Roff Derek A, Mousseau Timothy A, Howard Daniel J
Department of Biology, McGill University, 1205 Dr. Penfield Avenue, Montreal, Quebec, H3A 1B1, Canada.
Department of Biological Sciences, University of South Carolina, Columbia, South Carolina, 29208.
Evolution. 1999 Feb;53(1):216-224. doi: 10.1111/j.1558-5646.1999.tb05347.x.
Predictions using quantitative genetic models generally assume that the variance-covariance matrices remain constant over time. This assumption is based on the supposition that selection is generally weak and hence variation lost through selection can be replaced by new mutations. Whether this is generally true can only be ascertained from empirical studies. Ideally for such a study we should be able to make a prediction concerning the relative strength of selection versus genetic drift. If the latter force is prevalent then the variance-covariances matrices should be proportional to each other. Previous studies have indicated that females in the two sibling cricket species Allonemobius socius and A. fasciatus do not discriminate between males of the two species by their calling song. Therefore, differences between the calling song of the two males most likely result from drift rather than sexual selection. We test this hypothesis by comparing the genetic architecture of calling song of three populations of A. fasciatus with two populations of A. socius. We found no differences among populations within species, but significant differences in the G (genetic) and P (phenotypic) matrices between species, with the matrices being proportional as predicted under the hypothesis of genetic drift. Because of the proportional change in the (co)variances no differences between species are evident in the heritabilities or genetic correlations. Comparison of the two species with a hybrid population from a zone of overlap showed highly significant nonproportional variation in genetic architecture. This variation is consistent with a general mixture of two separate genomes or selection. Qualitative conclusions reached using the phenotypic matrices are the same as those reached using the genetic matrices supporting the hypothesis that the former may be used as surrogate measures of the latter.
使用定量遗传模型进行预测通常假定方差协方差矩阵随时间保持不变。这一假设基于这样的推测:选择作用一般较弱,因此因选择而丧失的变异可由新的突变来替代。这一推测是否普遍成立只能通过实证研究来确定。理想情况下,对于这样一项研究,我们应该能够对选择与遗传漂变的相对强度做出预测。如果后一种力量占主导,那么方差协方差矩阵应该相互成比例。先前的研究表明,在两种亲缘关系相近的蟋蟀物种,即社会异针蟋(Allonemobius socius)和条纹异针蟋(A. fasciatus)中,雌性不会根据求偶鸣叫来区分这两个物种的雄性。因此,这两种雄性求偶鸣叫的差异很可能是由遗传漂变而非性选择导致的。我们通过比较条纹异针蟋三个种群与社会异针蟋两个种群的求偶鸣叫遗传结构来检验这一假设。我们发现同一物种内的不同种群之间没有差异,但不同物种之间的G(遗传)矩阵和P(表型)矩阵存在显著差异,且这些矩阵正如在遗传漂变假设下所预测的那样成比例。由于(协)方差的成比例变化,不同物种在遗传力或遗传相关性上没有明显差异。将这两个物种与来自重叠区域的一个杂交种群进行比较,结果显示遗传结构存在高度显著的非比例变化。这种变化与两个独立基因组的一般混合或选择相一致。使用表型矩阵得出的定性结论与使用遗传矩阵得出的结论相同,这支持了前者可作为后者替代指标的假设。