• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

大小重要吗?对大小不同的奖励的赌瘾者皮肤电传导反应的考察。

Does size matter? An examination of problem gamblers' skin conductance responses to large and small magnitude rewards.

机构信息

School of Health, Medical, and Applied Sciences, Central Queensland University, Bundaberg, Queensland, Australia.

School of Psychology, Western Sydney University, Penrith, New South Wales, Australia.

出版信息

Psychophysiology. 2017 Oct;54(10):1541-1548. doi: 10.1111/psyp.12897. Epub 2017 May 27.

DOI:10.1111/psyp.12897
PMID:28555873
Abstract

Previous research has shown that individuals with substance use disorder equally value small and large magnitude rewards. This has led some researchers to conceptualize the problematic behaviors associated with this disorder as being, at least in part, caused by a deficiency in processing reward stimuli. Considering the documented similarities between substance use disorder and disordered gambling, the current study sought to investigate whether problem gamblers also display such an aberrant pattern of incentive processing. Skin conductance responses (SCRs) to small and large magnitude wins were recorded from 16 problem gamblers (PGs) and 16 healthy controls (HCs) while they completed a computer-simulated electronic gaming machine task. The results show that, while large wins elicited greater SCRs compared to small wins for the HC group, no difference in SCR amplitude was found following large and small wins in the PG group. These findings suggest that problem gamblers may be less effective at evaluating the value of incentives, and are discussed in terms of relevant theoretical frameworks.

摘要

先前的研究表明,物质使用障碍患者同样重视小幅度和大幅度的奖励。这导致一些研究人员将与这种障碍相关的问题行为概念化为,至少部分是由于处理奖励刺激的缺陷引起的。考虑到物质使用障碍和赌博障碍之间有记载的相似性,目前的研究旨在调查赌瘾者是否也表现出这种异常的激励处理模式。在 16 名赌瘾者(PGs)和 16 名健康对照组(HCs)完成计算机模拟电子游戏机任务时,记录了他们对小幅度和大幅度赢钱的皮肤电反应(SCR)。结果表明,虽然对于 HC 组来说,大赢钱比小赢钱引起更大的 SCR,但在 PG 组中,大赢钱和小赢钱后的 SCR 幅度没有差异。这些发现表明,赌瘾者可能在评估激励价值方面效率较低,并根据相关理论框架进行了讨论。

相似文献

1
Does size matter? An examination of problem gamblers' skin conductance responses to large and small magnitude rewards.大小重要吗?对大小不同的奖励的赌瘾者皮肤电传导反应的考察。
Psychophysiology. 2017 Oct;54(10):1541-1548. doi: 10.1111/psyp.12897. Epub 2017 May 27.
2
Problem gamblers are hyposensitive to wins: an analysis of skin conductance responses during actual gambling on electronic gaming machines.问题赌徒对赢钱反应迟钝:对在电子游戏机上实际赌博期间皮肤电导率反应的分析。
Psychophysiology. 2014 Jun;51(6):556-64. doi: 10.1111/psyp.12198. Epub 2014 Mar 3.
3
Reward and punishment hyposensitivity in problem gamblers: A study of event-related potentials using a principal components analysis.问题赌徒的奖惩低敏感性:一项使用主成分分析的事件相关电位研究。
Clin Neurophysiol. 2015 Jul;126(7):1295-309. doi: 10.1016/j.clinph.2014.10.011. Epub 2014 Oct 19.
4
Electrodermal activity reliably captures physiological differences between wins and losses during gambling on electronic machines.皮肤电活动可靠地捕捉到在电子机器上赌博时赢和输之间的生理差异。
Psychophysiology. 2012 Feb;49(2):154-63. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8986.2011.01290.x. Epub 2011 Sep 19.
5
Can event-related potentials serve as neural markers for wins, losses, and near-wins in a gambling task? A principal components analysis.在赌博任务中,事件相关电位能否作为赢、输和近赢的神经标志物?一项主成分分析。
Int J Psychophysiol. 2013 Sep;89(3):390-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2013.06.011. Epub 2013 Jun 18.
6
Reinforcing Small Wins and Frustrating Near-Misses: Further Investigation Into Scratch Card Gambling.强化小胜与挫败近成功体验:对刮刮乐赌博的进一步调查
J Gambl Stud. 2017 Mar;33(1):47-63. doi: 10.1007/s10899-016-9611-0.
7
Imbalance in the sensitivity to different types of rewards in pathological gambling.病理性赌博者对不同类型奖励的敏感性失衡。
Brain. 2013 Aug;136(Pt 8):2527-38. doi: 10.1093/brain/awt126. Epub 2013 Jun 11.
8
The frustrating effects of just missing the jackpot: slot machine near-misses trigger large skin conductance responses, but no post-reinforcement pauses.只差一点就中大奖的令人沮丧的影响:老虎机的近奖触发了较大的皮肤电反应,但没有强化后停顿。
J Gambl Stud. 2013 Dec;29(4):661-74. doi: 10.1007/s10899-012-9333-x.
9
Problem gamblers exhibit reward hypersensitivity in medial frontal cortex during gambling.问题赌徒在赌博期间表现出内侧前额叶皮层的奖励过度敏感。
Neuropsychologia. 2011 Nov;49(13):3768-75. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2011.09.037. Epub 2011 Oct 1.
10
Psychophysiological determinants and concomitants of deficient decision making in pathological gamblers.病态赌徒决策缺陷的心理生理决定因素及伴随情况。
Drug Alcohol Depend. 2006 Oct 1;84(3):231-9. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2006.02.007. Epub 2006 Mar 30.

引用本文的文献

1
Interoception Within the Context of Impulsivity and Addiction.冲动与成瘾背景下的内感受作用
Curr Addict Rep. 2023;10(2):97-106. doi: 10.1007/s40429-023-00482-7. Epub 2023 Apr 29.
2
Experiencing a significant win and its sociodemographic and motivational predictors: A comparative analysis of pure-chance gamblers from Poland and France.体验重大胜利及其社会人口学和动机预测因素:来自波兰和法国的纯机会型赌徒的比较分析。
PLoS One. 2022 Nov 21;17(11):e0277972. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0277972. eCollection 2022.
3
Do pupillary responses during authentic slot machine use reflect arousal or screen luminance fluctuations? A proof-of-concept study.
真实老虎机使用过程中的瞳孔反应反映的是兴奋还是屏幕亮度波动?一项概念验证研究。
PLoS One. 2022 Jul 25;17(7):e0272070. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0272070. eCollection 2022.
4
Heart rate variability and interoceptive accuracy predict impaired decision-making in Gambling Disorder.心率变异性和内感受准确性可预测赌博障碍患者的决策受损。
J Behav Addict. 2021 Sep 28;10(3):701-710. doi: 10.1556/2006.2021.00067.