Suppr超能文献

高通量透析:与低通量透析和在线血液透析滤过的临床、生化和蛋白质组学比较。

High-Flux Dialysis: Clinical, Biochemical, and Proteomic Comparison with Low-Flux Dialysis and On-Line Hemodiafiltration.

机构信息

Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Division of Nephrology, University of Pisa, Istituto di Biofisica, CNR, Pisa, Italy.

出版信息

Blood Purif. 2017;44(2):129-139. doi: 10.1159/000476053. Epub 2017 Jun 2.

Abstract

Hemodiafiltration on-line (on-line HDF) is a more efficient treatment than low-flux hemodialysis (HD). Unfortunately, it cannot be proposed to all patients. The aim of this study was to evaluate the safety, efficiency, and mechanisms of removal of toxins with high-flux HD vs. low-flux HD and on-line HDF. Randomized cross-over study designed to evaluate efficiency and tolerability of high-flux HD vs. low-flux HD in aged patients; to compare by means of biochemical and proteomic analyses the efficiency and mechanisms of removal of toxins with high-flux HD vs. on-line HDF. The removal of small toxins was similar with high-flux and low-flux HD. β2-microglobulin was removed only with high-flux HD, which had an excellent tolerability. The efficiency of high-flux HD was similar to on-line HDF. Proteomic analysis demonstrated that only high-flux membranes remove and adsorb small proteins. High-flux HD may be an efficient alternative to on-line HDF.

摘要

在线血液透析滤过(联机 HDF)比低通量血液透析(HD)更有效。但遗憾的是,并非所有患者都适用。本研究旨在评估高通量 HD 与低通量 HD 和联机 HDF 在清除毒素方面的安全性、效率和机制。这是一项随机交叉研究,旨在评估高龄患者中高通量 HD 与低通量 HD 的效率和耐受性;通过生化和蛋白质组学分析比较高通量 HD 与联机 HDF 清除毒素的效率和机制。小分子毒素的清除在高通量和低通量 HD 中相似。β2-微球蛋白仅被高通量 HD 清除,且具有极好的耐受性。高通量 HD 的效率与联机 HDF 相似。蛋白质组学分析表明,只有高通量膜才能清除和吸附小蛋白。高通量 HD 可能是联机 HDF 的有效替代方法。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验