Voelker Gary
Burke Museum and Department of Zoology, University of Washington, Box 353010, Seattle, Washington, 98195.
Evolution. 1999 Oct;53(5):1536-1552. doi: 10.1111/j.1558-5646.1999.tb05417.x.
Dispersal and vicariant hypotheses have for decades been at odds with each other, notwithstanding the fact that both are well-established natural processes with important histories in biogeographic analyses. Despite their importance, neither dispersal nor vicariant methodologies are problem-free. The now widely used molecular techniques for generating phylogenies have provided a mechanism by which both dispersal- and vicariance-driven speciation can be better tested via the application of molecular clocks; unfortunately, substantial problems can also exist in the employment of those clocks. To begin to assess the relative roles of dispersal and vicariance in the establishment of avifaunas, especially intercontinental avifaunas, I applied a test for clocklike behavior in molecular data, as well as a program that infers ancestral areas and dispersal events, to a phylogeny of a speciose, cosmopolitan avian genus (Anthus; Motacillidae). Daughter-lineages above just 25 of 40 nodes in the Anthus phylogeny are evolving in a clocklike manner and are thus dateable by a molecular clock. Dating the applicable nodes suggests that Anthus arose nearly 7 million yr ago, probably in eastern Asia, and that between 6 and 5 million yr ago, Anthus species were present in Africa, the Palearctic, and North and South America. Speciation rates have been high throughout the Pliocene and quite low during the Pleistocene; further evidence that the Pleistocene may have had little effect in generating modern species. Intercontinental movements since 5 million yr ago have been few and largely restricted to interchange between Eurasia and Africa. Species swarms on North America, Africa, and Eurasia (but not South America or Australia) are the product of multiple invasions, rather than being solely the result of within-continent speciation. Dispersal has clearly played an important role in the distribution of this group.
几十年来,扩散假说和替代假说一直相互矛盾,尽管这两者都是在生物地理学分析中有着重要历史的成熟自然过程。尽管它们很重要,但扩散方法和替代方法都并非没有问题。如今广泛用于构建系统发育树的分子技术提供了一种机制,通过应用分子钟,可以更好地检验由扩散和替代驱动的物种形成;不幸的是,在使用这些分子钟时也可能存在重大问题。为了开始评估扩散和替代在鸟类区系建立中的相对作用,特别是洲际鸟类区系的建立,我对一个种类繁多、分布广泛的鸟类属(鹨属;鹡鸰科)的系统发育进行了分子数据的似钟行为测试,以及一个推断祖先区域和扩散事件的程序。在鹨属系统发育树的40个节点中,只有25个以上的子谱系以类似钟的方式进化,因此可以用分子钟来确定时间。对适用节点进行定年表明,鹨属大约在700万年前出现,可能在东亚,在600万至500万年前,鹨属物种出现在非洲、古北区以及北美洲和南美洲。在上新世,物种形成速率一直很高,而在更新世则相当低;这进一步证明更新世可能对现代物种的产生影响很小。自500万年前以来,洲际间的迁移很少,并且主要局限于欧亚大陆和非洲之间的交流。北美洲、非洲和欧亚大陆(但不包括南美洲或澳大利亚)的物种群是多次入侵的产物,而不仅仅是大陆内部物种形成的结果。扩散显然在这个类群的分布中起到了重要作用。