Gellert George A, Catzoela Linda, Patel Lajja, Bruner Kylynn, Friedman Felix, Ramirez Ricardo, Saucedo Lilliana, Webster S Luke, Gillean John A
Department of Health Informatics at CHRISTUS Health in San Antonio, TX.
CHRISTUS Health in San Antonio, TX.
Perspect Health Inf Manag. 2017 Apr 1;14(Spring):1e. eCollection 2017 Spring.
One strategy to foster adoption of computerized provider order entry (CPOE) by physicians is the monthly distribution of a list identifying the number and use rate percentage of orders entered electronically versus on paper by each physician in the facility. Physicians care about CPOE use rate reports because they support the patient safety and quality improvement objectives of CPOE implementation. Certain physician groups are also motivated because they participate in contracted financial and performance arrangements that include incentive payments or financial penalties for meeting (or failing to meet) a specified CPOE use rate target. Misattribution of order sources can hinder accurate measurement of individual physician CPOE use and can thereby undermine providers' confidence in their reported performance, as well as their motivation to utilize CPOE. Misattribution of order sources also has significant patient safety, quality, and medicolegal implications.
This analysis sought to evaluate the magnitude and sources of misattribution among hospitalists with high CPOE use and, if misattribution was found, to formulate strategies to prevent and reduce its recurrence, thereby ensuring the integrity and credibility of individual and facility CPOE use rate reporting.
A detailed manual order source review and validation of all orders issued by one hospitalist group at a midsize community hospital was conducted for a one-month study period.
We found that a small but not dismissible percentage of orders issued by hospitalists-up to 4.18 percent (95 percent confidence interval, 3.84-4.56 percent) per month-were attributed inaccurately. Sources of misattribution by department or function were as follows: nursing, 42 percent; pharmacy, 38 percent; laboratory, 15 percent; unit clerk, 3 percent; and radiology, 2 percent. Order management and protocol were the most common correct order sources that were incorrectly attributed.
Order source misattribution can negatively affect reported provider CPOE use rates and should be investigated if providers perceive discrepancies between reported rates and their actual performance. Preventive education and communication efforts across departments can help prevent and reduce misattribution.
促进医生采用计算机化医嘱录入(CPOE)的一种策略是每月分发一份清单,该清单标明机构中每位医生以电子方式录入的医嘱数量及使用率百分比与纸质医嘱数量及使用率百分比。医生关注CPOE使用率报告,因为这些报告有助于实现CPOE实施的患者安全和质量改进目标。某些医生群体也受到激励,因为他们参与了合同规定的财务和绩效安排,其中包括针对达到(或未达到)特定CPOE使用率目标的激励支付或经济处罚。医嘱来源的错误归因可能会阻碍对个体医生CPOE使用情况的准确衡量,从而破坏医生对其报告绩效的信心,以及他们使用CPOE的积极性。医嘱来源的错误归因还具有重大的患者安全、质量和法医学意义。
本分析旨在评估高CPOE使用率的住院医生中错误归因的程度和来源,如果发现错误归因,制定预防和减少其再次发生的策略,从而确保个体和机构CPOE使用率报告的完整性和可信度。
在一个月的研究期内,对一家中型社区医院的一个住院医生团队开具的所有医嘱进行了详细的手工医嘱来源审查和验证。
我们发现,住院医生开具的医嘱中有一小部分(每月高达4.18%,95%置信区间为3.84 - 4.56%)被错误归因,这一比例虽小但不容忽视。按科室或职能划分的错误归因来源如下:护理,42%;药房,38%;实验室,15%;病房文员,3%;放射科,2%。医嘱管理和协议是最常被错误归因的正确医嘱来源。
医嘱来源错误归因可能会对报告的医生CPOE使用率产生负面影响,如果医生察觉到报告的使用率与他们的实际表现存在差异,就应该进行调查。跨部门的预防教育和沟通工作有助于预防和减少错误归因。