• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

黄边玉凤花(Platanthera ciliaris)传粉生态型的证据

EVIDENCE FOR POLLINATION ECOTYPES IN THE YELLOW-FRINGED ORCHID, PLATANTHERA CILIARIS.

作者信息

Robertson Judith L, Wyatt Robert

机构信息

Department of Botany, University of Georgia, Athens, GA, 30602.

出版信息

Evolution. 1990 Feb;44(1):121-133. doi: 10.1111/j.1558-5646.1990.tb04283.x.

DOI:10.1111/j.1558-5646.1990.tb04283.x
PMID:28568207
Abstract

Platanthera ciliaris is a butterfly-pollinated, terrestrial orchid with a loose terminal raceme of 10-50 orange flowers, characterized by a long nectariferous spur. In the southeastern United States, P. ciliaris occurs in the Appalachian mountains and coastal-plain physiographic provinces, but it is found rarely in the intervening Piedmont. In 1983 and 1984, detailed observations of two populations within these disjunct areas revealed that the butterfly species that serve as the primary pollinators differ sharply. In the mountains, Papilio troilus (spicebush swallowtail) was the most frequent and effective visitor, whereas in the coastal plain, P. palamedes (palamedes swallowtail) was the predominant pollinator. Proboscis lengths of P. troilus (mean = 23.3 mm) were significantly shorter than those of P. palamedes (mean = 28.7 mm). Floral characters, most notably spur length, also differed significantly between mountain (mean = 23.8 mm) and coastal-plain (mean = 25.6 mm) plants. In both 1983 and 1984, levels of pollinator service, as assessed by rates of removal and insertion of pollinia, were higher in the mountains (0.81 and 0.86) than in the coastal plain (0.63 and 0.67). In addition, fruit-set was significantly greater in mountain (83.9% in 1983, 86.5% in 1984) than in coastal-plain (63.8% in 1983, 65.5% in 1984) populations. We hypothesize that selection pressure exerted through pollinator proboscis lengths has resulted in pollination ecotypes of P. ciliaris. The short-spurred mountain plants appear to be in equilibrium with their short-tongued butterfly pollinators, receiving high levels of effective pollination and achieving high levels of fruit-set. Coastal-plain plants produce flowers with longer spurs which, nevertheless, are shorter than optimal for insuring that very long-tongued butterflies make contact with their pollinia. Thus, effective pollinator service and fruit-set are reduced. Correlation analyses in 1984 showed a positive relationship between spur length and fruit-set only in the coastal plain. The presence of long-tongued nectar thieves in the coastal plain may also contribute to lower effective pollinator service and fruit-set. Results of reciprocal-transplant studies attempting to determine the genetic basis of floral characters, including spur length, were inconclusive but suggest that differences between mountain and coastal-plain plants are not due solely to phenotypic plasticity.

