Barone Antonio, Marchionni Francesco S, Cinquini Chiara, Cipolli Panattoni Andrea, Toti Paolo, Marconcini Simone, Covani Ugo, Gabriele Mario
Unit of Oral Surgery and Implantology, Department of Surgery, University-Hospitals of Geneva, University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland.
Unit of Odontostomatology and Oral Surgery, University-Hospital of Pisa, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy.
Minerva Stomatol. 2017 Aug;66(4):148-156. doi: 10.23736/S0026-4970.17.04047-X. Epub 2017 May 31.
Tooth extraction is a very common procedure in oral surgery. Despite this, very little information is available in the literature as to the antibiotic management of the patient. The aim of this study is to evaluate whether the antibiotic prophylaxis could be beneficial in preventing postextraction local complications and whether the use of a probiotic could help reduce the antibiotic gastro-intestinal side effects.
One hundred eleven patients meeting the inclusion criteria were initially included in this randomized clinical trial and randomly allocated to one of the three experimental groups according to a computer-generated randomization list. Patients allocated to the group 1 were given amoxicillin+clavulanic acid (2 g/day for 6 days), patients allocated to the group 2 received antibiotic + probiotic (Bifidobacterium longum+lactoferrin) and patients allocated to the group 3 received no antibiotic therapy after the extraction. To evaluate post-extractive complications, controls were performed at days 7, 14 and 21 after the extraction.
At T1 pain at the surgical site was present in the 48%, 30% and 71.4% of the patients belonging respectively to the antibiotic alone group, to the antibiotic+probiotic group and to the control group. The mean Numeric Rating Score (NRS) score was 1.56±1.91, 1.08±1.93, 2.02±2.27 respectively (P=0.0498). Two patients belonging to the control group experienced dry socket. In addition, 9 patients (33.3%) in the antibiotic-alone group and 1 patient (2.7%) in the antibiotic+probiotic group reported intestinal distension (P=0.0012), 7 days after surgery. Finally, diarrhea was recorded in 5 patients of the antibiotic alone group (18.5%), on the other hand, no patients of the antibiotic+probiotic group and the control group reported diarrhea.
Postextractive complications observed in each group have been mild and fast to resolve. The antibiotic administration showed a decrease in pain suffered by patients but a higher incidence of gastrointestinal side effects, such as abdominal distension and diarrhea, which seemed to be relieved by the concomitant use of the probiotic.
拔牙是口腔外科中非常常见的手术。尽管如此,文献中关于患者抗生素管理的信息却非常少。本研究的目的是评估抗生素预防是否有助于预防拔牙后局部并发症,以及使用益生菌是否有助于减少抗生素的胃肠道副作用。
111名符合纳入标准的患者最初被纳入这项随机临床试验,并根据计算机生成的随机列表随机分配到三个实验组之一。分配到第1组的患者给予阿莫西林+克拉维酸(2克/天,共6天),分配到第2组的患者接受抗生素+益生菌(长双歧杆菌+乳铁蛋白),分配到第3组的患者拔牙后不接受抗生素治疗。为了评估拔牙后并发症,在拔牙后第7天、第14天和第21天进行检查。
在T1时,分别属于单纯抗生素组、抗生素+益生菌组和对照组的患者中,手术部位疼痛的发生率分别为48%、30%和71.4%。平均数字评分量表(NRS)得分分别为1.56±1.91、1.08±1.93、2.02±2.27(P=0.0498)。对照组有两名患者发生干槽症。此外,术后7天,单纯抗生素组有9名患者(33.3%)报告腹胀,抗生素+益生菌组有1名患者(2.7%)报告腹胀(P=0.0012)。最后,单纯抗生素组有5名患者(18.5%)出现腹泻,而抗生素+益生菌组和对照组均无患者报告腹泻。
每组观察到的拔牙后并发症都很轻微,且很快得到缓解。抗生素治疗显示患者疼痛减轻,但胃肠道副作用(如腹胀和腹泻)的发生率较高,而同时使用益生菌似乎可以缓解这些副作用。