• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

同塑性水平的变化模式。

PATTERNS OF VARIATION IN LEVELS OF HOMOPLASY.

作者信息

Sanderson Michael J, Donoghue Michael J

机构信息

Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, 85721.

出版信息

Evolution. 1989 Dec;43(8):1781-1795. doi: 10.1111/j.1558-5646.1989.tb02626.x.

DOI:10.1111/j.1558-5646.1989.tb02626.x
PMID:28564338
Abstract

Patterns of variation in levels of homoplasy were explored through statistical analyses of standardized consistency indexes. Data were obtained from 60 recent cladistic analyses of a wide variety of organisms based on several different kinds of characters. Consistency index is highly correlated with the number of taxa included in an analysis, with homoplasy increasing as the number of taxa increases. This observation is compatible with a simple model of character evolution in which 1) the probability of character-state change increases with the total number of branches in a tree and 2) the number of possible states of a character is limited. Consistency index does not show a significant relationship to the number of characters utilized in an analysis or to the taxonomic rank of the terminal taxa. When the relationship between consistency index and number of taxa is taken into account, there is no significant difference between plant and animal data sets in the amount of homoplasy. Likewise, the level of homoplasy in morphological and molecular data sets does not appear to differ significantly, although there are still too few molecular studies to be confident of this result. Future comparisons of consistency indexes, including studies along the lines established here, must take into account the influence of the number of taxa on homoplasy.

摘要

通过对标准化一致性指数的统计分析,探究了同塑性水平的变化模式。数据取自基于几种不同特征对多种生物进行的60项近期分支系统学分析。一致性指数与分析中包含的分类单元数量高度相关,随着分类单元数量的增加,同塑性也会增加。这一观察结果与一个简单的性状进化模型相符,在该模型中:1)性状状态变化的概率随着树中分支总数的增加而增加;2)性状的可能状态数量是有限的。一致性指数与分析中使用的性状数量或终端分类单元的分类等级没有显著关系。当考虑一致性指数与分类单元数量之间的关系时,植物和动物数据集在同塑性程度上没有显著差异。同样,形态学和分子数据集的同塑性水平似乎也没有显著差异,尽管分子研究仍然太少,无法确定这一结果。未来对一致性指数的比较,包括按照此处确立的思路进行的研究,必须考虑分类单元数量对同塑性的影响。

相似文献

1
PATTERNS OF VARIATION IN LEVELS OF HOMOPLASY.同塑性水平的变化模式。
Evolution. 1989 Dec;43(8):1781-1795. doi: 10.1111/j.1558-5646.1989.tb02626.x.
2
The size of the character state space affects the occurrence and detection of homoplasy: modelling the probability of incompatibility for unordered phylogenetic characters.字符状态空间的大小会影响同塑性的出现和检测:对无序系统发育特征不相容性的概率进行建模。
J Theor Biol. 2015 Feb 7;366:24-32. doi: 10.1016/j.jtbi.2014.10.033. Epub 2014 Nov 6.
3
IN SEARCH OF HOMOPLASTIC TENDENCIES: STATISTICAL INFERENCE OF TOPOLOGICAL PATTERNS IN HOMOPLASY.寻找同塑性倾向:同塑性中拓扑模式的统计推断
Evolution. 1991 Mar;45(2):351-358. doi: 10.1111/j.1558-5646.1991.tb04409.x.
4
The morphological state space revisited: what do phylogenetic patterns in homoplasy tell us about the number of possible character states?重新审视形态学状态空间:同塑性中的系统发育模式能告诉我们关于可能的性状状态数量的哪些信息?
Interface Focus. 2015 Dec 6;5(6):20150049. doi: 10.1098/rsfs.2015.0049.
5
THE USEFULNESS OF BEHAVIOR FOR PHYLOGENY ESTIMATION: LEVELS OF HOMOPLASY IN BEHAVIORAL AND MORPHOLOGICAL CHARACTERS.行为在系统发育估计中的作用:行为和形态特征中的同塑性水平
Evolution. 1993 Feb;47(1):46-60. doi: 10.1111/j.1558-5646.1993.tb01198.x.
6
MACROEVOLUTIONARY PATTERNS OF MORPHOLOGICAL DIVERSIFICATION AMONG PARASITIC FLATWORMS (PLATYHELMINTHES: CERCOMERIA).寄生扁虫(扁形动物门:尾感器纲)形态多样化的宏观进化模式
Evolution. 1993 Apr;47(2):495-509. doi: 10.1111/j.1558-5646.1993.tb02109.x.
7
Taking phylogenetics beyond pattern analysis: can models of genome dynamics guide predictions about homoplasy in morphological and behavioral data sets?超越模式分析的系统发育学:基因组动力学模型能否指导对形态学和行为数据集的平行演化进行预测?
J Hum Evol. 2007 May;52(5):522-35. doi: 10.1016/j.jhevol.2006.11.015. Epub 2007 Feb 20.
8
Exhaustion of morphologic character states among fossil taxa.化石分类群中形态特征状态的耗尽。
Evolution. 2000 Apr;54(2):365-86. doi: 10.1111/j.0014-3820.2000.tb00040.x.
9
Homoplasy as an Auxiliary Criterion for Species Delimitation.同塑性作为物种界定的辅助标准
Microorganisms. 2021 Jan 28;9(2):273. doi: 10.3390/microorganisms9020273.
10
Proportional Change and Patterns of Homoplasy: Sanderson and Donoghue Revisited.
Cladistics. 1997 Mar;13(1-2):97-100. doi: 10.1111/j.1096-0031.1997.tb00243.x.