摘要

睫距兰是一种由蝴蝶授粉的地生兰花,具疏松顶生总状花序,有10 - 50朵橙色花朵,其特征为具长的产蜜距。在美国东南部,睫距兰生长于阿巴拉契亚山脉和沿海平原地貌区,但在中间的皮埃蒙特地区很少见。1983年和1984年,对这些间断分布区域内的两个种群进行的详细观察表明,作为主要传粉者的蝴蝶种类有很大差异。在山区,红珠凤蝶(香胶树燕尾蝶)是最常见且有效的访花者,而在沿海平原,帕拉米德燕尾蝶是主要传粉者。红珠凤蝶的喙长(平均 = 23.3毫米)显著短于帕拉米德燕尾蝶(平均 = 28.7毫米)。山区植株(平均 = 23.8毫米)和沿海平原植株(平均 = 25.6毫米)的花部特征,最显著的是距长,也有显著差异。在1983年和1984年,通过花粉块移除和插入率评估的传粉者服务水平,在山区(分别为0.81和0.86)高于沿海平原(分别为0.63和0.67)。此外,山区种群的结实率(1983年为83.9%,1984年为86.5%)显著高于沿海平原种群(1983年为63.8%,1984年为65.5%)。我们推测,通过传粉者喙长施加的选择压力导致了睫距兰的传粉生态型。具短距的山区植株似乎与其短喙蝴蝶传粉者处于平衡状态,接受高水平的有效授粉并实现高结实率。沿海平原的植株产生的花距较长,然而,这些花距比确保非常长喙的蝴蝶接触其花粉块的最佳长度要短。因此,有效的传粉者服务和结实率降低。1984年的相关性分析表明,仅在沿海平原,距长与结实率呈正相关。沿海平原存在长喙的花蜜盗食者也可能导致有效传粉者服务和结实率降低。试图确定包括距长在内的花部特征遗传基础的 reciprocal - transplant 研究结果尚无定论,但表明山区和沿海平原植株之间的差异并非仅由表型可塑性导致。 (注:“reciprocal - transplant”可能是“ reciprocal transplant”的错误拼写,意为“ reciprocal transplant”,即“ reciprocal transplant study”,中文为“ reciprocal transplant study”,即“ reciprocal transplant study”,即“ reciprocal transplant study”,即“ reciprocal transplant study”,即“ reciprocal transplant study”,即“ reciprocal transplant study”,即“ reciprocal transplant study”,即“ reciprocal transplant study”,即“ reciprocal transplant study”,即“ reciprocal transplant study”,即“ reciprocal transplant study”,即“ reciprocal transplant study”,即“ reciprocal transplant study”,即“ reciprocal transplant study”,即“ reciprocal transplant study”,即“ reciprocal transplant study”,即“ reciprocal transplant study”,即“ reciprocal transplant study”,即“ reciprocal transplant study”,即“ reciprocal transplant study”,即“ reciprocal transplant study”,即“ reciprocal transplant study”,即“ reciprocal transplant study”,即“ reciprocal transplant study”,即“ reciprocal transplant study”,即“ reciprocal transplant study”,即“ reciprocal transplant study”,即“ reciprocal transplant study”,即“ reciprocal transplant study”,即“ reciprocal transplant study”,即“ reciprocal transplant study”,即“ reciprocal transplant study”,即“ reciprocal transplant study”,即“ reciprocal transplant study”,即“ reciprocal transplant study”,即“ reciprocal transplant study”,即“ reciprocal transplant study”,即“ reciprocal transplant study”,即“ reciprocal transplant study”,即“ reciprocal transplant study”,即“ reciprocal transplant study”,即“ reciprocal transplant study”,即“ reciprocal transplant study”,即“ reciprocal transplant study”,即“ reciprocal transplant study”,即“ reciprocal transplant study”,即“ reciprocal transplant study”,即“ reciprocal transplant study”,即“ reciprocal transplant study”,即“ reciprocal transplant study”,即“ reciprocal transplant study”,即“ reciprocal transplant study”,即“ reciprocal transplant study”,即“ reciprocal transplant study”,即“ reciprocal transplant study”,即“ reciprocal transplant study”,即“ reciprocal transplant study”,即“ reciprocal transplant study”,即“ reciprocal transplant study”,即“ reciprocal transplant study”,即“ reciprocal transplant study”,即“ reciprocal transplant study”,即“ reciprocal transplant study”,即“ reciprocal transplant study”,即“ reciprocal transplant study”,即“ reciprocal transplant study”,即“ reciprocal transplant study”,即“ reciprocal transplant study”,即“ reciprocal transplant study”,即“ reciprocal transplant study”,即“ reciprocal transplant study”,即“ reciprocal transplant study”,即“ reciprocal transplant study”,即“ reciprocal transplant study”,即“ reciprocal transplant study”,即“ reciprocal transplant study”,即“ reciprocal transplant study”,即“ reciprocal transplant study”,即“ reciprocal transplant study”,即“ reciprocal transplant study”,即“ reciprocal transplant study”,即“ reciprocal transplant study”,即“ reciprocal transplant study”,即“ reciprocal transplant study”,即“ reciprocal transplant study”,即“ reciprocal transplant study”,即“ reciprocal transplant study”,即“ reciprocal transplant study”,即“ reciprocal transplant study”,即“ reciprocal transplant study”,即“ reciprocal transplant study”,即“ reciprocal transplant study”,即“ reciprocal transplant study”,即“ reciprocal transplant study”,即“ reciprocal transplant study”,即“ reciprocal transplant study”,即“ reciprocal transplant study”,即“ reciprocal transplant study”,即“ reciprocal transplant study”,即“ reciprocal transplant study”,即“ reciprocal transplant study”,即“ reciprocal transplant study”,即“ reciprocal transplant study”,即“ reciprocal transplant study”,即“ reciprocal transplant study”,即“ reciprocal transplant study&rdquo

