Andela Cornelie D, Repping-Wuts Han, Stikkelbroeck Nike M M L, Pronk Mathilde C, Tiemensma Jitske, Hermus Ad R, Kaptein Adrian A, Pereira Alberto M, Kamminga Noelle G A, Biermasz Nienke R
Division of EndocrinologyDepartment of Medicine, and Centre for Endocrine Tumors (CETL), Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Division of EndocrinologyDepartment of Internal Medicine, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Eur J Endocrinol. 2017 Jul;177(1):59-72. doi: 10.1530/EJE-16-1015.
Patients with pituitary disease report impairments in Quality of Life (QoL) despite optimal biomedical care. Until now, the effects of a self-management intervention (SMI) addressing psychological and social issues for these patients and their partners have not been studied.
To examine the effects of a SMI i.e. Patient and Partner Education Programme for Pituitary disease (PPEP-Pituitary).
A multicentre randomized controlled trial included 174 patients with pituitary disease, and 63 partners were allocated to either PPEP-Pituitary or a control group. PPEP-Pituitary included eight weekly sessions (90 min). Self-efficacy, bother and needs for support, illness perceptions, coping and QoL were assessed before the intervention (T0), directly after (T1) and after six months (T2). Mood was assessed before and after each session.
Patients in PPEP-Pituitary reported improved mood after each session (except for session 1). In partners, mood only improved after the last three sessions. Patients reported higher self-efficacy at T1 ( = 0.016) which persisted up to T2 ( = 0.033), and less bother by mood problems directly after PPEP-Pituitary ( = 0.01), but more bother after six months ( = 0.001), although this increase was not different from baseline ( = 0.346). Partners in PPEP-Pituitary reported more vitality ( = 0.008) which persisted up to T2 ( = 0.034). At T2, partners also reported less anxiety and depressive symptoms ( ≤ 0.014).
This first study evaluating the effects of a SMI targeting psychosocial issues in patients with pituitary disease and their partners demonstrated promising positive results. Future research should focus on the refinement and implementation of this SMI into clinical practice.
尽管接受了最佳的生物医学治疗,但垂体疾病患者仍报告生活质量(QoL)受损。到目前为止,尚未研究针对这些患者及其伴侣的心理和社会问题的自我管理干预(SMI)的效果。
研究一种自我管理干预措施,即垂体疾病患者及伴侣教育计划(PPEP-垂体)的效果。
一项多中心随机对照试验纳入了174例垂体疾病患者,63名伴侣被分配到PPEP-垂体组或对照组。PPEP-垂体组包括每周一次的八节课程(90分钟)。在干预前(T0)、干预后立即(T1)和六个月后(T2)评估自我效能感、困扰程度和支持需求、疾病认知、应对方式和生活质量。在每次课程前后评估情绪。
PPEP-垂体组的患者在每次课程后(第1节除外)报告情绪有所改善。在伴侣中,情绪仅在最后三节课程后有所改善。患者在T1时报告自我效能感更高(P = 0.016),这种情况持续到T2(P = 0.033),并且在PPEP-垂体干预后立即情绪问题困扰较少(P = 0.01),但六个月后困扰更多(P = 0.001),尽管这种增加与基线无差异(P = 0.346)。PPEP-垂体组的伴侣报告更有活力(P = 0.008),这种情况持续到T2(P = 0.034)。在T2时,伴侣还报告焦虑和抑郁症状较少(P≤0.014)。
这项首次评估针对垂体疾病患者及其伴侣心理社会问题的自我管理干预效果的研究显示出有希望的积极结果。未来的研究应侧重于将这种自我管理干预措施完善并应用于临床实践。