• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

评估新生儿重症监护病房中预防错误患者医嘱的连续策略。

Evaluating Serial Strategies for Preventing Wrong-Patient Orders in the NICU.

机构信息

Departments of Medicine and Biomedical Informatics, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, New York;

Division of Quality and Patient Safety, NewYork-Presbyterian Hospital, New York, New York.

出版信息

Pediatrics. 2017 May;139(5). doi: 10.1542/peds.2016-2863.

DOI:10.1542/peds.2016-2863
PMID:28557730
Abstract

BACKGROUND

NICU patients have characteristics believed to increase their risk for wrong-patient errors; however, little is known about the frequency of wrong-patient errors in the NICU or about effective interventions for preventing these errors. We conducted a quality improvement study to evaluate the frequency of wrong-patient orders in the NICU and to assess the effectiveness of an ID reentry intervention and a distinct naming convention (eg, "Wendysgirl") for reducing these errors, using non-NICU pediatric units as a comparator.

METHODS

Using a validated measure, we examined the rate of wrong-patient orders in NICU and non-NICU pediatric units during 3 periods: baseline (before implementing interventions), ID reentry intervention (reentry of patient identifiers before placing orders), and combined intervention (addition of a distinct naming convention for newborns).

RESULTS

We reviewed >850 000 NICU orders and >3.5 million non-NICU pediatric orders during the 7-year study period. At baseline, wrong-patient orders were more frequent in NICU than in non-NICU pediatric units (117.2 vs 74.9 per 100 000 orders, respectively; odds ratio 1.56; 95% confidence interval, 1.34-1.82). The ID reentry intervention reduced the frequency of errors in the NICU to 60.2 per 100 000 (48.7% reduction; < .001). The combined ID reentry and distinct naming interventions yielded an additional decrease to 45.6 per 100 000 (61.1% reduction from baseline; < .001).

CONCLUSIONS

The risk of wrong-patient orders in the NICU was significantly higher than in non-NICU pediatric units. Implementation of a combined ID reentry intervention and distinct naming convention greatly reduced this risk.

摘要

背景

新生儿重症监护病房(NICU)的患者具有被认为会增加其发生错误患者错误的风险的特征;然而,对于 NICU 中错误患者错误的发生频率或预防这些错误的有效干预措施知之甚少。我们进行了一项质量改进研究,以评估 NICU 中错误患者医嘱的发生频率,并评估重新输入患者 ID 和使用独特命名惯例(例如,“Wendysgirl”)的干预措施的有效性,以降低这些错误,同时将非 NICU 儿科病房作为对照组。

方法

使用经过验证的衡量标准,我们在三个阶段检查了 NICU 和非 NICU 儿科病房中错误患者医嘱的发生率:基线期(在实施干预措施之前)、重新输入患者 ID 干预期(在下达医嘱之前重新输入患者标识符)和联合干预期(为新生儿添加独特命名惯例)。

结果

在 7 年的研究期间,我们审查了超过 850000 份 NICU 医嘱和超过 350 万份非 NICU 儿科医嘱。在基线期,NICU 中错误患者医嘱的发生频率高于非 NICU 儿科病房(分别为每 100000 份医嘱 117.2 份和 74.9 份;优势比 1.56;95%置信区间,1.34-1.82)。重新输入患者 ID 的干预措施将 NICU 中的错误频率降低至每 100000 份 60.2 份(减少 48.7%;<0.001)。联合重新输入患者 ID 和独特命名的干预措施使错误率进一步降低至每 100000 份 45.6 份(与基线相比减少 61.1%;<0.001)。

