Huang Lei, Ge Liang, Lu Gang, Geng Daoying, Zhang Xiaolong, Cao Wenjie
Department of Radiology, Huashan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Department of Radiology, Huashan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
World Neurosurg. 2017 Nov;107:130-136. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2017.07.142. Epub 2017 Aug 2.
The association between venous reflux patterns with aggressive intracranial lesions (AILs), including intracranial edema (IE), intraparenphymal hemorrhage (IPH), and subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH), has not been well established in cranial dural arteriovenous fistulas (DAVFs). We propose an updated classification system based on venous drainage.
We retrospectively assessed the catheter angiography findings of venous drainage patterns. Cranial DAVFs with no reflux flow and those with reflux flow drainage into the sinus only, the bridge vein only, the bridge vein and pial vein, and the sinus, bridge vein, and pial vein were designated as types 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5, respectively. We analyzed the associations between venous reflux patterns with AILs in 73 patients with DAVFs.
AILs were found in 43 patients (58.9%), including 8 (11%) with SAH, 8 (11%) with IPH, and 27 (36.9%) with IE. Our proposed classification scheme was significantly associated with AILs (P < 0.001). SAH was found in patients with type 3 (62.5%) and type 4 (37.5%), whereas IPH was seen mostly in those with type 4 (87.5%). The proportion of IE gradually increased from type 3 to type 5 (11.1% to 29.6% to 59.2%). Significant difference was found among each type between complete resolution and uncompleted resolution after endovascular treatment (P = 0.034), which also demonstrated a gradually increasing proportion of uncompleted resolution from type 1 to type 5 (4.5%, 4.5%, 9.1%, 31.8%, and 50%).
Our proposed classification system effectively demonstrates a correlation between venous reflux patterns and AILs and outcomes of endovascular treatment in patients with DAVFs.
在硬脑膜动静脉瘘(DAVF)中,静脉反流模式与侵袭性颅内病变(AIL)之间的关联尚未完全明确,AIL包括颅内水肿(IE)、脑实质内出血(IPH)和蛛网膜下腔出血(SAH)。我们提出了一种基于静脉引流的更新分类系统。
我们回顾性评估了静脉引流模式的导管血管造影结果。无反流以及仅向窦、仅向桥静脉、向桥静脉和软脑膜静脉、向窦、桥静脉和软脑膜静脉反流引流的颅DAVF分别被指定为1型、2型、3型、4型和5型。我们分析了73例DAVF患者静脉反流模式与AIL之间的关联。
43例患者(58.9%)发现AIL,其中8例(11%)为SAH,8例(11%)为IPH,27例(36.9%)为IE。我们提出的分类方案与AIL显著相关(P<0.001)。SAH见于3型(62.5%)和4型(37.5%)患者,而IPH多见于4型(87.5%)患者。IE的比例从3型到5型逐渐增加(11.1%至29.6%至59.2%)。血管内治疗后完全缓解与未完全缓解在各类型之间存在显著差异(P = 0.034),这也表明从1型到5型未完全缓解的比例逐渐增加(4.5%、4.5%、9.1%、31.8%和50%)。
我们提出的分类系统有效地证明了DAVF患者静脉反流模式与AIL以及血管内治疗结果之间的相关性。