引用本文的文献

1
Evolution of fungal phenotypic disparity.真菌表型差异的进化。
Nat Ecol Evol. 2022 Oct;6(10):1489-1500. doi: 10.1038/s41559-022-01844-6. Epub 2022 Aug 15.
2
Molecular phylogenies map to biogeography better than morphological ones.分子系统发育比形态学更能反映生物地理学。
Commun Biol. 2022 May 31;5(1):521. doi: 10.1038/s42003-022-03482-x.
3
Signatures of selection in core and accessory genomes indicate different ecological drivers of diversification among Bacillus cereus clades.核心基因组和辅助基因组中的选择特征表明,蜡样芽胞杆菌菌群的多样化存在不同的生态驱动因素。
Mol Ecol. 2022 Jul;31(13):3584-3597. doi: 10.1111/mec.16490. Epub 2022 May 17.
4
Comparative Mitogenomic Analysis of Two Longhorn Beetles (Coleoptera: Cerambycidae: Lamiinae) with Preliminary Investigation into Phylogenetic Relationships of Tribes of Lamiinae.两种天牛(鞘翅目:天牛科:沟胫天牛亚科)的线粒体基因组比较分析及沟胫天牛亚科族间系统发育关系的初步研究
Insects. 2021 Sep 12;12(9):820. doi: 10.3390/insects12090820.
5
Homoplasy as an Auxiliary Criterion for Species Delimitation.同塑性作为物种界定的辅助标准
Microorganisms. 2021 Jan 28;9(2):273. doi: 10.3390/microorganisms9020273.
6
Well-Annotated microRNAomes Do Not Evidence Pervasive miRNA Loss.精心注释的 microRNAomes 并未表明 miRNA 普遍丢失。
Genome Biol Evol. 2018 Jun 1;10(6):1457-1470. doi: 10.1093/gbe/evy096.
7
Species diversity driven by morphological and ecological disparity: a case study of comparative seed morphology and anatomy across a large monocot order.由形态和生态差异驱动的物种多样性:以一个大型单子叶植物目种子形态与解剖结构的比较研究为例
AoB Plants. 2016 Oct 27;8. doi: 10.1093/aobpla/plw063. Print 2016.
8
Bayesian methods outperform parsimony but at the expense of precision in the estimation of phylogeny from discrete morphological data.贝叶斯方法比简约法表现更优,但代价是从离散形态数据估计系统发育时精度有所损失。
Biol Lett. 2016 Apr;12(4). doi: 10.1098/rsbl.2016.0081.
9
Why should we investigate the morphological disparity of plant clades?我们为什么要研究植物类群的形态差异?
Ann Bot. 2016 Apr;117(5):859-79. doi: 10.1093/aob/mcv135. Epub 2015 Dec 9.
10
The morphological state space revisited: what do phylogenetic patterns in homoplasy tell us about the number of possible character states?重新审视形态学状态空间:同塑性中的系统发育模式能告诉我们关于可能的性状状态数量的哪些信息?
Interface Focus. 2015 Dec 6;5(6):20150049. doi: 10.1098/rsfs.2015.0049.