Suppr超能文献

通过斯卡查德图和克洛茨图确定的受体位点数量:互补方法

Number of receptor sites from Scatchard and Klotz graphs: complementary approaches.

作者信息

Faguet G B

机构信息

Department of Medicine, Medical College of Georgia, Augusta.

出版信息

J Cell Biochem. 1986;31(3):243-50. doi: 10.1002/jcb.240310306.

Abstract

Estimates of number of receptor sites and evaluation of the complexity of the binding process require collection of a spectrum of binding measurements and selection of a theoretical model to fit the experimental data. The appropriateness of the measurements and of the model can be visually judged on graphic displays of the model-data fitting curves in Scatchard and semilogarithmic coordinates. This approach is helpful for detecting the two types of errors most frequently found in reports of binding studies: (1) underestimating the number of binding sites, and (2) failure to recognize the complexity of the binding process. While the former is readily recognizable on semilogarithmic but not on Scatchard plots of the model fitting the data, the latter might not be apparent on either plot. Collection of extensive measurements over a wide range of ligand concentrations with graphic display of the model-data fitting curves in Scatchard and semilogarithmic coordinates should be used to recognize and prevent both errors.

摘要

受体位点数量的估计以及结合过程复杂性的评估需要收集一系列结合测量数据,并选择一个理论模型来拟合实验数据。测量数据和模型的适用性可以通过在Scatchard和半对数坐标中模型-数据拟合曲线的图形显示进行直观判断。这种方法有助于检测结合研究报告中最常见的两种错误:(1)低估结合位点的数量,以及(2)未能认识到结合过程的复杂性。虽然前者在拟合数据的模型的半对数图上很容易识别,但在Scatchard图上则不然,而后者在两种图上可能都不明显。应收集广泛的配体浓度范围内的大量测量数据,并在Scatchard和半对数坐标中以图形方式显示模型-数据拟合曲线,以识别和防止这两种错误。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验