• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Safety and Efficacy of a Novel "Hybrid Closure" Technique in Large-Bore Arteriotomies.一种新型“混合闭合”技术在大口径动脉切开术中的安全性和有效性
Int J Angiol. 2017 Jun;26(2):116-120. doi: 10.1055/s-0037-1598252. Epub 2017 Feb 25.
2
Two-Device Closure Method for Large Diameter Arteriotomies in Percutaneous Endovascular Aortic Repair.经皮血管内主动脉修复术中大直径动脉切口的双器械闭合方法
Ann Vasc Surg. 2020 Jan;62:191-194. doi: 10.1016/j.avsg.2019.06.008. Epub 2019 Aug 23.
3
Feasibility and Safety of an 8 F Angioseal Vascular Closure Device for Closure of Large Bore Impella CP Access.8F Angioseal 血管闭合装置用于关闭大口径 Impella CP 入路的可行性和安全性。
J Endovasc Ther. 2022 Jun;29(3):336-342. doi: 10.1177/15266028211047965. Epub 2021 Sep 24.
4
Using Arterial Recoil for Large Bore Access Closure After Impella Assist Device Removal.使用动脉回弹技术实现 Impella 辅助设备移除后的大口径血管通路关闭。
Crit Pathw Cardiol. 2024 Mar 1;23(1):36-38. doi: 10.1097/HPC.0000000000000343. Epub 2023 Nov 9.
5
Suture-Based Vascular Closure Versus Surgical Closure of Large Bore Arteriotomies: A Real-World Experience.基于缝线的血管闭合术与大口径动脉切开术的手术闭合:真实世界经验
Cureus. 2024 Feb 25;16(2):e54856. doi: 10.7759/cureus.54856. eCollection 2024 Feb.
6
Pre-close technique of percutaneous closure for delayed hemostasis of large-bore femoral sheaths.经皮闭合大口径股动脉鞘延迟止血的预闭合技术
J Interv Cardiol. 2018 Aug;31(4):504-510. doi: 10.1111/joic.12490. Epub 2018 Feb 5.
7
A novel technique for postclosure of large-bore sheaths using two Perclose devices.使用两个 Perclose 装置对大口径鞘管进行闭合后的新型技术。
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2021 Apr 1;97(5):905-909. doi: 10.1002/ccd.29351. Epub 2020 Oct 24.
8
Use of vascular sealing devices (VasoSeal and Perclose) versus assisted manual compression (Femostop) in transcatheter coronary interventions requiring abciximab (ReoPro).在需要使用阿昔单抗(ReoPro)的经导管冠状动脉介入治疗中,血管封堵装置(VasoSeal和Perclose)与手动辅助压迫(Femostop)的应用比较
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 1999 Jun;47(2):143-7; discussion 148. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1522-726X(199906)47:2<143::AID-CCD1>3.0.CO;2-M.
9
Percutaneous Plug-Based Arteriotomy Closure Device for Large-Bore Access: A Multicenter Prospective Study.经皮塞栓式动脉切开术闭合装置用于大口径血管入路:一项多中心前瞻性研究。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2017 Mar 27;10(6):613-619. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2016.12.277.
10
Percutaneous femoral closure following stent-graft placement: use of the Perclose device.支架型人工血管置入术后经皮股动脉闭合:Perclose装置的应用
Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2004 May-Jun;27(3):231-6. doi: 10.1007/s00270-003-2713-y. Epub 2004 Mar 25.

引用本文的文献

1
Large-Bore Transfemoral Arterial Access: Techniques and Troubleshooting.大口径经股动脉入路:技术与故障排除
Semin Intervent Radiol. 2024 Dec 18;41(6):560-565. doi: 10.1055/s-0044-1800957. eCollection 2024 Dec.
2
Best practices for vascular arterial access and closure: a contemporary guide for the cardiac catheterization laboratory.血管动脉通路与闭合的最佳实践:心脏导管实验室当代指南
Front Cardiovasc Med. 2024 Mar 14;11:1349480. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2024.1349480. eCollection 2024.
3
Suture-Based Vascular Closure Versus Surgical Closure of Large Bore Arteriotomies: A Real-World Experience.基于缝线的血管闭合术与大口径动脉切开术的手术闭合:真实世界经验
Cureus. 2024 Feb 25;16(2):e54856. doi: 10.7759/cureus.54856. eCollection 2024 Feb.
4
A Review of Bleeding Risk with Impella-supported High-risk Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.Impella支持的高风险经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的出血风险综述
Heart Int. 2020 Dec 29;14(2):92-99. doi: 10.17925/HI.2020.14.2.92. eCollection 2020.

