• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

雌蛛的性大小二态性与生殖投入:一项比较分析

SEXUAL SIZE DIMORPHISM AND REPRODUCTIVE INVESTMENT BY FEMALE SPIDERS: A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS.

作者信息

Prenter John, Elwood Robert W, Montgomery W Ian

机构信息

School of Biology and Biochemistry, The Queen's University of Belfast, Medical Biology Centre, 97 Lisburn Road, Belfast, BT9 7BL, Northern Ireland.

出版信息

Evolution. 1999 Dec;53(6):1987-1994. doi: 10.1111/j.1558-5646.1999.tb04580.x.

DOI:10.1111/j.1558-5646.1999.tb04580.x
PMID:28565440
Abstract

We investigate the association between female reproductive investment, absolute size, and sexual size dimorphism in spiders to test the predictions of the fecundity-advantage hypothesis. The relationships between absolute size and sexual size dimorphism and aspects of female reproductive output are examined in comparative analyses using phylogenetically independent contrasts. We provide support for the idea that allometry for sexual dimorphism is the result of variation in female size more so than male size. Regression analyses suggest selection for increased fecundity in females. We argue that fecundity selection provides the only general explanation for the evolution of sexual size dimorphism in spiders.

摘要

我们研究蜘蛛的雌性生殖投资、绝对体型和两性体型差异之间的关联,以检验繁殖力优势假说的预测。在使用系统发育独立对比的比较分析中,研究了绝对体型与两性体型差异以及雌性生殖产出各方面之间的关系。我们支持这样一种观点,即两性体型差异的异速生长更多是由雌性体型的变化而非雄性体型的变化导致的。回归分析表明存在对雌性繁殖力增加的选择。我们认为,繁殖力选择为蜘蛛两性体型差异的进化提供了唯一普遍的解释。

相似文献

1
SEXUAL SIZE DIMORPHISM AND REPRODUCTIVE INVESTMENT BY FEMALE SPIDERS: A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS.雌蛛的性大小二态性与生殖投入:一项比较分析
Evolution. 1999 Dec;53(6):1987-1994. doi: 10.1111/j.1558-5646.1999.tb04580.x.
2
Phylogeny suggests nondirectional and isometric evolution of sexual size dimorphism in argiopine spiders.系统发育学表明,银斑蛛科蜘蛛的两性异形呈现非定向且等比的进化。
Evolution. 2014 Oct;68(10):2861-72. doi: 10.1111/evo.12504. Epub 2014 Sep 17.
3
Geographic variation of life-history traits in the sand lizard, Lacerta agilis: testing Darwin's fecundity-advantage hypothesis.沙蜥(捷蜥蜴,Lacerta agilis)生活史特征的地理变异:对达尔文繁殖力优势假说的检验
J Evol Biol. 2015 Mar;28(3):613-29. doi: 10.1111/jeb.12594. Epub 2015 Feb 12.
4
The evolution of fecundity is associated with female body size but not female-biased sexual size dimorphism among frogs.在青蛙中,繁殖力的进化与雌性体型有关,但与雌性偏向的两性体型差异无关。
J Evol Biol. 2015 Oct;28(10):1793-803. doi: 10.1111/jeb.12695. Epub 2015 Aug 21.
5
Have male and female genitalia coevolved? A phylogenetic analysis of genitalic morphology and sexual size dimorphism in web-building spiders (Araneae: Araneoidea).雄性和雌性生殖器是协同进化的吗?对结网蜘蛛(蜘蛛目:园蛛总科)生殖器形态和两性异形的系统发育分析。
Evolution. 2005 Sep;59(9):1989-99. doi: 10.1554/04-499.1.
6
A comparative test of adaptive hypotheses for sexual size dimorphism in lizards.蜥蜴两性异形适应性假说的比较试验
Evolution. 2003 Jul;57(7):1653-69. doi: 10.1111/j.0014-3820.2003.tb00371.x.
7
Sexual Size Dimorphism: Evolution and Perils of Extreme Phenotypes in Spiders.性二型现象:蜘蛛极端表型的进化与风险。
Annu Rev Entomol. 2020 Jan 7;65:57-80. doi: 10.1146/annurev-ento-011019-025032. Epub 2019 Oct 1.
8
THE EVOLUTION OF FEMALE-BIASED SEXUAL SIZE DIMORPHISM: A POPULATION-LEVEL COMPARATIVE STUDY IN HORNED LIZARDS (PHRYNOSOMA).雌性偏向的两性异形的演化:角蜥(角蜥属)的种群水平比较研究
Evolution. 1998 Dec;52(6):1821-1833. doi: 10.1111/j.1558-5646.1998.tb02259.x.
9
Sexual size dimorphism in lizards: Rensch's rule, reproductive mode, clutch size, and line fitting method effects.蜥蜴中的性二型现象:伦施法则、生殖模式、产卵数、以及线性拟合方法的影响。
Integr Zool. 2022 Sep;17(5):787-803. doi: 10.1111/1749-4877.12569. Epub 2021 Jul 28.
10
Sexual size dimorphism in caecilian amphibians: analysis, review and directions for future research.蚓螈两栖动物的两性体型差异:分析、综述与未来研究方向
Zoology (Jena). 2009;112(5):362-9. doi: 10.1016/j.zool.2008.12.001. Epub 2009 May 9.

