Suppr超能文献

用于评估多发性硬化症患者有氧能力的工具的质量。

Quality of the tools used to assess aerobic capacity in people with multiple sclerosis.

机构信息

Neuro-Musculo-Skeletal Lab (NMSK), Université Catholique de Louvain, Institut de Recherche Experimentale et Clinique (IREC), Brussels, Belgium.

Service of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Cliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc, Brussels, Belgium.

出版信息

Eur J Phys Rehabil Med. 2017 Oct;53(5):759-774. doi: 10.23736/S1973-9087.17.04218-6. Epub 2017 May 31.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Assessments of physical fitness, including exercise tolerance functions, are valuable in persons with multiple sclerosis (MS). Many tools with widely varying advantages and disadvantages have been used to assess physical fitness in research and clinical practice. To date, there are no recommendations regarding the best tools to use for this purpose in persons with MS. This study aims to systematically review the psychometric properties of the tools used to assess exercise tolerance functions in persons with MS, and to propose recommendations regarding the best test to use.

EVIDENCE ACQUISITION

The literature was searched (PubMed, SPORTdiscus, PEDro, MEDLINE, Embase via Scopus, CINAHL, and PsycInfo) to identify the tools most frequently used to assess exercise tolerance functions. These tools were systematically analyzed.

EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS

Forty-eight articles were selected. Six tools or categories of tools concerning exercise tolerance functions were identified. Whole-body exercise tests combined with gas exchange analysis had the best psychometric properties (e.g., validity, reliability) for assessing aerobic capacity in pwMS with mild to moderate disability (Expanded Disability Status Scale [EDSS] ≤6.5). Although sometimes used for this purpose, walk tests seemed to assess walking performance rather than exercise tolerance functions. The psychometric properties of other tests had scarcely been studied.

CONCLUSIONS

The tools vary widely in quality. Whole-body exercise testing combined with gas exchange analysis has the best psychometric properties of the reviewed tools. If gas exchange analysis is feasible, whole-body exercise tests combined with gas exchange analysis, with maximal exercise effort for pwMS with EDSS ≤4 and submaximal exercise effort for pwMS with EDSS ≥4.5, should be recommended to assess exercise tolerance, both in research and in clinical practice. A selection algorithm is proposed.

摘要

简介

评估身体机能,包括运动耐量功能,在多发性硬化症(MS)患者中具有重要价值。许多具有广泛优缺点的工具已被用于研究和临床实践中评估身体机能。迄今为止,尚无关于在 MS 患者中用于此目的的最佳工具的建议。本研究旨在系统地回顾用于评估 MS 患者运动耐量功能的工具的心理测量特性,并提出关于最佳测试的建议。

证据获取

对文献进行了检索(PubMed、SPORTdiscus、PEDro、MEDLINE、Embase 通过 Scopus、CINAHL 和 PsycInfo),以确定最常用于评估运动耐量功能的工具。这些工具进行了系统分析。

证据综合

共选择了 48 篇文章。确定了 6 种或 6 类工具,涉及运动耐量功能。全身运动测试结合气体交换分析对评估轻度至中度残疾(扩展残疾状态量表 [EDSS] ≤6.5)的 pwMS 的有氧能力具有最佳的心理测量特性。尽管有时用于此目的,但步行测试似乎评估的是步行能力,而不是运动耐量功能。其他测试的心理测量特性几乎没有被研究过。

结论

工具的质量差异很大。全身运动测试结合气体交换分析是已审查工具中具有最佳心理测量特性的工具。如果气体交换分析是可行的,对于 EDSS ≤4 的 pwMS,应建议使用全身运动测试结合气体交换分析进行最大运动努力,对于 EDSS ≥4.5 的 pwMS,应建议使用亚最大运动努力来评估运动耐量,这既适用于研究也适用于临床实践。提出了一种选择算法。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验