independent predictor of 2-year MACE. Compared to other PCI, patients undergoing LM/pLAD PCI had higher rates of physician recommended DAPT discontinuation, however, discontinuation did not result in greater adverse events.

摘要

目的

经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)的左主干(LM)或近端左前降支(pLAD)被认为是高危的,因为这些节段覆盖了大量的左心室心肌区域。我们评估了来自所有患者 PARIS 注册研究中 LM/pLAD 与其他 PCI 之间双重抗血小板治疗(DAPT)停药与 2 年结局之间的模式和关联。

方法

2 年主要不良心血管事件(MACE)是心脏死亡、心肌梗死、明确/可能的支架血栓形成或靶病变血运重建的综合指标。DAPT 停药被定义为医生指导的永久性停药、临时中断或因不遵医嘱或出血而不建议中断。

结果

在研究人群(n=5018)中,25.0%(n=1252)行 LM/pLAD PCI,75.0%(n=3766)行其他节段 PCI。与其他患者相比,LM/pLAD 患者的合并症较少,急性冠状动脉综合征的发生率较低,但多支血管和分叉病变的发生率较高,支架长度也较大。2 年 MACE 的调整风险(11.4% vs. 11.6%;HR 1.10,95%CI 0.90-1.34,p=0.36)在 LM/pLAD 患者与其他患者之间相似。LM/pLAD 患者 DAPT 停药率显著较高(43.3% vs. 39.4%,p=0.01),与其他患者相比,DAPT 中断率较低(10.0% vs. 14.7%,p=0.059)。在 LM/pLAD 或其他 PCI 组中,DAPT 停药与 MACE 风险增加无关(HR 0.65,95%CI 0.34-1.25;HR 0.67,95%CI 0.47-0.95)。

结论

LM/pLAD PCI 不是 2 年 MACE 的独立预测因素。与其他 PCI 相比,行 LM/pLAD PCI 的患者 DAPT 停药的医生推荐率较高,但停药并未导致更多不良事件。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验