• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

自然种群中突变、选择与生活史变异的维持

MUTATION, SELECTION, AND THE MAINTENANCE OF LIFE-HISTORY VARIATION IN A NATURAL POPULATION.

作者信息

Lynch Michael, Latta Leigh, Hicks Justin, Giorgianni Matthew

机构信息

Department of Biology, University of Oregon, Eugene, Oregon, 97403.

出版信息

Evolution. 1998 Jun;52(3):727-733. doi: 10.1111/j.1558-5646.1998.tb03697.x.

DOI:10.1111/j.1558-5646.1998.tb03697.x
PMID:28565240
Abstract

In an effort to provide insight into the role of mutation in the maintenance of genetic variance for life-history traits, we accumulated spontaneous mutations in 10 sets of clonal replicates of Daphnia pulex for approximately 30 generations and compared the variance generated by mutation with the standing level of variation in the wild population. Mutations for quantitative traits appear to arise at a fairly high rate in this species, on the order of at least 0.6 per character per generation, but have relatively small heterozygous effects, changing the phenotype by less than 2.5% of the mean. The mean persistence time of a new mutation affecting life-history/body-size traits is approximately 40 generations in the natural population, which requires an average selection coefficient against new mutations of approximately 3% in the heterozygous state. These data are consistent with the idea that the vast majority of standing genetic variance for life-history characters may be largely a consequence of the recurrent introduction of transient cohorts of mutations that are at least conditionally deleterious and raise issues about the meaning of conventional measures of standing levels of variation for fitness-related traits.

摘要

为了深入了解突变在维持生活史性状遗传变异中的作用,我们在大约30代的时间里,在10组大型溞克隆复制品中积累自发突变,并将突变产生的变异与野生种群中现有的变异水平进行比较。在这个物种中,数量性状的突变似乎以相当高的速率出现,每代每个性状至少0.6个,但其杂合效应相对较小,使表型变化小于平均值的2.5%。影响生活史/体型性状的新突变在自然种群中的平均持续时间约为40代,这需要对杂合状态下的新突变有大约3%的平均选择系数。这些数据与以下观点一致:生活史性状的绝大多数现有遗传变异可能在很大程度上是反复引入至少有条件有害的短暂突变群体的结果,这引发了关于适应性相关性状现有变异水平传统测量方法意义的问题。

相似文献

1
MUTATION, SELECTION, AND THE MAINTENANCE OF LIFE-HISTORY VARIATION IN A NATURAL POPULATION.自然种群中突变、选择与生活史变异的维持
Evolution. 1998 Jun;52(3):727-733. doi: 10.1111/j.1558-5646.1998.tb03697.x.
2
THE QUANTITATIVE AND MOLECULAR GENETIC ARCHITECTURE OF A SUBDIVIDED SPECIES.一个细分物种的数量与分子遗传结构
Evolution. 1999 Feb;53(1):100-110. doi: 10.1111/j.1558-5646.1999.tb05336.x.
3
Effects of short-term spontaneous mutation accumulation for life history traits in grape phylloxera, Daktulosphaira vitifoliae.葡萄根瘤蚜(Daktulosphaira vitifoliae)生活史性状短期自发突变积累的影响
Genetica. 2003 Nov;119(3):237-51. doi: 10.1023/b:gene.0000003610.73205.c7.
4
Spontaneous Mutation Accumulation in Daphnia pulex in Selection-Free vs. Competitive Environments.无选择压力与竞争环境下的大型溞(Daphnia pulex)自发突变积累。
Mol Biol Evol. 2017 Jan;34(1):160-173. doi: 10.1093/molbev/msw234. Epub 2016 Oct 24.
5
Comparing mutational variabilities.比较突变变异性。
Genetics. 1996 Jul;143(3):1467-83. doi: 10.1093/genetics/143.3.1467.
6
Fitness effects of spontaneous mutations in a warming world.在全球变暖的情况下,自发突变的适应效应。
Evolution. 2021 Jun;75(6):1513-1524. doi: 10.1111/evo.14208. Epub 2021 Mar 24.
7
Regeneration of the variance of metric traits by spontaneous mutation in a Drosophila population.
Genet Res (Camb). 2010 Apr;92(2):91-102. doi: 10.1017/S001667231000011X.
8
The phenotypic effects of spontaneous mutations in different environments.不同环境中自发突变的表型效应。
Am Nat. 2015 Feb;185(2):243-52. doi: 10.1086/679501.
9
A POPULATION GENETIC THEORY OF CANALIZATION.一种关于发育稳定性的群体遗传理论。
Evolution. 1997 Apr;51(2):329-347. doi: 10.1111/j.1558-5646.1997.tb02420.x.
10
An estimate of fitness reduction from mutation accumulation in a mammal allows assessment of the consequences of relaxed selection.估算哺乳动物因突变积累而导致的适应度降低,可以评估选择放松带来的后果。
PLoS Biol. 2024 Sep 26;22(9):e3002795. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.3002795. eCollection 2024 Sep.

