• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

颈动脉狭窄支架置入术成本驱动因素的调查。

Investigation into drivers of cost of stenting for carotid stenosis.

作者信息

Rinaldo Lorenzo, Brinjikji Waleed, Cloft Harry, DeMartino Randall R, Lanzino Giuseppe

机构信息

Department of Neurosurgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minn.

Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minn.

出版信息

J Vasc Surg. 2017 Sep;66(3):786-793. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2017.03.433. Epub 2017 May 27.

DOI:10.1016/j.jvs.2017.03.433
PMID:28559178
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

We aimed to identify factors associated with cost of carotid artery stenting (CAS).

METHODS

Patient and hospital characteristics affecting cost of admission for CAS were identified using the Vizient national database of hospital-reported outcomes. Patients who underwent CAS for either asymptomatic or symptomatic carotid stenosis were identified using surgical Medicare Severity-Diagnosis Related Groups and appropriate International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision and Tenth Revision codes.

RESULTS

There were 166 hospitals that reported outcomes from 7369 inpatient admissions for CAS. Each institution reported a mean value for cost related to patient care per admission for CAS; the average cost across all reporting institutions was $12,834.14 (standard error of the mean [SEM], 492.88). Institutions in the lowest 25th percentile with respect to frequency of intensive care unit admission after CAS had lower cost of admission than institutions above the 75th percentile ($10,971.30 [SEM, 460.67] vs $14,992.90 [964.29]; P = .002), without any differences in incidence of stroke during admission (2.2% [SEM, 0.3] vs 2.0% [0.4]; P = .877) or 30-day readmission (1.9% [SEM, 0.4] vs 2.5 [0.6]; P = .329). Admissions for patients with symptomatic stenosis were more expensive than those with asymptomatic stenosis ($20,462.10 [SEM, 819.93] vs $11,285.20 [347.11]; P < .001). Obesity was also associated with greater costs of admission ($14,176.20 [SEM, 597.13] vs $12,287.10 [395.73]; P < .001).

CONCLUSIONS

Admission to an intensive care unit, symptomatic stenosis, and obesity were associated with increased costs in patients undergoing CAS. These data may aid in identifying opportunities to improve the cost-effectiveness of this procedure.

摘要

目的

我们旨在确定与颈动脉支架置入术(CAS)费用相关的因素。

方法

利用Vizient全国医院报告结局数据库,确定影响CAS住院费用的患者和医院特征。使用手术医疗保险严重程度诊断相关组以及适当的国际疾病分类第九版和第十版编码,识别因无症状或有症状颈动脉狭窄而接受CAS的患者。

结果

有166家医院报告了7369例CAS住院患者的结局。每家机构报告了每次CAS住院患者护理相关费用的平均值;所有报告机构的平均费用为12,834.14美元(均值标准误[SEM],492.88)。CAS后重症监护病房入住频率处于最低第25百分位的机构,其住院费用低于第75百分位以上的机构(10,971.30美元[SEM,460.67]对14,992.90美元[964.29];P = .002),住院期间中风发生率(2.2%[SEM,0.3]对2.0%[0.4];P = .877)或30天再入院率(1.9%[SEM,0.4]对2.5[0.6];P = .329)无差异。有症状狭窄患者的住院费用高于无症状狭窄患者(20,462.10美元[SEM,819.93]对11,285.20美元[347.11];P < .001)。肥胖也与更高的住院费用相关(14,176.20美元[SEM,597.13]对12,287.10美元[395.73];P < .001)。

结论

入住重症监护病房、有症状狭窄和肥胖与接受CAS的患者费用增加相关。这些数据可能有助于确定提高该手术成本效益的机会。

相似文献

1
Investigation into drivers of cost of stenting for carotid stenosis.颈动脉狭窄支架置入术成本驱动因素的调查。
J Vasc Surg. 2017 Sep;66(3):786-793. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2017.03.433. Epub 2017 May 27.
2
Fixed and variable cost of carotid endarterectomy and stenting in the United States: A comparative study.美国颈动脉内膜切除术和支架置入术的固定成本与可变成本:一项比较研究。
J Vasc Surg. 2017 May;65(5):1398-1406.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2016.11.062. Epub 2017 Feb 16.
3
Predictors of poor outcome after carotid intervention.颈动脉介入术后不良预后的预测因素。
J Vasc Surg. 2016 Sep;64(3):663-70. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2016.03.428. Epub 2016 May 18.
4
Experience matters more than specialty for carotid stenting outcomes.对于颈动脉支架置入术的预后,经验比专业特长更重要。
J Vasc Surg. 2015 Apr;61(4):933-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2014.11.066. Epub 2015 Jan 16.
5
Carotid endarterectomy is more cost-effective than carotid artery stenting.颈动脉内膜切除术比颈动脉支架置入术更具成本效益。
J Vasc Surg. 2012 Jun;55(6):1623-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2011.12.045. Epub 2012 Mar 28.
6
Impact of chronic kidney disease in patients undergoing percutaneous or surgical carotid artery revascularization: Insights of the healthcare cost and utilization Project's National Inpatient Sample.慢性肾脏病对接受经皮或外科颈动脉血运重建术患者的影响:医疗成本与利用项目国家住院患者样本的见解
Cardiovasc Revasc Med. 2016 Dec;17(8):560-565. doi: 10.1016/j.carrev.2016.08.014. Epub 2016 Sep 7.
7
Should Medicare reimbursement for carotid artery stenting be extended to standard and low risk symptomatic and asymptomatic patients with carotid stenosis?医疗保险对颈动脉支架置入术的报销范围应扩大到患有颈动脉狭窄的标准风险和低风险有症状及无症状患者吗?
Vascular. 2012 Feb;20(1):7-11. doi: 10.1258/vasc.2011.201103. Epub 2012 Jan 25.
8
Costs and cost-effectiveness of carotid stenting versus endarterectomy for patients at increased surgical risk: results from the SAPPHIRE trial.增加手术风险患者颈动脉支架置入术与内膜切除术的成本和成本效益:来自 SAPPHIRE 试验的结果。
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2011 Mar 1;77(4):463-72. doi: 10.1002/ccd.22869.
9
Carotid artery stenting: Impact of practitioner specialty and volume on outcomes and resource utilization.颈动脉支架置入术:从业者专业领域和手术量对治疗结果及资源利用的影响。
J Vasc Surg. 2009 May;49(5):1166-71. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2008.12.006.
10
Carotid Endarterectomy versus Carotid Artery Stenting: No Difference in 30-Day Postprocedure Readmission Rates.颈动脉内膜切除术与颈动脉支架置入术:术后30天再入院率无差异。
Ann Vasc Surg. 2015 Oct;29(7):1408-15. doi: 10.1016/j.avsg.2015.05.013. Epub 2015 Jul 11.

引用本文的文献

1
Inpatient Costs of Treating Patients With COVID-19.治疗 COVID-19 患者的住院费用。
JAMA Netw Open. 2024 Jan 2;7(1):e2350145. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.50145.