本文引用的文献

1
The double angio-seal technique for arterial closure following large-bore access.用于大口径血管穿刺后动脉闭合的双血管封堵技术。
J Invasive Cardiol. 2013 Aug;25(8):412-4.
2
The preclose technique in percutaneous endovascular aortic repair: a systematic literature review and meta-analysis.经皮血管内主动脉修复术的预闭技术:系统文献回顾和荟萃分析。
Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2013 Jun;36(3):567-77. doi: 10.1007/s00270-013-0593-3. Epub 2013 Mar 13.
3
[Effectiveness comparison between double Perclose ProGlide crossing suture and traditional suture for closure of puncture sites in endovascular aortic repair].[双Perclose ProGlide交叉缝合与传统缝合在血管腔内主动脉修复术中穿刺部位闭合的效果比较]
Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2012 Aug;26(8):968-71.
4
Clinical outcomes using a new crossover balloon occlusion technique for percutaneous closure after transfemoral aortic valve implantation.经股动脉主动脉瓣植入术后应用新型交叉球囊阻断技术行经皮封堵的临床转归。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2011 Aug;4(8):861-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2011.05.019.
5
Closure device or manual compression in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention: a randomized comparison.经皮冠状动脉介入治疗患者使用闭合装置或手动压迫的随机对照比较
J Invasive Cardiol. 2010 Dec;22(12):562-6.
6
A randomised controlled trial comparing StarClose and AngioSeal vascular closure devices in a district general hospital--the SCOAST study.一项在地区综合医院比较StarClose和AngioSeal血管闭合装置的随机对照试验——SCOAST研究。
Int J Clin Pract. 2008 Jun;62(6):912-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1742-1241.2008.01761.x.
7
A randomized trial comparing compression, Perclose Proglide and Angio-Seal VIP for arterial closure following percutaneous coronary intervention: the CAP trial.一项比较压迫止血、Perclose Proglide血管缝合器和Angio-Seal VIP血管闭合装置用于经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后动脉闭合的随机试验:CAP试验。
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2008 Jan 1;71(1):1-5. doi: 10.1002/ccd.21333.
8
The safety and efficacy of an extravascular, water-soluble sealant for vascular closure: initial clinical results for Mynx.一种用于血管闭合的血管外水溶性密封剂的安全性和有效性:Mynx的初步临床结果。
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2007 Nov 1;70(5):627-33. doi: 10.1002/ccd.21353.
9
Total percutaneous access for endovascular aortic aneurysm repair ("Preclose" technique).血管腔内主动脉瘤修复术的全经皮入路(“预闭合”技术)
J Vasc Surg. 2007 Jun;45(6):1095-101. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2007.01.050. Epub 2007 Mar 29.

一种新型“混合闭合”技术在大口径动脉切开术中的安全性和有效性

Safety and Efficacy of a Novel "Hybrid Closure" Technique in Large-Bore Arteriotomies.

作者信息

Amponsah Michael K, Tayal Rajiv, Khakwani Zain, Sinclair Michael, Wasty Najam

机构信息

Division of Cardiology, Newark Beth Israel Medical Center, Newark, New Jersey.

出版信息

Int J Angiol. 2017 Jun;26(2):116-120. doi: 10.1055/s-0037-1598252. Epub 2017 Feb 25.

DOI:10.1055/s-0037-1598252
PMID:28566938
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5446258/
Abstract

The "preclose" technique employing two Perclose (P) devices is well established for large-bore artery (LBA) hemostasis. Occasionally, only one Perclose deploys successfully during the initial preclose because of arterial calcification necessitating the use of the crossover balloon technique to achieve hemostasis at the LBA. We sought to determine if the combined use of one Perclose and either one Angioseal or one Mynx vascular closure device (VCD) is a safe alternative closure technique large-bore arteriotomy closure. In total, 40 patients underwent high-risk percutaneous coronary intervention (HRPCI) with Impella support, of whom 38 had common femoral artery (CFA) arteriotomies and 2 underwent percutaneous axillary arteriotomy (AA). Prior to Impella insertion, one Perclose device was predeployed. At the end of HRPCI, Impella was removed and a 0.035″ wire was inserted through the Impella sheath. This sheath was then withdrawn over the wire, and partially deployed Perclose was fully deployed. A 6-Fr sheath was advanced over a 0.035″ wire into the CFA or AA, achieving hemostasis and reducing the LBA to a 6-Fr size. The 6-Fr arteriotomy was closed with a 6-Fr Mynx or Angioseal VCD. Patients were followed at day 1 and day 30. Hybrid closure was successful in 38 of 40 cases. In one case of Mynx balloon rupture, hemostasis was achieved with heparin reversal and manual compression. In the case of Perclose failure, crossover balloon tamponade at arteriotomy site and external manual compression achieved hemostasis. Patients were free of complications at day 1 and day 30. Hybrid closure with one Perclose and either one Mynx or one Angioseal VCD is safe and effective for LBA closure.

摘要

采用两个Perclose(P)装置的“预闭合”技术在大口径动脉(LBA)止血方面已得到充分确立。偶尔,由于动脉钙化,在初始预闭合过程中只有一个Perclose能成功展开,这就需要使用交叉球囊技术来实现LBA的止血。我们试图确定将一个Perclose与一个Angioseal或一个Mynx血管闭合装置(VCD)联合使用是否是一种安全的替代闭合技术用于大口径动脉切开术闭合。总共40例患者在Impella支持下接受了高风险经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(HRPCI),其中38例进行了股总动脉(CFA)切开术,2例进行了经皮腋动脉切开术(AA)。在插入Impella之前,预先展开一个Perclose装置。在HRPCI结束时,移除Impella并通过Impella鞘管插入一根0.035英寸的导丝。然后将该鞘管沿导丝撤回,将部分展开的Perclose完全展开。将一个6F鞘管沿一根0.035英寸的导丝推进到CFA或AA中,实现止血并将LBA缩小到6F尺寸。用一个6F的Mynx或Angioseal VCD闭合6F动脉切开术。在第1天和第30天对患者进行随访。40例中有38例混合闭合成功。在1例Mynx球囊破裂的病例中,通过肝素逆转和手动压迫实现了止血。在Perclose失败的病例中,在动脉切开部位进行交叉球囊压迫和外部手动压迫实现了止血。患者在第1天和第30天没有并发症。用一个Perclose与一个Mynx或一个Angioseal VCD进行混合闭合对于LBA闭合是安全有效的。