• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

两组婴儿双胞胎命名错误事件报告。

Incident Reports of Naming Errors among Two Sets of Infant Twins.

作者信息

Redman Chelsea T, Reddy Pooja, Kneifati-Hayek Jerard Z, Applebaum Jo R, Manzano Wilhelmina, Goffman Dena, Adelman Jason S

机构信息

Division of General Medicine, Department of Medicine, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, N.Y.

Division of Pediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition, Department of Pediatrics, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, N.Y.

出版信息

Pediatr Qual Saf. 2020 Oct 23;5(6):e356. doi: 10.1097/pq9.0000000000000356. eCollection 2020 Nov-Dec.

DOI:10.1097/pq9.0000000000000356
PMID:33575520
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7870170/
Abstract

UNLABELLED

Newborns are at high risk for identification errors due to their inability to speak and indistinguishable features. To reduce this risk, The Joint Commission requires hospitals to use a distinct identification method for newborns. Most hospitals create medical records for newborns at birth using temporary naming conventions, resulting in patients with similar identifiers. Typically, multiple-birth infants are distinguished from their siblings by a single character (1, 2, or A, B), placing them at higher risk for identification errors, which can delay care and compromise patient safety.

METHODS

We present 2 unrelated cases involving naming errors in sets of infant twins receiving care in a healthcare system using Joint Commission compliant distinct temporary naming convention.

RESULTS

In the 2 cases, system failures contributed to naming errors in 2 sets of infant twins, which resulted in delayed care. In the first case, twins were inadvertently assigned the same temporary name. In the second case, an infant's blood specimen label did not include a single character, which distinguishes a multiple-birth infant from their sibling. Further safeguards are needed to reduce this risk. These cases illustrated the potential for misidentification related to newborn naming conventions during the registration process, especially between siblings of multiple-birth infants.

CONCLUSIONS

Further research is needed to determine strategies to prevent newborn identification errors. Potential strategies to reduce this risk and protect newborns include improving the design of newborn identifiers, systems-level interventions such as verification alerts, and improved registration processes.

摘要

未标注

由于新生儿无法说话且特征难以区分,他们面临着较高的身份识别错误风险。为降低这种风险,联合委员会要求医院对新生儿采用独特的身份识别方法。大多数医院在新生儿出生时使用临时命名惯例创建医疗记录,导致患者标识符相似。通常,多胞胎婴儿通过单个字符(1、2或A、B)与他们的兄弟姐妹区分开来,这使他们面临更高的身份识别错误风险,可能会延误治疗并危及患者安全。

方法

我们介绍了2例不相关的病例,涉及在一个使用符合联合委员会标准的独特临时命名惯例的医疗系统中接受治疗的双胞胎婴儿组中的命名错误。

结果

在这2例病例中,系统故障导致2组双胞胎婴儿出现命名错误,从而导致治疗延误。在第一例中,双胞胎被无意中赋予了相同的临时名字。在第二例中,一名婴儿的血液标本标签没有包含用于区分多胞胎婴儿与其兄弟姐妹的单个字符。需要进一步的保障措施来降低这种风险。这些病例说明了在登记过程中与新生儿命名惯例相关的身份误认可能性,尤其是在多胞胎婴儿的兄弟姐妹之间。

