Court of Appeals rules DHSS notice on family planning contrary to law.
作者信息
Brahams D
出版信息
Lancet. 1985 Jan 5;1(8419):59-61. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(85)91020-7.
PMID:2856993
Abstract
摘要
相似文献
1
Court of Appeals rules DHSS notice on family planning contrary to law.上诉法院裁定，卫生和社会服务部关于计划生育的通知违法。
Lancet. 1985 Jan 5;1(8419):59-61. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(85)91020-7.
2
House of Lords rules DHSS guidance on contraception lawful.上议院裁定卫生和社会保障部关于避孕的指导方针合法。
Lancet. 1985 Oct 26;2(8461):959-60. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(85)90898-0.
3
Who has the right to advise children on birth control?谁有权就节育问题向儿童提供建议？
Med J Aust. 1986 Apr 14;144(8):419-23. doi: 10.5694/j.1326-5377.1986.tb128416.x.
4
Teenage confidence and consent.青少年的自信与同意。
Br Med J (Clin Res Ed). 1985 Jan 12;290(6462):144-5.
5
Contraception and the under-16s.避孕与16岁以下青少年
Lancet. 1985 Apr 6;1(8432):827.
6
A disturbing judgment by the Court of Appeal.上诉法院做出的一项令人不安的判决。
Lancet. 1985 Jan 5;1(8419):24-5.
7
Gillick v West Norfolk and Wisbech Area Health Authority.吉利克诉西诺福克和威斯贝奇地区健康管理局案
All Engl Law Rep. 1984;1985(1):533-59.
8
Further thoughts on Mrs. Gillick's case.关于吉利克夫人案件的进一步思考。
Lancet. 1985 Nov 16;2(8464):1138-9. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(85)90735-4.
9
The Gillick saga The Gillick saga -- II.
New Law J. 1985;135(6230 and 6231):1156-1158, 1179-1182.
Zotero 插件