Welbergen Philip, van Dijken Folchert R, Scharloo Wim, Köhler Wolfgang
Biometrics and Population Genetics, University of Giessen, Giessen, Federal Republic of Germany.
Department of Population and Evolutionary Biology, University of Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Evolution. 1992 Oct;46(5):1385-1398. doi: 10.1111/j.1558-5646.1992.tb01131.x.
The genetic analysis of sexual isolation between the closely-related species Drosophila melanogaster and Drosophila simulans involved two experiments with no-choice tests. The efficiency of sexual isolation was measured by the frequency of courtship initiation and interspecific mating. We first surveyed the variation in sexual isolation between D. melanogaster strains and D. simulans strains of different geographic origin. Then, to investigate variation in sexual isolation within strains, we made F diallel sets of reciprocal crosses within strains of D. melanogaster and D. simulans. The F diallel progeny of one sex were paired with the opposite sex of the other species. The first experiment showed significant differences in the frequency of interspecific mating between geographic strains. There were more matings between D. simulans females and D. melanogaster males than between D. melanogaster females and D. simulans males. The second experiment uncovered that the male genotypes in the D. melanogaster diallel significantly differed in interspecific mating frequency, but not in courtship initiation frequency. The female genotypes in the D. simulans diallel were not significantly different in courtship initiation and interspecific mating frequency. Genetic analysis reveals that in D. melanogaster males sexual isolation was not affected by either maternal cytoplasmic effects, sex-linked effects, or epistatic interaction. The main genetic components were directional dominance and overdominance. The F males achieved more matings with D. simulans females than the inbred males. The genetic architecture of sexual isolation in D. melanogaster males argues for a history of weak or no selection for lower interspecific mating propensity. The behavioral causes of variation in sexual isolation between the two species are discussed.
对亲缘关系密切的物种黑腹果蝇和拟果蝇之间的性隔离进行遗传分析涉及两项无选择测试实验。通过求偶启动频率和种间交配频率来衡量性隔离的效率。我们首先调查了不同地理来源的黑腹果蝇品系和拟果蝇品系之间性隔离的差异。然后,为了研究品系内性隔离的差异,我们在黑腹果蝇和拟果蝇的品系内进行了正反交的F双列杂交组合。一个性别的F双列杂交后代与另一个物种的异性进行配对。第一个实验表明地理品系之间种间交配频率存在显著差异。拟果蝇雌性与黑腹果蝇雄性之间的交配比黑腹果蝇雌性与拟果蝇雄性之间的交配更多。第二个实验发现,黑腹果蝇双列杂交中的雄性基因型在种间交配频率上有显著差异,但在求偶启动频率上没有差异。拟果蝇双列杂交中的雌性基因型在求偶启动和种间交配频率上没有显著差异。遗传分析表明,在黑腹果蝇雄性中,性隔离不受母本细胞质效应、性连锁效应或上位性相互作用的影响。主要的遗传成分是定向显性和超显性。F雄性与拟果蝇雌性的交配比近交雄性更多。黑腹果蝇雄性中性隔离的遗传结构表明其在降低种间交配倾向方面存在弱选择或无选择的历史。文中讨论了这两个物种之间性隔离差异的行为原因。