Rocha Amanda V, Rivera Luis O, Martinez Jaime, Prestes Nêmora P, Caparroz Renato
Laboratório de Genética e Biodiversidade, Instituto de Ciências Biológicas, Universidade de Brasília, Brasília, Distrito Federal, Brazil.
Centro de Investigación y Transferencia de Jujuy, Universidad Nacional Jujuy - CONICET, Jujuy, Argentina.
PLoS One. 2014 Sep 24;9(9):e108096. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0108096. eCollection 2014.
Coalescent theory provides powerful models for population genetic inference and is now increasingly important in estimates of divergence times and speciation research. We use molecular data and methods based on coalescent theory to investigate whether genetic evidence supports the hypothesis of A. pretrei and A. tucumana as separate species and whether genetic data allow us to assess which allopatric model seems to better explain the diversification process in these taxa. We sampled 13 A. tucumana from two provinces in northern Argentina and 28 A. pretrei from nine localities of Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil. A 491 bp segment of the mitochondrial gene cytochrome c oxidase I was evaluated using the haplotype network and phylogenetic methods. The divergence time and other demographic quantities were estimated using the isolation and migration model based on coalescent theory. The network and phylogenetic reconstructions showed similar results, supporting reciprocal monophyly for these two taxa. The divergence time of lineage separation was estimated to be approximately 1.3 million years ago, which corresponds to the lower Pleistocene. Our results enforce the current taxonomic status for these two Amazon species. They also support that A. pretrei and A. tucumana diverged with little or no gene flow approximately 1.3 million years ago, most likely after the establishment of a small population in the Southern Yungas forest by dispersion of a few founders from the A. pretrei ancestral population. This process may have been favored by habitat corridors formed in hot and humid periods of the Quaternary. Considering that these two species are considered threatened, the results were evaluated for their implications for the conservation of these two species.
溯祖理论为群体遗传学推断提供了强大的模型,如今在分歧时间估计和物种形成研究中变得越来越重要。我们使用基于溯祖理论的分子数据和方法来研究遗传证据是否支持将普氏按蚊和图库曼按蚊视为不同物种的假设,以及遗传数据是否能让我们评估哪种异域模型似乎能更好地解释这些分类单元的多样化过程。我们从阿根廷北部的两个省份采集了13只图库曼按蚊样本,从巴西南里奥格兰德州的九个地点采集了28只普氏按蚊样本。使用单倍型网络和系统发育方法评估了线粒体基因细胞色素c氧化酶I的491 bp片段。基于溯祖理论,使用隔离和迁移模型估计了分歧时间和其他群体数量。网络和系统发育重建显示了相似的结果,支持这两个分类单元的相互单系性。谱系分离的分歧时间估计约为130万年前,这对应于更新世晚期。我们的结果强化了这两个亚马逊物种目前的分类地位。它们还支持普氏按蚊和图库曼按蚊在大约130万年前分歧时几乎没有或没有基因流动,最有可能是在普氏按蚊祖先群体中的少数奠基者扩散到南永加斯森林中建立了一个小群体之后。这一过程可能受到了第四纪湿热时期形成的栖息地走廊的促进。考虑到这两个物种被认为受到威胁,对结果进行了评估,以探讨其对这两个物种保护的意义。