引用本文的文献

1
Patterns of Genetic and Clonal Diversity in in Streams and Reservoirs of Republic of Korea.韩国溪流和水库中的遗传与克隆多样性模式
Plants (Basel). 2025 Aug 26;14(17):2648. doi: 10.3390/plants14172648.
2
Evolutionary Insights from a Large-Scale Survey of Population-Genomic Variation.大规模群体基因组变异研究的进化见解。
Mol Biol Evol. 2023 Nov 3;40(11). doi: 10.1093/molbev/msad233.
3
Evolutionary Insights from a Large-scale Survey of Population-genomic Variation.来自大规模群体基因组变异调查的进化见解。
bioRxiv. 2023 May 3:2023.05.03.539276. doi: 10.1101/2023.05.03.539276.
4
Are mutations usually deleterious? A perspective on the fitness effects of mutation accumulation.突变通常是有害的吗?关于突变积累适应性效应的观点。
Evol Ecol. 2022 Oct;36(5):753-766. doi: 10.1007/s10682-022-10187-4. Epub 2022 Jun 21.
5
Maintenance of quantitative genetic variance in complex, multitrait phenotypes: the contribution of rare, large effect variants in 2 Drosophila species.在复杂的多性状表型中维持数量遗传方差:2 种果蝇中稀有、大效应变异的贡献。
Genetics. 2022 Sep 30;222(2). doi: 10.1093/genetics/iyac122.
6
Fitness effects of spontaneous mutations in a warming world.在全球变暖的情况下,自发突变的适应效应。
Evolution. 2021 Jun;75(6):1513-1524. doi: 10.1111/evo.14208. Epub 2021 Mar 24.
7
with a Tunable Point Mutation Rate for Evolution Experiments.具有可调节突变率的进化实验。
G3 (Bethesda). 2020 Aug 5;10(8):2671-2681. doi: 10.1534/g3.120.401124.
8
Quantification of the Underlying Mechanisms and Relationships Among Cancer, Metastasis, and Differentiation and Development.癌症、转移、分化与发育之间潜在机制及关系的量化
Front Genet. 2020 Mar 2;10:1388. doi: 10.3389/fgene.2019.01388. eCollection 2019.
9
Sexually antagonistic selection promotes genetic divergence between males and females in an ant.性拮抗选择促进了蚂蚁中雌雄个体间的遗传分化。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2019 Nov 26;116(48):24157-24163. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1906568116. Epub 2019 Nov 12.
10
Juvenile social experience generates differences in behavioral variation but not averages.青少年的社会经历会导致行为变化上的差异,而非平均水平的差异。
Behav Ecol. 2019 Mar-Apr;30(2):455-464. doi: 10.1093/beheco/ary185. Epub 2018 Dec 21.