Suppr超能文献

林氏分类描述了贲门失弛缓症的内镜进展过程,而成功的经口内镜下肌切开术可防止贲门失弛缓症的内镜进展。

Ling classification describes endoscopic progressive process of achalasia and successful peroral endoscopy myotomy prevents endoscopic progression of achalasia.

作者信息

Zhang Wen-Gang, Linghu En-Qiang, Chai Ning-Li, Li Hui-Kai

机构信息

Wen-Gang Zhang, En-Qiang Linghu, Ning-Li Chai, Hui-Kai Li, Department of Gastroenterology, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing 100853, China.

出版信息

World J Gastroenterol. 2017 May 14;23(18):3309-3314. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v23.i18.3309.

Abstract

AIM

To verify the hypothesis that the Ling classification describes the endoscopic progressive process of achalasia and determine the ability of successful peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) to prevent endoscopic progression of achalasia.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed the endoscopic findings, symptom duration, and manometric data in patients with achalasia. A total of 359 patients (197 women, 162 men) with a mean age of 42.1 years (range, 12-75 years) were evaluated. Symptom duration ranged from 2 to 360 mo, with a median of 36 mo. Patients were classified with Ling type I ( = 119), IIa ( = 106), IIb ( = 60), IIc ( = 60), or III ( = 14), according to the Ling classification. Of the 359 patients, 349 underwent POEM, among whom 21 had an endoscopic follow-up for more than 2 years. Pre-treatment and post-treatment Ling classifications of these 21 patients were compared.

RESULTS

Symptom duration increased significantly with increasing Ling classification (from I to III) ( < 0.05), whereas lower esophageal sphincter pressure decreased with increasing Ling type (from I to III) ( < 0.05). There was no difference in sex ratio or onset age among the Ling types, although the age at time of diagnosis was higher in Ling types IIc and III than in Ling types I, IIa, and IIb. Of the 21 patients, 19 underwent high-resolution manometry both before and after treatment. The mean preoperative and postoperative lower esophageal sphincter pressure were 34.6 mmHg (range, 15.3-59.4 mmHg) and 15.0 mmHg (range, 2.1-21.6 mmHg), respectively, indicating a statistically significant decrease after POEM. All of the 21 patients were treated successfully by POEM (postoperative Eckardt score ≤ 3) and still had the same Ling type during a mean follow-up period of 37.8 mo (range, 24-51 mo).

CONCLUSION

The Ling classification represents the endoscopic progressive process of achalasia and may be able to serve as an endoscopic assessment criterion for achalasia. Successful POEM (Eckardt score ≤ 3) seems to have the ability to prevent endoscopic evolvement of achalasia. However, studies with larger populations are warranted to confirm our findings.

摘要

目的

验证林氏分类描述贲门失弛缓症内镜下进展过程的假说,并确定经口内镜下肌切开术(POEM)成功预防贲门失弛缓症内镜进展的能力。

方法

我们回顾性分析了贲门失弛缓症患者的内镜检查结果、症状持续时间和测压数据。共评估了359例患者(197例女性,162例男性),平均年龄42.1岁(范围12 - 75岁)。症状持续时间为2至360个月,中位数为36个月。根据林氏分类,患者分为I型(n = 119)、IIa型(n = 106)、IIb型(n = 60)、IIc型(n = 60)或III型(n = 14)。359例患者中,349例接受了POEM,其中21例接受了超过2年的内镜随访。比较这21例患者治疗前后的林氏分类。

结果

症状持续时间随林氏分类(从I到III)增加而显著增加(P < 0.05),而食管下括约肌压力随林氏类型增加而降低(从I到III)(P < 0.05)。林氏各类型之间的性别比和发病年龄无差异,尽管IIc型和III型的诊断年龄高于I型、IIa型和IIb型。21例患者中,19例在治疗前后均进行了高分辨率测压。术前和术后食管下括约肌平均压力分别为34.6 mmHg(范围15.3 - 59.4 mmHg)和15.0 mmHg(范围2.1 - 21.6 mmHg),表明POEM术后有统计学显著下降。21例患者均通过POEM成功治疗(术后埃卡德评分≤3),在平均37.8个月(范围24 - 51个月)的随访期内林氏类型不变。

结论

林氏分类代表贲门失弛缓症的内镜进展过程,可能可作为贲门失弛缓症的内镜评估标准。成功的POEM(埃卡德评分≤3)似乎有能力预防贲门失弛缓症的内镜进展。然而,需要更大样本量的研究来证实我们的发现。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cd88/5434437/7a42ed19f566/WJG-23-3309-g001.jpg

相似文献

2
Two-year follow-up for 45 patients with achalasia who underwent peroral endoscopic myotomy.
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2015 May;47(5):890-6. doi: 10.1093/ejcts/ezu320. Epub 2014 Sep 4.
3
Efficacy of peroral endoscopic myotomy vs other achalasia treatments in improving esophageal function.
World J Gastroenterol. 2016 May 28;22(20):4918-25. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v22.i20.4918.
7
Is integrated relaxation pressure a promising predictor of effectiveness of peroral endoscopic myotomy for achalasia?
Z Gastroenterol. 2018 Feb;56(2):111-116. doi: 10.1055/s-0043-120348. Epub 2017 Nov 7.
9
New endoscopic classification of achalasia for selection of candidates for peroral endoscopic myotomy.
World J Gastroenterol. 2013 Jan 28;19(4):556-60. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v19.i4.556.
10
Peroral endoscopic myotomy for esophageal achalasia: outcomes of the first over 100 patients with short-term follow-up.
Surg Endosc. 2016 Nov;30(11):4817-4826. doi: 10.1007/s00464-016-4813-1. Epub 2016 Mar 1.

引用本文的文献

3
Consensus on the digestive endoscopic tunnel technique.
World J Gastroenterol. 2019 Feb 21;25(7):744-776. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v25.i7.744.

本文引用的文献

1
Peroral endoscopic myotomy for esophageal achalasia: outcomes of the first over 100 patients with short-term follow-up.
Surg Endosc. 2016 Nov;30(11):4817-4826. doi: 10.1007/s00464-016-4813-1. Epub 2016 Mar 1.
3
Achalasia.
Lancet. 2014 Jan 4;383(9911):83-93. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(13)60651-0. Epub 2013 Jul 17.
4
Peroral endoscopic myotomy for the treatment of achalasia: an international prospective multicenter study.
Gastroenterology. 2013 Aug;145(2):309-11.e1-3. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2013.04.057. Epub 2013 May 9.
5
New endoscopic classification of achalasia for selection of candidates for peroral endoscopic myotomy.
World J Gastroenterol. 2013 Jan 28;19(4):556-60. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v19.i4.556.
6
Peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) for esophageal achalasia.
Endoscopy. 2010 Apr;42(4):265-71. doi: 10.1055/s-0029-1244080. Epub 2010 Mar 30.
7
Oesophageal motility disorders.
Lancet. 2001 Sep 8;358(9284):823-8. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(01)05973-6.
8
Manometric and radiographic verification of esophageal body decompensation for patients with achalasia.
J Am Coll Surg. 1999 Aug;189(2):158-63. doi: 10.1016/s1072-7515(99)00091-5.
9
Esophageal motor disorders.
Surg Clin North Am. 1987 Jun;67(3):455-74. doi: 10.1016/s0039-6109(16)44226-x.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验