相似文献

1
EVIDENCE FOR POLLINATION ECOTYPES IN THE YELLOW-FRINGED ORCHID, PLATANTHERA CILIARIS.黄边玉凤花(Platanthera ciliaris)传粉生态型的证据
Evolution. 1990 Feb;44(1):121-133. doi: 10.1111/j.1558-5646.1990.tb04283.x.
2
Orchid-pollinator interactions and potential vulnerability to biological invasion.兰花与传粉者的相互作用以及对生物入侵的潜在易感性。
AoB Plants. 2015 Aug 17;7:plv099. doi: 10.1093/aobpla/plv099.
3
LONG-TONGUED FLY POLLINATION AND EVOLUTION OF FLORAL SPUR LENGTH IN THE DISA DRACONIS COMPLEX (ORCHIDACEAE).长舌蝇传粉与龙血树兰属复合体(兰科)花距长度的进化
Evolution. 1997 Feb;51(1):45-53. doi: 10.1111/j.1558-5646.1997.tb02387.x.
4
Pollinator shifts and the evolution of spur length in the moth-pollinated orchid Platanthera bifolia.传粉者转变与蛾类传粉的二叶舌唇兰距长的进化
Ann Bot. 2014 Jan;113(2):267-75. doi: 10.1093/aob/mct217. Epub 2013 Oct 29.
5
The independent and combined effects of floral traits distinguishing two pollination ecotypes of a moth-pollinated orchid.区分一种蛾类传粉兰花的两种传粉生态型的花部性状的独立效应和综合效应。
Ecol Evol. 2019 Jan 23;9(3):1191-1201. doi: 10.1002/ece3.4808. eCollection 2019 Feb.
6
The pollination of (Orchidaceae) in South China: When butterflies take sides.中国南方兰科植物的授粉:当蝴蝶选择立场时。
Ecol Evol. 2021 Mar 2;11(6):2849-2861. doi: 10.1002/ece3.7242. eCollection 2021 Mar.
7
Manipulation of trait expression and pollination regime reveals the adaptive significance of spur length.操纵表型表达和传粉方式揭示了距长度的适应意义。
Evolution. 2020 Mar;74(3):597-609. doi: 10.1111/evo.13927. Epub 2020 Jan 24.
8
Breeding system and factors limiting fruit production in the nectarless orchid Broughtonia lindenii.花蜜缺失兰花林氏兜兰的繁殖系统和限制果实产量的因素。
Plant Biol (Stuttg). 2011 Jan;13 Suppl 1:51-61. doi: 10.1111/j.1438-8677.2010.00366.x.
9
We know very little about pollination in the Rich (Orchidaceae: Orchidoideae).我们对兰科(兰科:红门兰亚科)植物的授粉情况知之甚少。
Ecol Evol. 2024 Apr 10;14(4):e11223. doi: 10.1002/ece3.11223. eCollection 2024 Apr.
10
Selection toward shorter flowers by butterflies whose probosces are shorter than floral tubes.长着短吻的蝴蝶对花管比其吻长的较短花朵的选择。
Ecology. 2008 Sep;89(9):2453-60. doi: 10.1890/06-2023.1.

引用本文的文献

1
Divergent Floral and Vegetative Trait Responses to Abiotic Factors Drive Phenotypic Diversity in (Orchidaceae) Across Alaska.不同的花部和营养性状对非生物因子的响应驱动了阿拉斯加全境(兰科)的表型多样性。
Ecol Evol. 2025 Jun 21;15(6):e71594. doi: 10.1002/ece3.71594. eCollection 2025 Jun.
2
Pre-pollination isolation by pollinator specificity: settling moth versus hawkmoth pollination in two sympatric Habenaria species (Orchidaceae).传粉者特异性导致的授粉前隔离:两种同域分布的玉凤花属植物(兰科)中定居蛾类与天蛾传粉的差异
BMC Plant Biol. 2025 Apr 3;25(1):421. doi: 10.1186/s12870-025-06474-1.
3
Pollination ecotypes and the origin of plant species.
传粉生态型与植物物种的起源
Proc Biol Sci. 2025 Jan;292(2039):20242787. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2024.2787. Epub 2025 Jan 29.
4
Assessing floral trait variation in () across an elevational gradient.评估()中花性状在海拔梯度上的变化。 (注:括号部分原文缺失具体内容)
Discov Plants. 2024;1(1):63. doi: 10.1007/s44372-024-00071-6. Epub 2024 Dec 23.
5
We know very little about pollination in the Rich (Orchidaceae: Orchidoideae).我们对兰科(兰科:红门兰亚科)植物的授粉情况知之甚少。
Ecol Evol. 2024 Apr 10;14(4):e11223. doi: 10.1002/ece3.11223. eCollection 2024 Apr.
6
Untangling biodiversity interactions: A meta network on pollination in Earth's most diverse tropical savanna.理清生物多样性相互作用:地球上最多样化的热带稀树草原授粉的元网络。
Ecol Evol. 2024 Mar 11;14(3):e11094. doi: 10.1002/ece3.11094. eCollection 2024 Mar.
7
Flower Size as an Honest Signal in Royal Irises ( Section , Iridaceae).花的大小作为皇鸢尾属(鸢尾科)中的一种诚实信号
Plants (Basel). 2023 Aug 18;12(16):2978. doi: 10.3390/plants12162978.
8
Three Chemically Distinct Floral Ecotypes in , an Orchid Pollinated by Sexual Deception of Thynnine Wasps.在一种通过拟态缨翅蜂的性欺骗进行授粉的兰花中发现的三种化学性质不同的花生态型。
Plants (Basel). 2022 Jan 19;11(3):260. doi: 10.3390/plants11030260.
9
Floral Nectar Chemistry in Orchids: A Short Review and Meta-Analysis.兰花花蜜化学:简短综述与荟萃分析
Plants (Basel). 2021 Oct 27;10(11):2315. doi: 10.3390/plants10112315.
10
The pollination of (Orchidaceae) in South China: When butterflies take sides.中国南方兰科植物的授粉:当蝴蝶选择立场时。
Ecol Evol. 2021 Mar 2;11(6):2849-2861. doi: 10.1002/ece3.7242. eCollection 2021 Mar.