From the Department of Radiology (Y.S.H., C.J.L., H.M.W., W.Y.G., C.B.L., C.C.W.) and Neurologic Institute, Department of Neurosurgery (W.Y.C., K.D.L., H.C.Y., C.C.L.), Taipei Veterans General Hospital, 201 Shipai Rd, Sec 2, Beitou District, Taipei 112, Taiwan (ROC); and School of Medicine, National Yang Ming University, Taipei, Taiwan (ROC) (Y.S.H., C.J.L., H.M.W., W.Y.G., C.B.L., C.C.W., W.Y.C., K.D.L., H.C.Y., C.C.L.).
Radiology. 2017 Nov;285(2):528-535. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2017162594. Epub 2017 May 30.
Purpose To investigate whether sinovenous outflow restriction (SOR) is more strongly associated with hemorrhage than cortical venous reflux (CVR) in patients with lateral sinus dural arteriovenous fistulas (DAVFs). Materials and Methods An institutional review board approved this retrospective study and waiver of informed consent was obtained. From 1995 to 2016, 163 cases of lateral sinus DAVFs were included and divided into hemorrhagic and nonhemorrhagic groups based on initial presentation. Their angiograms and magnetic resonance images were evaluated, with two evaluators independently grading CVR and SOR. The SOR was scored as the combined conduit score (CCS), ranging from zero (total occlusion) to 8 (fully patent). The CVR and CCS of the hemorrhagic and nonhemorrhagic groups were compared. Logistic regression models were established for both the CVR and CCS to compare their performances in discriminating DAVF hemorrhage. Results Sinovenous outflow was significantly more restrictive (lower median CCS) in the hemorrhagic group than in the nonhemorrhagic group (1 vs 6.5; P < .001). A CCS of less than or equal to 2 best discriminated between the groups with a sensitivity of 90.0% and a specificity of 88.1%. The CCS model had a higher discriminative performance than did the CVR model (area under the curve, 0.933 vs 0.843; P = .018). Conclusion The CCS grading system semiquantifies SOR. SOR may represent a stronger risk factor associated with hemorrhage in patients with lateral sinus DAVFs than does CVR, and thus may offer guidance in therapeutic decision making. RSNA, 2017.
目的 探讨在外侧窦硬脑膜动静脉瘘(DAVF)患者中,静脉窦流出受限(SOR)与皮质静脉反流(CVR)相比,与出血的相关性是否更强。
材料与方法 本研究经机构审查委员会批准,且豁免了知情同意。1995 年至 2016 年,共纳入 163 例外侧窦 DAVF 患者,根据首发表现分为出血组和非出血组。评估其血管造影和磁共振图像,由 2 名评估者独立对 CVR 和 SOR 进行分级。SOR 评分采用联合导管评分(CCS),范围从 0(完全闭塞)到 8(完全通畅)。比较出血组和非出血组的 CVR 和 CCS。建立 CVR 和 CCS 的逻辑回归模型,比较其在区分 DAVF 出血方面的性能。
结果 出血组的静脉窦流出明显受限(CCS 中位数较低),低于非出血组(1 比 6.5;P<0.001)。CCS 小于或等于 2 可最佳区分两组,具有 90.0%的敏感性和 88.1%的特异性。CCS 模型的判别性能优于 CVR 模型(曲线下面积,0.933 比 0.843;P=0.018)。
结论 CCS 分级系统半定量评估 SOR。SOR 可能是外侧窦 DAVF 患者出血的一个比 CVR 更强的相关危险因素,因此可能为治疗决策提供指导。