结论

NICU 中错误患者医嘱的风险明显高于非 NICU 儿科病房。实施联合重新输入患者 ID 干预措施和独特命名惯例大大降低了这种风险。

相似文献

1
Evaluating Serial Strategies for Preventing Wrong-Patient Orders in the NICU.评估新生儿重症监护病房中预防错误患者医嘱的连续策略。
Pediatrics. 2017 May;139(5). doi: 10.1542/peds.2016-2863.
2
Risk of Wrong-Patient Orders Among Multiple vs Singleton Births in the Neonatal Intensive Care Units of 2 Integrated Health Care Systems.两个综合医疗系统的新生儿重症监护病房中多胞胎与单胞胎出生时错患医嘱的风险。
JAMA Pediatr. 2019 Oct 1;173(10):979-985. doi: 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2019.2733.
3
Use of Temporary Names for Newborns and Associated Risks.临时命名新生儿及其相关风险。
Pediatrics. 2015 Aug;136(2):327-33. doi: 10.1542/peds.2015-0007. Epub 2015 Jul 13.
4
Understanding and preventing wrong-patient electronic orders: a randomized controlled trial.理解和预防电子医嘱错误:一项随机对照试验。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2013 Mar-Apr;20(2):305-10. doi: 10.1136/amiajnl-2012-001055. Epub 2012 Jun 29.
5
Effect of an Alternative Newborn Naming Strategy on Wrong-Patient Errors: A Quasi-Experimental Study.替代新生儿命名策略对患者错误的影响:一项准实验研究。
Appl Clin Inform. 2020 Mar;11(2):235-241. doi: 10.1055/s-0040-1705175. Epub 2020 Apr 1.
6
A Quality Improvement Project to Decrease Human Milk Errors in the NICU.一项旨在减少新生儿重症监护病房人乳错误的质量改进项目。
Pediatrics. 2017 Feb;139(2). doi: 10.1542/peds.2015-4451. Epub 2017 Jan 11.
7
Assessing medication prescribing errors in pediatric intensive care units.评估儿科重症监护病房的用药处方错误。
Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2004 Mar;5(2):124-32. doi: 10.1097/01.PCC.0000112371.26138.E8.
8
Effect of computer order entry on prevention of serious medication errors in hospitalized children.计算机医嘱录入对预防住院儿童严重用药错误的影响。
Pediatrics. 2008 Mar;121(3):e421-7. doi: 10.1542/peds.2007-0220.
9
Preventing adverse events in the pediatric intensive care unit: prospectively targeting factors that lead to intravenous potassium chloride order errors.预防儿科重症监护病房中的不良事件:前瞻性地针对导致静脉注射氯化钾医嘱错误的因素。
Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2005 Jan;6(1):25-32. doi: 10.1097/01.PCC.0000149832.76329.90.
10
Reducing prescribing errors in the paediatric intensive care unit: an experience from Egypt.减少儿科重症监护病房的处方错误:来自埃及的经验。
Acta Paediatr. 2011 Oct;100(10):e169-74. doi: 10.1111/j.1651-2227.2011.02270.x. Epub 2011 May 5.

引用本文的文献

1
Secure Messaging Use and Wrong-Patient Ordering Errors Among Inpatient Clinicians.住院临床医生的安全消息使用情况与错误患者医嘱错误
JAMA Netw Open. 2024 Dec 2;7(12):e2447797. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.47797.
2
Association of patient photographs and reduced retract-and-reorder events.患者照片与减少的牵拉和重新排序事件的关联。
JAMIA Open. 2024 Jul 2;7(3):ooae042. doi: 10.1093/jamiaopen/ooae042. eCollection 2024 Oct.
3
Retrospective cohort study of wrong-patient imaging order errors: how many reach the patient?回顾性队列研究错误患者影像学检查医嘱错误:有多少医嘱到达患者?
BMJ Qual Saf. 2024 Jan 19;33(2):132-135. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2023-016162.
4
Automated search methods for identifying wrong patient order entry-a scoping review.用于识别错误患者医嘱录入的自动化搜索方法——一项综述
JAMIA Open. 2023 Aug 2;6(3):ooad057. doi: 10.1093/jamiaopen/ooad057. eCollection 2023 Oct.
5
Using electronic health record audit log data for research: insights from early efforts.利用电子健康记录审核日志数据进行研究:早期努力的见解。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2022 Dec 13;30(1):167-171. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocac173.
6
Patterns of Safety Incidents in a Neonatal Intensive Care Unit.新生儿重症监护病房安全事件模式
Front Pediatr. 2021 Jun 10;9:664524. doi: 10.3389/fped.2021.664524. eCollection 2021.
7
Incident Reports of Naming Errors among Two Sets of Infant Twins.两组婴儿双胞胎命名错误事件报告。
Pediatr Qual Saf. 2020 Oct 23;5(6):e356. doi: 10.1097/pq9.0000000000000356. eCollection 2020 Nov-Dec.
8
Association of Display of Patient Photographs in the Electronic Health Record With Wrong-Patient Order Entry Errors.电子健康记录中显示患者照片与错误患者医嘱录入错误的关联。
JAMA Netw Open. 2020 Nov 2;3(11):e2019652. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.19652.
9
Effect of an Alternative Newborn Naming Strategy on Wrong-Patient Errors: A Quasi-Experimental Study.替代新生儿命名策略对患者错误的影响:一项准实验研究。
Appl Clin Inform. 2020 Mar;11(2):235-241. doi: 10.1055/s-0040-1705175. Epub 2020 Apr 1.
10
Effect of Restriction of the Number of Concurrently Open Records in an Electronic Health Record on Wrong-Patient Order Errors: A Randomized Clinical Trial.电子病历中同时打开记录数量限制对错误患者医嘱错误的影响:一项随机临床试验。
JAMA. 2019 May 14;321(18):1780-1787. doi: 10.1001/jama.2019.3698.