结论

需要进一步研究以确定预防新生儿身份识别错误的策略。降低这种风险并保护新生儿的潜在策略包括改进新生儿标识符的设计、系统层面的干预措施(如验证警报)以及改进登记流程。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1073/7870170/197225758a33/pqs-5-e356-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1073/7870170/197225758a33/pqs-5-e356-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1073/7870170/197225758a33/pqs-5-e356-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Incident Reports of Naming Errors among Two Sets of Infant Twins.两组婴儿双胞胎命名错误事件报告。
Pediatr Qual Saf. 2020 Oct 23;5(6):e356. doi: 10.1097/pq9.0000000000000356. eCollection 2020 Nov-Dec.
2
Risk of Wrong-Patient Orders Among Multiple vs Singleton Births in the Neonatal Intensive Care Units of 2 Integrated Health Care Systems.两个综合医疗系统的新生儿重症监护病房中多胞胎与单胞胎出生时错患医嘱的风险。
JAMA Pediatr. 2019 Oct 1;173(10):979-985. doi: 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2019.2733.
3
Use of Temporary Names for Newborns and Associated Risks.临时命名新生儿及其相关风险。
Pediatrics. 2015 Aug;136(2):327-33. doi: 10.1542/peds.2015-0007. Epub 2015 Jul 13.
4
Effect of an Alternative Newborn Naming Strategy on Wrong-Patient Errors: A Quasi-Experimental Study.替代新生儿命名策略对患者错误的影响:一项准实验研究。
Appl Clin Inform. 2020 Mar;11(2):235-241. doi: 10.1055/s-0040-1705175. Epub 2020 Apr 1.
5
Assisted Reproductive Technology Surveillance - 
United States, 2013.辅助生殖技术监测报告——美国,2013 年。
MMWR Surveill Summ. 2015 Dec 4;64(11):1-25. doi: 10.15585/mmwr.ss6411a1.
6
Evaluating Serial Strategies for Preventing Wrong-Patient Orders in the NICU.评估新生儿重症监护病房中预防错误患者医嘱的连续策略。
Pediatrics. 2017 May;139(5). doi: 10.1542/peds.2016-2863.
7
Estimated number of siblings in Japanese families with multiple birth children using two sets of census data: 1990 and 1995.利用1990年和1995年两组人口普查数据估算的日本多胞胎家庭中的兄弟姐妹数量
Twin Res Hum Genet. 2011 Apr;14(2):179-84. doi: 10.1375/twin.14.2.179.
8
Babyboy/Babygirl: A National Survey on the Use of Temporary, Nondistinct Naming Conventions for Newborns in Neonatal Intensive Care Units.男婴/女婴:关于新生儿重症监护病房中对新生儿使用临时、无明显区别的命名惯例的全国性调查。
Clin Pediatr (Phila). 2017 Oct;56(12):1157-1159. doi: 10.1177/0009922817701178. Epub 2017 Apr 12.
9
The Short-Run and Long-Run Effects of Birth Weight: Evidence from Large Samples of Siblings and Twins in Taiwan.
Health Econ. 2017 Jul;26(7):910-921. doi: 10.1002/hec.3367. Epub 2016 Jul 20.
10
Assisted reproductive technology surveillance--United States, 2011.辅助生殖技术监测——美国,2011 年。
MMWR Surveill Summ. 2014 Nov 21;63(10):1-28.

引用本文的文献

1
Acceptability of pictographs as a novel patient identifier to improve patient safety in the neonatal intensive care unit.象形图作为一种新型患者标识符在新生儿重症监护病房中提高患者安全的可接受性。
AMIA Annu Symp Proc. 2025 May 22;2024:980-986. eCollection 2024.

本文引用的文献

1
A National Survey on the Use of Temporary Naming Conventions for Newborns: 5-Year Follow-up.一项关于新生儿临时命名惯例使用情况的全国性调查:5年随访
Clin Pediatr (Phila). 2020 Sep;59(9-10):925-928. doi: 10.1177/0009922820922534. Epub 2020 May 19.
2
Risk of Wrong-Patient Orders Among Multiple vs Singleton Births in the Neonatal Intensive Care Units of 2 Integrated Health Care Systems.两个综合医疗系统的新生儿重症监护病房中多胞胎与单胞胎出生时错患医嘱的风险。
JAMA Pediatr. 2019 Oct 1;173(10):979-985. doi: 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2019.2733.
3
Evaluating Serial Strategies for Preventing Wrong-Patient Orders in the NICU.
评估新生儿重症监护病房中预防错误患者医嘱的连续策略。
Pediatrics. 2017 May;139(5). doi: 10.1542/peds.2016-2863.
4
Babyboy/Babygirl: A National Survey on the Use of Temporary, Nondistinct Naming Conventions for Newborns in Neonatal Intensive Care Units.男婴/女婴:关于新生儿重症监护病房中对新生儿使用临时、无明显区别的命名惯例的全国性调查。
Clin Pediatr (Phila). 2017 Oct;56(12):1157-1159. doi: 10.1177/0009922817701178. Epub 2017 Apr 12.
5
Use of Temporary Names for Newborns and Associated Risks.临时命名新生儿及其相关风险。
Pediatrics. 2015 Aug;136(2):327-33. doi: 10.1542/peds.2015-0007. Epub 2015 Jul 13.
6
Attitudes and barriers to incident reporting: a collaborative hospital study.事件报告的态度与障碍:一项医院合作研究。
Qual Saf Health Care. 2006 Feb;15(1):39-43. doi: 10.1136/qshc.2004.012559.
7
Patient misidentification in the neonatal intensive care unit: quantification of risk.新生儿重症监护病房中的患者身份误认:风险量化
Pediatrics. 2006 Jan;117(1):e43-7. doi: 10.1542/peds.2005-0291.