引用本文的文献

1
Exploring shape diversity and sexual dimorphism in two populations of Nigma conducens through geometric morphometrics.通过几何形态测量学探索两个Nigma conducens种群的形状多样性和两性异形。
BMC Zool. 2025 Feb 8;10(1):4. doi: 10.1186/s40850-025-00224-4.
2
Sexual size dimorphism affecting mate choice and reproduction in the pine sawyer beetle, Monochamus alternatus.性二型影响松墨天牛 Monochamus alternatus 的配偶选择和繁殖。
Oecologia. 2024 Dec;206(3-4):347-358. doi: 10.1007/s00442-024-05635-7. Epub 2024 Nov 10.
3
Foraging strategy as a route for sexual size dimorphism evolution.
觅食策略作为性大小二态性进化的一条途径。
Ecol Evol. 2024 Nov 7;14(11):e70100. doi: 10.1002/ece3.70100. eCollection 2024 Nov.
4
Still little evidence sex differences in spatial navigation are evolutionary adaptations.目前仍缺乏证据表明空间导航中的性别差异是进化适应的结果。
R Soc Open Sci. 2024 Jan 17;11(1):231532. doi: 10.1098/rsos.231532. eCollection 2024 Jan.
5
Sex-specific life-history strategies among immature jumping spiders: Differences in body parameters and behavior.未成熟跳蛛的性别特异性生活史策略:身体参数和行为的差异。
Curr Zool. 2022 Sep 6;69(5):535-551. doi: 10.1093/cz/zoac069. eCollection 2023 Oct.
6
Diversification through gustatory courtship: an X-ray micro-computed tomography study on dwarf spiders.通过味觉求偶实现多样化:一项关于矮蛛的X射线显微计算机断层扫描研究
Front Zool. 2021 Sep 28;18(1):51. doi: 10.1186/s12983-021-00435-8.
7
Body Size, Not Personality, Explains Both Male Mating Success and Sexual Cannibalism in a Widow Spider.在一种寡妇蜘蛛中,体型而非个性决定了雄性的交配成功率和性食同类现象。
Biology (Basel). 2021 Mar 3;10(3):189. doi: 10.3390/biology10030189.
8
Sexual dimorphism in the Arachnid orders.蛛形纲目动物的两性异形。
PeerJ. 2018 Nov 6;6:e5751. doi: 10.7717/peerj.5751. eCollection 2018.
9
Field evidence challenges the often-presumed relationship between early male maturation and female-biased sexual size dimorphism.实地证据对早期雄性成熟与雌性偏向的两性体型差异之间通常假定的关系提出了挑战。
Ecol Evol. 2017 Oct 16;7(22):9592-9601. doi: 10.1002/ece3.3450. eCollection 2017 Nov.
10
Selection for predation, not female fecundity, explains sexual size dimorphism in the orchid mantises.选择导致了捕食,而不是雌性繁殖力,解释了兰花螳螂的性二型现象。
Sci Rep. 2016 Dec 1;6:37753. doi: 10.1038/srep37753.