FACTORS DETERMINING A CLUTCH SIZE REDUCTION IN CALIFORNIA GULLS (LARUS CALIFORNICUS): A MULTI-HYPOTHESIS APPROACH.

In the thirty-five years since David Lack first highlighted the importance of clutch size, a large number of hypotheses have been proposed relating clutch size variation to various environmental and demographic factors. Despite a great deal of both empirical and theoretical work on clutch size, there has been very little effort to test many of the competing hypotheses in explaining a clutch size difference between two populations of the same species. I have taken the latter approach in an effort to explain a clutch size reduction in the California Gull (Larus californicus) population at Mono Lake, California. I compared the breeding biologies of the gulls at Mono Lake and at Great Salt Lake, Utah, collecting data for three breeding seasons at Mono Lake and one breeding season at Great Salt Lake. These data included measurements of the conditions of 60 adults, growth and mortality measurements for approximately 900 chicks, 4450 nest-hours of parental care observations, and the results of egg-removal experiments on 40 females. I tested seven hypotheses to explain the clutch size reduction: age structure, egg predation, bet-hedging, effort reallocation, most productive brood size, parental mortality, and pre-egg food limitation. Each of these hypotheses is described in detail in the introduction. The pre-egg food limitation hypothesis is best able to explain the clutch size reduction at Mono Lake, although the egg-removal experiments show that the resource limitation is relative and not absolute. Clutch size variation at each site need not be viewed as the result of fine-scaled evolutionary adjustment, although the general clutch size decision machinery is presumably molded by selection. Future research must focus on the details of this clutch size decision machinery and its application to the concept of reproductive effort.