Suppr超能文献

中分子 cutoff 透析器与 8 种血液透析滤过透析器:使用全球清除评分的比较。

Medium Cut-Off Dialyzer versus Eight Hemodiafiltration Dialyzers: Comparison Using a Global Removal Score.

机构信息

Department of Nephrology, Hospital Clínic Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain,

Department of Nephrology, Hospital Clínic Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.

出版信息

Blood Purif. 2019;48(2):167-174. doi: 10.1159/000499759. Epub 2019 Apr 3.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

A novel class of membranes, medium cut-off (MCO) membranes, has recently been designed to achieve interesting removal capacities for middle and large middle molecules in hemodialysis (HD) treatments. The few studies published to date have reported contradictory results regarding middle-sized molecules when comparing MCO dialyzers versus dialyzers used in online hemodiafiltration (OL-HDF).

METHODS

A prospective, single-center study was carried out in 22 patients. Each patient underwent 9 dialysis sessions with routine dialysis parameters, one with an MCO dialyzer in HD and the other 8 with different dialyzers in OL-HDF. The removal ratio (RR) of urea, creatinine, β2-microglobulin, myoglobin, prolactin, α1-microglobulin, α1-acid glycoprotein, and albumin was intraindividually compared. Albumin loss in dialysate was measured. We propose a global removal score ([ureaRR + β2-microglobulinRR + myoglobinRR + prolactinRR + α1-microglobulinRR + α1-acid glycoproteinRR]/6 - albuminRR) as a new tool for measuring dialyzer effectiveness.

RESULTS

No significant differences in the RRs of small and middle molecular range molecules were observed between the MCO vs. OL-HDF dialyzers (range 60-80%). Lower RRs were found for α1-microglobulin and α1-acid glycoprotein without significant differences. The albumin RR was < 11% and dialysate albumin loss was < 3.5 g in all situations without significant differences. The global removal score was 54.9 ± 4.8% with the MCO dialyzer without significant differences.

CONCLUSIONS

Removal of a wide range of molecular weights, calculated with the proposed global removal score, was almost equal with the MCO dialyzer in HD treatment compared with 8 high-flux dialyzers in high-volume OL-HDF without relevant changes in albumin loss. The global removal score could be a new tool to evaluate the effectiveness of dialyzers and/or different treatment modalities.

摘要

背景

最近设计了一类新型的膜,即中截留(MCO)膜,以实现血液透析(HD)治疗中对中大分子和大中小分子的有趣去除能力。迄今为止,为数不多的已发表研究报告在比较 MCO 透析器与在线血液透析滤过(OL-HDF)中使用的透析器时,对中分子量报告了相互矛盾的结果。

方法

一项前瞻性、单中心研究在 22 例患者中进行。每位患者接受 9 次常规透析参数的透析,1 次为 HD 中使用 MCO 透析器,8 次为 OL-HDF 中使用不同的透析器。个体内比较了尿素、肌酐、β2-微球蛋白、肌红蛋白、催乳素、α1-微球蛋白、α1-酸性糖蛋白和白蛋白的去除率(RR)。测量了透析液中的白蛋白丢失。我们提出了一个新的透析器效能测量工具,即全局去除评分[(尿素 RR + β2-微球蛋白 RR + 肌红蛋白 RR + 催乳素 RR + α1-微球蛋白 RR + α1-酸性糖蛋白 RR)/6-白蛋白 RR]。

结果

在 MCO 与 OL-HDF 透析器之间,小分子和中分子范围分子的 RR 没有显著差异(范围 60-80%)。α1-微球蛋白和 α1-酸性糖蛋白的 RR 较低,但无统计学差异。在所有情况下,白蛋白 RR 均<11%,透析液中白蛋白丢失均<3.5 g,无统计学差异。使用 MCO 透析器时,全局去除评分(global removal score)为 54.9±4.8%,无统计学差异。

结论

与 8 种高通量透析器在高容量 OL-HDF 中进行的高流量 OL-HDF 治疗相比,使用 MCO 透析器进行 HD 治疗时,计算得出的广泛分子量的去除率几乎相等,且白蛋白丢失无明显变化。全局去除评分可能是评估透析器和/或不同治疗方式效能的新工具。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验